Re: Dinner was great

2004-02-06 Thread Michael
Yes, I agree Jim, having Linux meetings "over dinner" is hardly cheap and I would doubt its value. I wouldn't bother going myself. I like my meetings with a $2 doorcharge and the option to get your broken PC fixed up! There's the value. Michael. At 05:12 p.m. 7/02/2004 +1300, you wrote: On

Re: fdisk

2004-02-06 Thread Paul Wilkins
stm23 wrote: hi paul, thanx for yr advice (very clear & logical :) ) - XP now starts fine. i was worried i was gonna have to reformat my hard-drive! cheers, sam Not a problam. I got to know linux's fdisk quite well last year when Partition Magic fouled up badly (primary partition inside exte

RE: fdisk

2004-02-06 Thread stm23
hi paul, thanx for yr advice (very clear & logical :) ) - XP now starts fine. i was worried i was gonna have to reformat my hard-drive! cheers, sam >= Original Message From [EMAIL PROTECTED] = >stm23 wrote: > >>hi, i'm trying to "unhide" my /dev/hda2 drive (the NTFS XP drive) so that i >

RE: fdisk

2004-02-06 Thread Vik Olliver
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 17:43, stm23 wrote: > hi, thanx for yr reply. how do i su to my admin account? First you just login to some form of command shell. If you have a machine that starts into a graphical desktop, you need to call up a "shell". Then you type: su and hit Enter. It'll ask you for

Re: fdisk

2004-02-06 Thread Paul Wilkins
stm23 wrote: hi, thanx for yr reply. how do i su to my admin account? Type su which stands for switch user. With no parameter it switches you to the root account. -- Paul Wilkins

RE: fdisk

2004-02-06 Thread stm23
hi, thanx for yr reply. how do i su to my admin account? >= Original Message From [EMAIL PROTECTED] = >stm23 wrote: > >>hi, i'm trying to "unhide" my /dev/hda2 drive (the NTFS XP drive) so that i >>can boot XP. i found this advice from a google search: >> >>"All I had to do was boot from

Re: Sigle keypress

2004-02-06 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 12:06:55 +1300, you wrote: >Is there a common, standard way to wait for the press of any single key >in a batch job? > >Vik :v) Hi Vik, I thought a batch job, by definition, was automated, so didn't require any input from the user. However, you may want to look at the 'expec

Re: fdisk

2004-02-06 Thread Paul Wilkins
stm23 wrote: hi, i'm trying to "unhide" my /dev/hda2 drive (the NTFS XP drive) so that i can boot XP. i found this advice from a google search: "All I had to do was boot from a Linux CD-ROM, start fdisk, and change the type of the WinXP file system from 0x17 (Hidden HPFS/NTFS) to 0x7 (HPFS/NTF

Re: Dinner was great

2004-02-06 Thread Jim Cheetham
On Feb 7, 2004, at 4:10 PM, Michael wrote: your hard-luck story is barely on-topic. You'll survive. >> Raj Mahal. The next question is... maybe meetings would be >> better over dinner every month (second month?)? >Sorry. Can't afford to come to meetings anymore if we do that. Not quite sure I agr

fdisk

2004-02-06 Thread stm23
hi, i'm trying to "unhide" my /dev/hda2 drive (the NTFS XP drive) so that i can boot XP. i found this advice from a google search: "All I had to do was boot from a Linux CD-ROM, start fdisk, and change the type of the WinXP file system from 0x17 (Hidden HPFS/NTFS) to 0x7 (HPFS/NTFS). " i've n

Re: disabled drive

2004-02-06 Thread Michael
I don't know for sure because I don't know what Partition Magic does, but it sounds like the drive has been "hidden". If you can boot from the first RedHat CD you might be able to enter the Grub interactive mode (like a command line) to unhide it. Since you haven't installed RedHat you can al

Re: Dinner was great

2004-02-06 Thread Michael
Yuri, while I sympathies with you being broke (I've been there), your hard-luck story is barely on-topic. You'll survive. We can buy your life story when it comes out on DVD. Regards, Michael. At 11:46 a.m. 6/02/2004 +1300, you wrote: > Hiyas > All ye who didn't make it to dinner last night mi

Re: Sigle keypress

2004-02-06 Thread Paul Wilkins
Vik Olliver wrote: On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 15:25, Paul Wilkins wrote: Something like the following? echo "*Press any key* to continue..." perl -e 'system("stty", "cbreak"); getc(STDIN); system("stty", "-cbreak"); ' That's the one ! Now when puddytat tribe steps on my keyboard tonight they'l

Re: Sigle keypress

2004-02-06 Thread Vik Olliver
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 15:25, Paul Wilkins wrote: > Something like the following? > echo "*Press any key* to continue..." > perl -e 'system("stty", "cbreak"); getc(STDIN); system("stty", "-cbreak"); ' That's the one ! Now when puddytat tribe steps on my keyboard tonight they'll get a mixture of fi

Re: Sigle keypress

2004-02-06 Thread Paul Wilkins
Volker Kuhlmann wrote: Is there a common, standard way to wait for the press of any single key in a batch job? Tricky. Old-style (serial) terminals were outright unable to send anything less than a line of input to the computer. What do you call a "batch" job? Usually that means a background

