Hi,
Can anyone tell me if generic 30pin simms are compatible with the above or
do I need genuine Sun branded.
Cheers,
Chris
On Thursday 09 October 2003 21:47, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone tell me if generic 30pin simms are compatible with the above or
> do I need genuine Sun branded.
I suspect you do, the maths dept at Canterbury may have some in their
basement store room, have a chat to one of their technicians or
Rather than dpkg -l, try dpkg --get-selections > file
If you save that to a file, a dpkg --set-selections < file is good to
setup a system with the same packages.
Easy to read and edit... and doesnt have the dpkg -l problem of
truncating a package name.
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 03:02, Rex wrote:
>
I've made a few posts in the past about these neat little machines and
thought I'd let you all know of a new development I discovered when
installing a few more this afternoon...
It seems that the most recent versions of the Falcon CR51 are shipping
with the Nehemiah core (model 9) in them. This i
Oh I forgot the part about backing up /etc and /home and the output of
dpkg --get-selections, then just wiping the hard drive and reinstalling
from scratch.
And for problems with /dev try using devfs, everything is recreated
automatically/dynamically. So you dont have non-existent devices lurking
We certainly put standard 30pin simms in our Sun Sparc 1. That was some
years back now.
- Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Downie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CLUG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 9:47 PM
Subject: OT: SPARCstation 1 Memory
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone t
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:51:04AM +1300, Sascha Beaumont wrote:
> Easy to read and edit... and doesnt have the dpkg -l problem of
> truncating a package name.
try: COLUMNS=150 dpkg -l
It's not a solution, --get-selections is much more elegant, but that dpkg -l
problem has a workaround.
Mike.
--
I use getmail. I use it to copy my pop mail from paradise and clear to
my own server. Plays nicely with qmail maildirs
Martin
Nick Rout wrote:
I have heard people rave about getmail, but have no experience of y own
with it.
http://www.qcc.ca/~charlesc/software/getmail-3.0/
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 1
This woman is fed-up:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/techinvestor/2003-10-07-msftsuit_x.htm
and I wish her well!
rgds
Jaco
On Friday 10 October 2003 13:52, Jaco Swart wrote:
> This woman is fed-up:
>
> http://www.usatoday.com/tech/techinvestor/2003-10-07-msftsuit_x.htm
>
> and I wish her well!
>
> rgds
> Jaco
I'm sorry, but I don't agree. So microsoft make lousy software; it's her
choice to use it. I think saying sh
I agree 100% and to take it one step further, what if the same standard
applied to OSS? Then who'd get sued, the poor college hacker who wrote
the program? What is there is no 'company' behind the software.
Ridiculous. Vote with your feet and wallet people, period. Litigious
americans annoy me.
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:35:42 +
Jason Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree 100% and to take it one step further, what if the same standard
> applied to OSS? Then who'd get sued, the poor college hacker who wrote
> the program? What is there is no 'company' behind the software.
> R
> I don't mean to rant, but this seems akin to blaming the builder of your house
> when you get burgled, instead of the burglar. What makes it worse is that 90%
> of people leave their front door wide open, and I suspect will still be
> inclined to blame the builder if they see others doing it :
On Friday 10 October 2003 15:48, Jaco Swart wrote:
> The problem is not the lack of security in software, but companies that
> create the impression that their software is perfectly secure. If I sell
> you a house, and tell you that it has first class locks, but in truth they
> are pretty lousy, -
There is an different view on this in that some countries make it harder
to "steal" someones "identity" than others.
Here in NZ a database writer is not allowed by law to use their
customers IRD number as a key into their database.
Even if they have a legitimate use for that I.R.D. number they
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:14:22 +1300
Zane Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is an different view on this in that some countries make it harder
> to "steal" someones "identity" than others.
>
> Here in NZ a database writer is not allowed by law to use their
> customers IRD number as a k
On 10 Oct 2003 at 16:09, Gareth Williams wrote:
> Surely a person has the right to say "I'm giving you this for free, use it at
> your own risk if you like, but I don't take any responsibility for it. I'm
> offering you this, it's up to you if you take it". Right? When you log into a
> Debian G
The point I was making was that an organisation is not allowed to use
somebodies IRD number to uniquely identify them unless they are the IRD
Here at the university we are not allowed to ask people for their IRD
number to get access to their record.
The power company would not be allowed to use
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:32, you wrote:
> On Friday 10 October 2003 13:52, Jaco Swart wrote:
> > This woman is fed-up:
> >
> > http://www.usatoday.com/tech/techinvestor/2003-10-07-msftsuit_x.htm
> >
> > and I wish her well!
> >
> > rgds
> > Jaco
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't agree. So microsoft make lou
Hi,
Without wanting to sound too offensive... Hello? Anyone home? The notion
that there is no choice out there is foolish. There is always a choice -
a choice to use MAC, Linux, Unix, ... or not to use a home pc at all.
What? But how will I check my stocks on Yahoo!?! Exactly... We CHOOSE to
li
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 17:08:44 +1300
Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it's the responsibility of both the manufacturer and the distributer.
> That's what happens with your car. If a tyre manufactuer discovers a fault in
> their product, the all the cars are recalled and the tyr
Hi there,
> Dave
>
> Cunningly disguised as a responsible adult...
Aha! You're using the same cover that I use!
Kind regards,
Chris Wilkinson, Christchurch.
22 matches
Mail list logo
