Re: 1280x1024 framebuffer

2004-09-12 Thread Chris Wilkinson
Hi there, Nick Rout wrote: thats very odd, because fb's are so common these days. frankly i've never used a combination of framebuffer and lilo, i am a grubby myself. i'm sure i've seen append="vga=788" in lilo configs before though. Yes you have, but this is from my current lilo.conf... image=/boo

Re: Right way to compile Debian packages?

2004-09-12 Thread Gareth Williams
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:32:00 +1200, Jim Cheetham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul William wrote: > >> I'll be caught out when an upgrade happens, won't I? > > > > Not as long as your package version does not conflict with Debian > > packages i.e. create a package with the version x.ab-zy_jim such

Re: Right way to compile Debian packages?

2004-09-12 Thread Jim Cheetham
Paul William wrote: I'll be caught out when an upgrade happens, won't I? Not as long as your package version does not conflict with Debian packages i.e. create a package with the version x.ab-zy_jim such as 3.36-11_jim. Than I'll be caught out when a security upgrade comes along, and I don't get

Re: 1280x1024 framebuffer

2004-09-12 Thread Nick Rout
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:28:57 +1200 Gareth Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:25:24 +1200, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > thats very odd, because fb's are so common these days. > > > > frankly i've never used a combination of framebuffer and lilo, i am a > > gr

Re: 1280x1024 framebuffer

2004-09-12 Thread Gareth Williams
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:25:24 +1200, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thats very odd, because fb's are so common these days. > > frankly i've never used a combination of framebuffer and lilo, i am a > grubby myself. > > i'm sure i've seen append="vga=788" in lilo configs before though. tr

Re: 1280x1024 framebuffer

2004-09-12 Thread Nick Rout
thats very odd, because fb's are so common these days. frankly i've never used a combination of framebuffer and lilo, i am a grubby myself. i'm sure i've seen append="vga=788" in lilo configs before though. there are a few patches applied by gentoo to lilo but none that i can see that realte to

Re: Right way to compile Debian packages?

2004-09-12 Thread Paul William
I'll be caught out when an upgrade happens, won't I? Not as long as your package version does not conflict with Debian packages i.e. create a package with the version x.ab-zy_jim such as 3.36-11_jim. Have a look at http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/index.en.html Cheers Paul Gentoo?

Re: Right way to compile Debian packages?

2004-09-12 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:52, Jim Cheetham wrote: > Gentoo? Without doubt! -- Sincerely etc., Christopher Sawtell

Re: 1280x1024 framebuffer

2004-09-12 Thread Paul William
The gentoo docs said to add the following line to lilo.conf: append="vga=788" When I run lilo I get the following error: Fatal: APPEND or LITERAL may not contain "vga=" After googling I found out that an error is generated if 'vga' exists in the append="" conf option: Changes from version 22.2 to

Re: Right way to compile Debian packages?

2004-09-12 Thread Paul William
I have not created a deb in a while so I cannot guarantee that I have listed all the steps ... 1)download the Debian package source 2)untar it, 3)run ./configure with whatever options you want 4)change the deb version, I can't remember if its in a conf file or an option of dpkg-buildpackage to a

RE: Right way to compile Debian packages?

2004-09-12 Thread Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC)
-Original Message- From: Jim Cheetham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 13 September 2004 4:53 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Right way to compile Debian packages? What's the *right* way to rebuild a Debian package with different options? i.e. they ship with E

Right way to compile Debian packages?

2004-09-12 Thread Jim Cheetham
What's the *right* way to rebuild a Debian package with different options? i.e. they ship with Exim, but it doesn't have MySQL support (there are other answers possible, but this is an example, not a problem) I'd like to recompile the shipped Exim with different options, and then install properl

Re: 1280x1024 framebuffer

2004-09-12 Thread Nick Rout
add vga=magic number to your boot line magic number is: 640x480 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 8 bpp 769 771 773 775 16 bpp 785 788 791 794 32 bpp 786 789 792 795 sorry that may not format well, i took it from this page: http://

RE: 1280x1024 framebuffer

2004-09-12 Thread C. Falconer
You need to use framebuffer on the console. Google will tell you more, but you need to compile support for that into your kernel. Go from there. -Original Message- From: Paul William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 13 September 2004 4:19 p.m. To: CLUG Subject: 1280x1024 framebu

1280x1024 framebuffer

2004-09-12 Thread Paul William
Hi All, I recently bought a 17" LCD monitor which has a 'native' resolution of 1280x1024. I would like my ttys/consoles to have a resolution of 1280x1024. I think it currently has a res of 640x480. To load the framebuffer my /etc/modules contains: vga16fb fbcon What can I do to get a res of 1280x

Re: Scotland: Thanks for all your advice

2004-09-12 Thread Jim Cheetham
Dave Mateer wrote: Distro: Mandrake10 Do you think you could fix your timezone as well? Your mail claims "Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:40:07 +0100" ... that time hasn't happened yet ... :-) Any mandrake users know the easiest way to fix timezone for the user and/or machine? -jim