Re: Sigle keypress

2004-02-06 Thread Vik Olliver
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 13:12, Volker Kuhlmann wrote: > > Is there a common, standard way to wait for the press of any single key > > in a batch job? > ... > > kdialog --msgbox "Press any key to continue" Ah, that's key specific. > or write your own short program in C. I think I'll have to. It wo

Re: Sigle keypress

2004-02-06 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
> Is there a common, standard way to wait for the press of any single key > in a batch job? Tricky. Old-style (serial) terminals were outright unable to send anything less than a line of input to the computer. What do you call a "batch" job? Usually that means a background job which gets run when

Re: resizing partitions (was REDHAT 9 INSTALLATION)

2004-02-06 Thread Chad
NTFS Needs a regular defrag just like Fat did. WinXP comes with a really bad defrag util as part of the system tools. (right click drive > properties > tools as always). It may fragment abit slower than fat did but it still fragments alot especially if you install and uninstall alot of stuff. T

Sigle keypress

2004-02-06 Thread Vik Olliver
Is there a common, standard way to wait for the press of any single key in a batch job? Vik :v) -- This PC runs Linux. If you find a virus apparently from me, it has forged the e-mail headers on someone else's machine. Please do not notify me when this occurs. Thanks.

Re: Distribution config

2004-02-06 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
> What I'm hoping can be achieved. > >"That's FooBar Linux you say?" > >Never used it before but if I look over there it'll >say configuring is done through xyz and xyzzy > >"Not a problem." I thought that was called "the docs which came with the system"... Volker -- Volker K

Distribution config

2004-02-06 Thread Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 10:41, Jason Greenwood wrote: That is a bit of a chicken and egg scenario then isn't it? It's all in the docs and failing that, the Mandrake lists will get you an answer usually within 10 minutes. I am not so sure of an easy way to fix what you describe. I always try and h

Re: CLUG meetings: A future or not

2004-02-06 Thread Robert Fisher
I believe that the strengh of this LUG is the informality. Do we need prearranged meeting dates? I guess the danger if we don't is that we may fall apart. I am happy to use this medium (email) for Linux related issues, questions and answers, have workshops and installfests, arrange meetings for

Re: DHCP setup failing

2004-02-06 Thread Chris Wilkinson
Hi there, Zane Gilmore wrote: This is extremely annoying guys. Please do *not* hit reply to a list message then change the subject. For those whose use threading this practice really stuffs things up. (and if you're on this list and not using it you're crazy IMHO) When you do that you are "hijack

Re: resizing partitions (was REDHAT 9 INSTALLATION)

2004-02-06 Thread Chris Wilkinson
Hi there, Zane Gilmore wrote: On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 14:57, Chad wrote: Mandrake 9.2 and later (not sure about 9.1) can do non-destructive resizing of ntfs you need to defrag in windows then just use the Mandrake tools. I thought that defragging was reasonably irrelevant on NTFS like ext2/3 be

Re: DHCP setup failing

2004-02-06 Thread Zane Gilmore
This is extremely annoying guys. Please do *not* hit reply to a list message then change the subject. For those whose use threading this practice really stuffs things up. (and if you're on this list and not using it you're crazy IMHO) When you do that you are "hijacking the thread" as your messag

Re: resizing partitions (was REDHAT 9 INSTALLATION)

2004-02-06 Thread Zane Gilmore
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 14:57, Chad wrote: > Mandrake 9.2 and later (not sure about 9.1) can do non-destructive resizing of > ntfs you need to defrag in windows then just use the Mandrake tools. I thought that defragging was reasonably irrelevant on NTFS like ext2/3 because of the way they work.

usb external hardrive

2004-02-06 Thread Paul William
Hi all, I would like to purchase a usb external 5.25" hardrive bay. The ones DSE sells are linux compatible (2.4.19). Anyone had any problems with these? Comments? Thanks Paul -- .''`. Paul William : :' :Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do

Re: CLUG meetings: A future or not

2004-02-06 Thread Nick Rout
Instead of asking the questions, make some suggestions! the purpose of this list is communication. Tell us what yo want Trev (sorry I didn't get a cahnce to chat to you the other night, but even if I did, you still need to tell the group what you want!) This is the place, and the chance to do it.

CLUG meetings: A future or not

2004-02-06 Thread Trev
There have been a lot of suggestions but no action! Dinner was great, but So what are we doing: Are we going to have an AGM this year ?. Are we going to elected a committee ?. Are we going to have _any meetings_ at all ?. Or are we _NOT_ going to have a Linux User Group with meetings at

Re: 2.4 config -> 2.6??

2004-02-06 Thread Nick Rout
make menuconfig and choose what options you want. I did not try and transfer my 2.4 .config to 2.6, but i was familiar with what I needed in a kernel. On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 19:40:54+1300 Steve Holdoway<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 22:24:25 +1300, you wrote: > > >On Thu, Feb 05,

Re: DHCP setup failing

2004-02-06 Thread Nick Rout
read the previous emaisl caefully you were trying to set your network to .1 . The correct network address os .0 On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:42:46+1300 Nathan Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for all the help, still having problems though, may have > stuffed the install of the DHCPD rpm, I'm