On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:02:28 +1200, you wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:14, Steve Holdoway wrote:
>> SMTP... now that's what 98% of all known statistics use for
>> _sending_ mail?
>
>Where does that sent mail go?
>
>RFC 821
>--
>The SM
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:14, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> SMTP... now that's what 98% of all known statistics use for
> _sending_ mail?
Where does that sent mail go?
RFC 821
--
The SMTP design is based on the following model of communicatio
Matthew Gregan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 04:41:35PM +1200, Andrew Tarr wrote:
>
> > So I reinstalled Debian from the installation beta on my laptop, and
>
> Was this a fresh reinstallation, or have you restored files from backup?
It was a fresh installation. /home an
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:54:01 +1200, you wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 11:10:59PM +1200, Steve Holdoway wrote:
>> FWIW, In the 20+ years that I've been using *nices for a living, it
>> wasn't until I used Linux that I even heard of the wheel group.
>
>The wheel group hasn't been strongly adopted
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:10, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> If you're using debian, it might be worth running an apt-get update,
> just to see if there's something out of kilter, I must admit to
> running a b*stardised version of Fedora, which I know isn't PC in this
> group (^:
nothing unPC about that as
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:54, Matthew Gregan wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 11:10:59PM +1200, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> > FWIW, In the 20+ years that I've been using *nices for a living, it
> > wasn't until I used Linux that I even heard of the wheel group.
>
> The wheel group hasn't been strongly ado
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 11:10:59PM +1200, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> FWIW, In the 20+ years that I've been using *nices for a living, it
> wasn't until I used Linux that I even heard of the wheel group.
The wheel group hasn't been strongly adopted in Linux. Any Linux use of
the wheel group is derive
mea culpa, Matthew & Andrew are perfectly correct, I did not read the original
post properly. My apologies for clogging the ariwaves. I'll shut up now.
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 22:28, Andrew Tarr wrote:
> Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:07, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 15:43:00 +1200, you wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 14:38, Nick Rout wrote:
>> err what pop server? I don't have one. a strange assumption. and
>> anyway if you do get your mail via pop, the bandwidth is already
>> wasted getting it to the popserver.
>
>Apologies, my assumption[1]
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 22:28:31 +1200, you wrote:
>
>Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:07, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
>> > On Saturday 10 April 2004 16:41, Andrew Tarr wrote:
>> > > su: Authentication Failure
>> > > Sorry.
>> >
>> > On ye olde Unix, and some Linux dist
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:07, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 April 2004 16:41, Andrew Tarr wrote:
> > > su: Authentication Failure
> > > Sorry.
> >
> > On ye olde Unix, and some Linux distributions, you have to be a member of
> > the wheel group
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 04:41:35PM +1200, Andrew Tarr wrote:
> So I reinstalled Debian from the installation beta on my laptop, and
Was this a fresh reinstallation, or have you restored files from backup?
Are the permissions on /bin/su set to 4755?
> Now I can no longer 'su'. I can log in as ro
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 06:56:48PM +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:07, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > On ye olde Unix, and some Linux distributions, you have to be a member of
> > the wheel group to be able to su. I'm now sure if this is current Debian
> > policy, but it's worth a
13 matches
Mail list logo