Re: Can't mount FAT

2004-09-12 Thread Douglas Royds
Problem completely solved. There was also a line in /etc/fstab that specifically mentioned /dev/sda1. It now refers to /dev/sda, and the USB drive was mounted at start-up. Hooray. I'll re-read the recent thread about USB drives and hotplug, and see if I can sort this out once and for all - just

Re: Can't mount FAT

2004-09-12 Thread Douglas Royds
Modest victory! I have just succeeded in mounting the shared partition, so the problem wasn't with the vfat module. That one was a problem with my brain. I do have the usb-storage, vfat, msdos and fat modules loaded, so I think that bit's all sorted: usb-storage58528 0 usb-ohci

Re: Can't mount FAT

2004-09-12 Thread Nick Rout
emergeing now On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:53:36 +1200 Douglas Royds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Nick Rout wrote: > > hmmm i never heard of those tools, and they are not on my system. what > > package are sg_scan and sginfo in? > > > Package: sg3-utils > Priority: optional > Section: admin > I

Re: Can't mount FAT

2004-09-12 Thread Douglas Royds
Nick Rout wrote: hmmm i never heard of those tools, and they are not on my system. what package are sg_scan and sginfo in? Package: sg3-utils Priority: optional Section: admin Installed-Size: 988 Maintainer: Eric Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: i386 Version: 1.05-2 Replaces: sg-utils D

How to associate Firefox with html files

2004-09-12 Thread Douglas Royds
I can't convince Gnome to stop using Epiphany as the default viewer for html files. The default application shown in Nautilus is "Web Browser". Under the Gnome Preferred Applications tool, I have selected "Debian sensible browser". I am unable to select Firefox directly in the Custom Web Browse

Re: Can't mount FAT

2004-09-12 Thread Nick Rout
hmmm i never heard of those tools, and they are not on my system. what package are sg_scan and sginfo in? (you can see by going: whereis sg_scan - that will give you the full path to sg_scan, something like /usr/sbin/sg_scan then rpm -qf /usr/bin/sg_scan alternatively rpm -qf $(which sg_scan) i

RE: Can't mount FAT

2004-09-12 Thread David Kirk
Douglas, > Can you remind me what the command is to see all your partitions, and > the types that the system thinks they are? I thought it was fdisk -l, > but that returned silence. On my SuSE 9.1 box under my desk, I did a lsmod > before and the plugged in a usb key. I mounted it and did lsmo

Re: Can't mount FAT

2004-09-12 Thread Douglas Royds
Doh! You're right about /dev/sda, but it didn't help. msdos filesystem didn't work either. Of course, I can't mount the shared fat partition either. Here's what the scsi system has to say: $ sudo sg_scan -i /dev/sg0: scsi1 channel=0 id=0 lun=0 [em] type=0 USB Flash Drive 1.12 [wi

Re: Can't mount FAT

2004-09-12 Thread Nick Rout
usb sticks are often formatted msdos, not vfat, try -t msdos. also somethimes they are not partitioned in the normal way, and the filesystem may be on /dev/sda not /dev/sda1 keep fiddling. On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:56:21 +1200 Douglas Royds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't mount any FAT part

Can't mount FAT

2004-09-12 Thread Douglas Royds
I can't mount any FAT partitions - neither my shared FAT partition nor my USB flash-drive: $sudo mount -t vfat /dev/sda1 usb mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda1, or too many mounted file systems This install just doesn't seem to know anything about fat. Is there s

Scotland: Thanks for all your advice

2004-09-12 Thread Dave Mateer
Hi Thanks for the advice everyone gave me on which Linux apps to run, which adsl router to buy... apologies for not replying individually - a 31st mega birthday (mine), and serious job hunting have taken over my life! So, I'm into week 2 of running a Linux desktop. It is not so bad as I thou

Re: More Cat 5e goodness (was Re: [OT] Phone over data cable - howto?)

2004-09-12 Thread Andrew Errington
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:43, you wrote: > How much did the video baluns cost? > > I have a pair here that set me back $150 each a couple years back... But > they do stereo audio too. ISTR they cost about $20 each (and of course you have to buy two at a time). I bought them from Oz http://www.eql.

RE: More Cat 5e goodness (was Re: [OT] Phone over data cable - howto?)

2004-09-12 Thread C. Falconer
How much did the video baluns cost? I have a pair here that set me back $150 each a couple years back... But they do stereo audio too. -Original Message- From: Andrew Errington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 13 September 2004 9:36 a.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: More Cat 5e

More Cat 5e goodness (was Re: [OT] Phone over data cable - howto?)

2004-09-12 Thread Andrew Errington
At the weekend I installed a webcam. It is a desktop video camera (not USB and not digital). How to get the video signal from the back of the house to the server room [1]? Answer: just crawl around in the loft until you are completely black with dust, dragging two lengths of Cat 5e with you.