Col wrote:
> That would make it easy! I tried
>
> echo $4
>
> but it displayed nothing (redhat 8)
The script needs to be executable, and the first line needs to contain a
path to the interpreter. Also I am not sure what it does with standard
output so it may be a good idea to redirect that t
On Sat, 01 Feb 2003 15:14, Col wrote:
> Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:01, Col wrote:
> >>Is there an easier/better way for a user to obtain ppp0 ip address than
> >>
> >>IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | cut -d" " -f1 | head -n 1)
> >
> > Quoting the pppd man page
> >
> > /etc/pp
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:01, Col wrote:
Is there an easier/better way for a user to obtain ppp0 ip address than
IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | cut -d" " -f1 | head -n 1)
Quoting the pppd man page
/etc/ppp/ip-up
A program or script which is executed when
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 04:19:11PM +1300, Michael JasonSmith wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:12, Carl Cerecke wrote:
> > Anybody have any Linux questions?
> GNOME or KDE?
what happened to:
emacs or vi?
greetings, martin.
--
interested in doing pike programming, sTeam/caudium/pike/roxen trainin
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 14:12, Nick Rout wrote:
> For heavens sake John, if you read the list properly you would know that
> the people on this list (ie "CLUG" to the extent that it exists) don't
> feel the need for anything more formal than we now have. What
> unfulfilled need are you trying to addr
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:01, Col wrote:
> Is there an easier/better way for a user to obtain ppp0 ip address than
>
> IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | cut -d" " -f1 | head -n 1)
Quoting the pppd man page
/etc/ppp/ip-up
A program or script which is executed when the link
is
h (raised from door
> > entries and maybe some small profit (loss?) on the installfest). Our one
> > true asset is the knowledge of the people who participate. No committee
> > is going to ever control that, particularly in the free (speech) world
> > of linux/open source.
>
Col wrote:
I have one ( trying to learn bash scripting )
Is there an easier/better way for a user to obtain ppp0 ip address than
IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | cut -d" " -f1 | head -n 1)
IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | awk '{print $1}')
Adrian
a relativelty modest amount of cash (raised from door
> entries and maybe some small profit (loss?) on the installfest). Our one
> true asset is the knowledge of the people who participate. No committee
> is going to ever control that, particularly in the free (speech) world
> of linux/
Sounds good to me
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 09:03, Jason Greenwood wrote:
> Thanks Tim =)
>
> What does the list think of this idea??
>
> Cheers
>
> J
>
> Tim Wright wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Jason wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I still think a meeting in 2 halves is best. First half GUI and app
Carl Cerecke wrote:
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
Personally, I have got neither the time nor the emotional energy to get
involved with either a strictured, or a structured organisation. I'll
just
have to walk away from it if that happens. I hope not.
Funnily enough, the 5 people "elected" to th
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:29, Carl Cerecke wrote:
> Michael JasonSmith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:12, Carl Cerecke wrote:
> > >Anybody have any Linux questions?
> > GNOME or KDE?
> For you, Michael, twm.
socks:~# ps auxw | grep twm
criggie 763 0.0 0.1 3228 1464 ?SJan30
Michael JasonSmith wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:12, Carl Cerecke wrote:
Anybody have any Linux questions?
GNOME or KDE?
For you, Michael, twm.
Cheers,
Carl.
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:12, Carl Cerecke wrote:
> Anybody have any Linux questions?
GNOME or KDE?
:-P
--
Michael JasonSmith http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/~mpj17/
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
Personally, I have got neither the time nor the emotional energy to get
involved with either a strictured, or a structured organisation. I'll just
have to walk away from it if that happens. I hope not.
Funnily enough, the 5 people "elected" to the committee probably h
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 13:52, John S Veitch wrote:
> Nick Elder :
> "I MOVE THAT THE CLUG MEETING THIS COMING WEDNESDAY BE A GENERAL
> MEETING AND THAT AT THIS MEETING WE FORM AN EXECUTIVE !"
>
> Christopher Sawtell:
> "I second that!"
While I did indeed write that, I want to make it perfectly clear
John wrote:
> There should be nothing controversial in the above suggestion. All
> the "power" of the Executive Committee is in the hands of the five
> people already appointed who group members already know, respect and
> trust. Since we are doing some new things it might be beneficial to
>
ch) world
of linux/open source.
Man I'm spending my 2 cent pieces fast!
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 13:52:13 +1300
John S Veitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Everyone
>
> It's clear that there is no CLUG, but many people before me have
> expressed surprise at that and
Hello Everyone
It's clear that there is no CLUG, but many people before me have
expressed surprise at that and like me have looked to improve the
function of the local Linux community by doing some very obvious
things.
Nick Elder :
"I MOVE THAT THE CLUG MEETING THIS COMING WEDN
No worries mate. A bit of friendly banter keeps the heart (and mind) in
shape!! I look forward to seeing how things work at the next (actually I
think it's 2 meetings away, since the next meeting is a "help" and
"troubleshooting" meeting right?) meeting.
Regards,
Jason Greenwood
Gareth Willia
Jason,
I think, from memory, I was one of the participants in that 'GUI vs CLI'
flamewar (and not on your side either ;) However that's long forgotten, I
just wanted to say I think your idea of meeting topics being oriented in 2
halves is a good one, and I'm sorry if I didn't speak up at the tim
man as that came thru i was writing to the other committee members
suggesting we arrange just that!
good on you jason.
