Feigning erudition, stayler wrote:
% On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:41:12 -0500, Kurt Wall wrote:
%
%
% I've built GCC more times the last year than I care to count, and I have
% yet to blow up my system compiler.
%
% Kurt,
%
% I am wodering, do you reference the new GCC during builds or do you
%
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, well. My one and only Red Hat system is also my one and only
Red Hat Network free subscription.
RH just sent me an email stating that I have 7 days to fill out a survey
to extend my demo account another 60 days. The implication in the
email
My $deity, its horrifying that Redhat actually wants to make a profit!
Such bastards.
Sorry, but i don't see how this is a bad thing. Granted, i haven't seen
the actual email in question, but i suspect that ftp://updates.redhat.com
will remain freely accessible, and that anyone wanting automagic
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:13:35AM -0500, Net Llama! wrote:
My $deity, its horrifying that Redhat actually wants to make a profit!
Such bastards.
Sorry, but i don't see how this is a bad thing. Granted, i haven't seen
the actual email in question, but i suspect that ftp://updates.redhat.com
---BeginMessage---
I've tagged the XFree86 4.3.0 release. The tag is xf-4_3_0, and the
branch tag associated with this release is xf-4_3-branch. This should
all be visible from the anoncvs repository soon. This marks the closing
of the 4.3.0 release, and I'd like to thank all who have
Douglas Hunley has just updated http://www.linux-sxs.org/index2.html to incorporate
the following:
Updated to include Klaus\' idea about new info box
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
On Thursday 27 February 2003 10:13, Net Llama! wrote:
My $deity, its horrifying that Redhat actually wants to make a profit!
Such bastards.
Sorry, but i don't see how this is a bad thing. Granted, i haven't seen
the actual email in question, but i suspect that ftp://updates.redhat.com
will
Lee wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but Red Hat is open-source isn't it? I seem to
recall that Caldera went down a similiar road and their apologists applauded
them for wanting to make money so they could continue churning out
open-source for a fee. Now the son of Caldera (SCO) wants to sue
On 02/27/03 17:12, Lee wrote:
On Thursday 27 February 2003 10:13, Net Llama! wrote:
My $deity, its horrifying that Redhat actually wants to make a profit!
Such bastards.
Sorry, but i don't see how this is a bad thing. Granted, i haven't seen
the actual email in question, but i suspect that
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As you can see, the front page has a new look. Klaus came up with a wonderful
idea, so we've implemented it. I think you'll all agree that the new
front-end is cleaner and more informative. Kudos to Klaus!
- --
Douglas J
Sorry about the off-topic question, but my wife will be grateful for
possible help.
My wife has a conventional 3 1/2 floppy that she formatted eons ago on
an old Compaq computer. She says
a) the old Compaq would read floppies formatted on an IBM PC.
b) floppies formatted on her Compaq could not
Lee wrote:
snip
Correct me if I'm wrong but Red Hat is open-source isn't it?
Yes, but that does NOT mean free. It means that they can do whatever
they want, whether it's selling one copy a year at 1 million dollars, a
million copies at one dollar, or giving it away. The only requirement is
Feigning erudition, Lee wrote:
% On Thursday 27 February 2003 10:13, Net Llama! wrote:
% My $deity, its horrifying that Redhat actually wants to make a profit!
% Such bastards.
%
% Sorry, but i don't see how this is a bad thing. Granted, i haven't seen
% the actual email in question, but i
On Thursday 27 February 2003 08:13 am, Net Llama! wrote:
My $deity, its horrifying that Redhat actually wants to make a profit!
Such bastards.
Sorry, but i don't see how this is a bad thing. Granted, i haven't seen
the actual email in question, but i suspect that ftp://updates.redhat.com
Remember, you don't have to use their services.
If you find their services worth paying for, then pay for them.
Nobody is making anybody buy their services, except of course MS.
Joel
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feigning erudition, Tony Alfrey wrote:
% Sorry about the off-topic question, but my wife will be grateful for
% possible help.
% My wife has a conventional 3 1/2 floppy that she formatted eons ago on
% an old Compaq computer. She says
% a) the old Compaq would read floppies formatted on an IBM
They still do. They still have proprietary hardware (SCSI drives, etc.)
and the brain dead concept of putting a bunch of the bios and stuff on disk
so you can't get to it if the disk fails and it eats up a bunch of your
disk space.
Kurt Wall wrote:
Feigning erudition, Tony Alfrey wrote:
%
begin Tony Alfrey's quote:
| Sorry about the off-topic question, but my wife will be grateful
| for possible help.
| My wife has a conventional 3 1/2 floppy that she formatted eons
| ago on an old Compaq computer. She says
| a) the old Compaq would read floppies formatted on an IBM PC.
| b)
begin Lee's quote:
| Now the son of Caldera (SCO)
| wants to sue everybody who uses linux.
might you point to even the faintest evidence that any of the above
accusation is even remotely true?
--
dep
http://www.linuxandmain.com -- outside the box, barely within
the envelope, and no animated
On Thursday 27 February 2003 06:57 pm, Kurt Wall wrote:
Feigning erudition, Tony Alfrey wrote:
snip
Possibly. Can you dd the contents off the floppy into a file and then
poke through the file looking for the data that you want?
$ dd if=/dev/fd0 of=/some/darn/file
Looked promising, but I got
Feigning erudition, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
% They still do. They still have proprietary hardware (SCSI drives, etc.)
% and the brain dead concept of putting a bunch of the bios and stuff on disk
% so you can't get to it if the disk fails and it eats up a bunch of your
% disk space.
Bleah.
On 02/27/03 19:33, Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Thursday 27 February 2003 06:57 pm, Kurt Wall wrote:
Feigning erudition, Tony Alfrey wrote:
snip
Possibly. Can you dd the contents off the floppy into a file and then
poke through the file looking for the data that you want?
$ dd if=/dev/fd0
Yup and now they are part of HP the brain deadness will only increase!
Kurt Wall wrote:
Feigning erudition, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
% They still do. They still have proprietary hardware (SCSI drives, etc.)
% and the brain dead concept of putting a bunch of the bios and stuff on
disk % so
On Thursday 27 February 2003 07:06 pm, dep wrote:
begin Tony Alfrey's quote:
snip
| My wife has a conventional 3 1/2 floppy that she formatted eons
| ago on an old Compaq computer. She says
| a) the old Compaq would read floppies formatted on an IBM PC.
| b) floppies formatted on her
Kurt or someone posted a note that used the 720 device in /dev.
Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Thursday 27 February 2003 07:06 pm, dep wrote:
begin Tony Alfrey's quote:
snip
. .
it says Sony High Density MFD-2HD. I have some old 720k macintosh
disks that say MFD-2DD ( double density ). It
Well it seems the promised Linux version of PMMAil is pretty much a
piece of Vaporware so I'm looking to transfer some of my old PMMail
folders to Sylpheed. PMMail uses directories and a somewhat strange
way of tagging msg's as individual files. I understand that Sylpheed
is similar but the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:34:21 -0800 (PST), stayler wrote:
Well it seems the promised Linux version of PMMAil is pretty much a
piece of Vaporware so I'm looking to transfer some of my old PMMail
folders to Sylpheed.
I though that I was the only
On Thursday 27 February 2003 07:52 pm, Kurt Wall wrote:
Feigning erudition, dep wrote:
snip
%
% is it a 720k floppy? eons ago, those were the 3.5 floppies.
Hey, there's a thought:
dd if=/dev/fd0u720 of=/blah/blarg
Kurt
Geeze, you guys think of everything!
But still the same results.
28 matches
Mail list logo
