On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Zane Gilmore wrote:
If you have multiple users on your network then the UIDs have to be
consistent across ALL machines using the NFS sharing.
If they aren't then the permission hell you can get into is vicious.
I have been a victim of this so many time now that I will onl
On 3/13/08, Zane Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Carter wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Yuri wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > For linux to linux mounts I use nfs. Simpler.
>
> I disagree completely.
> If you have multiple users on your network then the UIDs have to be
> consistent across ALL machine
John Carter wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, yuri wrote:
For linux to linux mounts I use nfs. Simpler.
I disagree completely.
If you have multiple users on your network then the UIDs have to be consistent across ALL machines
using the NFS sharing.
If they aren't then the permission hell you
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, yuri wrote:
Is there any advantage to using samba in a Linux-only environment?
At the moment if I want to browse any other machine on the LAN I use
the "fish:" url in konqueror.
1) from a user's point of view, is "smb:" any easier to use than
"fish:" in konqueror?
2) from
On 3/11/08, yuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any advantage to using samba in a Linux-only environment?
It obeys symbolic links correctly, but the price you pay is that it is
slower than to NFS.
> At the moment if I want to browse any other machine on the LAN I use
> the "fish:" url in ko
PS
> for the only shareable resource on my LAN.
How do I mount a filesystem permanently and in which neither system
complain if either the server or the client reboot using ssh?
>
> Yuri
>
> On 11/03/2008, John Carter wrote:
>> Say "troubleshooting samba" to Google...
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:51 PM, yuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any advantage to using samba in a Linux-only environment?
> 1) from a user's point of view, is "smb:" any easier to use than
> "fish:" in konqueror?
> 2) from an admin's POV, is samba any better than running sshd on ever
an admin's POV, is samba any better than running sshd on every box?
Or, are we talking six of one, half dozen of the other?
I understand that samba also shares other resources, but I have CUPS
for the only shareable resource on my LAN.
Yuri
On 11/03/2008, John Carter wrote:
> Say "
p.m.
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Troubleshooting Samba
Say "troubleshooting samba" to Google... and you will be Lucky.
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/book/ch09_01.html
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, David Lowe wrote:
> I know it's quite low-level in th
Say "troubleshooting samba" to Google... and you will be Lucky.
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/book/ch09_01.html
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, David Lowe wrote:
I know it's quite low-level in the geek stakes, but would someone be able to
present something on configuring Sam
10 matches
Mail list logo