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:31:24 +1300
Jason Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Done, I volunteer for the first half. I wil be putting a selection of
> topics together in the n
Done, I volunteer for the first half. I wil be putting a selection of
topics together in the next couple of days. As I doubt there will be
time to discuss them all, I will ask that the list vote for a couple of
them so I can select the ones people want to hear about most. Once that
is done, I w
Jason Greenwood wrote:
What does the list think of this idea??
The list thinks that the meeting after next has no speaker,
and you are volunteering to do a half-meeting talk :-)
Thanks.
Now we need another speaker for the other half.
Cheers,
Carl.
It gets my vote
Lance B
From: Jason Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: There is no CLUG
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:03:25 +1300
Thanks Tim =)
What does the list think of this idea??
Cheers
J
Tim Wright wrote:
On Fri,
Thanks Tim =)
What does the list think of this idea??
Cheers
J
Tim Wright wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Jason wrote:
I still think a meeting in 2 halves is best. First half GUI and app
based discussions/presentations. Second half, CLI/programming oriented
discussion. We start t
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Jason wrote:
> I still think a meeting in 2 halves is best. First half GUI and app
> based discussions/presentations. Second half, CLI/programming oriented
> discussion. We start the halves at preset times, then, if people didn't
> want to stay for the second half they could l
> Will do as soon as it propagates to the archive.
>
> Wow I bugger off to Auckland for a few days and CLUG
> gets a organised!
Arr.. there's the first problem.. you went to
auckland.. :)
=
For Linux CD's check out http://www.xsolutions.co.nz
http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies
- Wha
Replies quoted below
Jason, here http://lists.ethernal.org/cantlug-0208/msg00606.html you
offered to talk on one of those subjects that interested you, what
happenned? maybe you felt you needed to be asked. HAving the dubious
honour of being on the meeting committee I'm gonna get you along f
Will do as soon as it propagates to the archive.
Wow I bugger off to Auckland for a few days and CLUG gets a organised!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'll second Carl's comment. I will add that now people have wanted to
> organise meetings a little better, there are p
Jason, here http://lists.ethernal.org/cantlug-0208/msg00606.html you
offered to talk on one of those subjects that interested you, what
happenned? maybe you felt you needed to be asked. HAving the dubious
honour of being on the meeting committee I'm gonna get you along for
some info about the stuff
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 05:01:46PM +1300, Jason Greenwood wrote:
> was not. To recap my feelings and what I thought the CLUG should include
> more of, see the archives here:
> http://lists.ethernal.org/cantlug-0208/msg00575.html
Again, my archives pop up, and I completely forget they exist... I m
I wanted a LOT of things ;) But then I am a demanding chap, aren't I?? No,
but seriously, Nick, your (as I saw it), ahem, sometimes abrasive and forthright
nature frankly annoyed me. I have since gotten to know you better and though
you still sometimes annoy me (as I surely do you), I have also
Not wanting to go over old ground here Jason, but IIRC you wanted more
talks on gui type software, which quickly degenerated into a CLI/GUI
flamewar oops I mean discussion.
I think someone may have suggested that you organise or conduct talks on
the areas that interested you, if that has resulted
I will not bore the list as I am reasonably sure I have made it quite clear
what I would like the CLUG to do differently. IMHO, these concerns have fallen
on more than deaf ears, they have fallen on vehemently contrary ears. That
is totally fine, I guess I was outnumbered. As I said, I am not t
Jason Greenwood wrote:
One problem with your little hypothesis/statement. It leaves no room for
change/progression/evolution. All things change in time, that is the way
of life.
The list, and the activity that surround it, has changed a lot since
the list was first started.
Also, I had a sort-
If you were the committee of one, what would you change?
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:01:35 +1300
Jason Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One problem with your little hypothesis/statement. It leaves no room for
> change/progression/evolution. All things change in time, that is the way
> of life
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 16:01, Jason Greenwood wrote:
> One problem with your little hypothesis/statement. It leaves no room for
> change/progression/evolution. All things change in time, that is the way
> of life.
>
> Jason Greenwood
You have a point. I do think that we need to be able to change
o with lack of leadership/structure/formality on the
mailing list.
Remember. There is no CLUG. So don't complain about it.
That is how it works.
And I like it.
Cheers,
Carl.
P.S. These are my opinions today. They may be subject to
change tomorrow.
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tim Wright wrote:
> Can we put a link from the website to them...next to the "i was a newbie"
> one. We could call it "a brief history of Clug".
aaah, commenting on my own comment. bad eh :)
by "them" I meant Carl's comment.
Tim Wright
Assistant Lecturer
Department of Comp
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Carl Cerecke wrote:
> Remember. There is no CLUG. So don't complain about it.
>
> That is how it works.
> And I like it.
I'll second Carl's comment. I will add that now people have wanted to
organise meetings a little better, there are people d
hing much gets done by mailing-list
members apart from meetings (and the installfest) has nothing
to do with lack of leadership/structure/formality on the
mailing list.
Remember. There is no CLUG. So don't complain about it.
That is how it works.
And I like it.
Cheers,
Carl.
P.S. These are m
42 matches
Mail list logo
