Collins Richey wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:57:03 -0500
Klaus-Peter Schrage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Now, Red Hat 8.0 already has 2.3.2 (-4.80) via up2date, which is a
big>nuisance to the wine people (and me as a wine addict): wine
simply won't>run under glib 2.3.x, and it s
begin Kurt Wall's quote:
| Eew.
until we get it all sorted out, we have a placeholder:
http://www.linuxandmain.com
which ought to get their attention, for several reasons.
--
dep
http://www.linuxandmain.com -- outside the box, barely within
the envelope, and no animated paperclip anywhere.
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 10:15, ronnie gauthier wrote:
> >From my httpd.conf,
I noticed after several attemps at httpd.conf that when starting apache
I get :
[Tue Mar 25 22:20:32 2003] [warn] module mod_php4.c is already added,
skipping
[Tue Mar 25 22:20:32 2003] [warn] module mod_ssl.c is already
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, David A. Bandel wrote:
> With non-VLSM CIDR, we can't use /#. We will also get very large
> headaches trying to calculate which IPs are found on a network with
> absurd netmasks like 255.255.255.123. If you don't think this is valid,
> you can try it on your network and see
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:57:03 -0500
Klaus-Peter Schrage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Net Llama! wrote:
>
> >>Now, Red Hat 8.0 already has 2.3.2 (-4.80) via up2date, which is a
> >big>nuisance to the wine people (and me as a wine addict): wine
> >simply won't>run under glib 2.3.x, and it seems to b
An unnamed Administration source, Condon Thomas A KPWA, wrote:
%
% Net Llama! wrote:
% > Last week there was a thread on the Linux kernel mailng list comparing
% > XFS, reiserFS & ext3:
% > http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/latest.html#13
% >
% > looks like ext3 came in last, resierFS first, XFS
An unnamed Administration source, Net Llama!, wrote:
% On Tue, 24 Mar 2003, Ted Ozolins wrote:
[mysql woes]
% i realize that this doesn't solve your problem at all, but postgreSQL is
% an order of magnitude easier to setup & admin than mysql, in my
% experience. unless you really, really need my
An unnamed Administration source, dep, wrote:
% begin Net Llama!'s quote:
%
% | mind sharing how you were 0wn3d ?
%
% apparently an exploit in php-nuke or, possibly, php. they didn't get
% the whole thing -- just one very limited posting account. they also
% did not get the logfiles, which ar
begin Net Llama!'s quote:
| mind sharing how you were 0wn3d ?
apparently an exploit in php-nuke or, possibly, php. they didn't get
the whole thing -- just one very limited posting account. they also
did not get the logfiles, which are being prepared for our friends at
the doj. they probably
On 03/25/03 19:26, dep wrote:
begin Kurt Wall's quote:
| An unnamed Administration source, Net Llama!, wrote:
| % ANyone else not able to get to slashdot this evening (5PM PST)?
|
| 5x5 here...
there has been a serious shitstorm today, with intermittent outages on
various sites. lnm was defaced
begin Kurt Wall's quote:
| An unnamed Administration source, Net Llama!, wrote:
| % ANyone else not able to get to slashdot this evening (5PM PST)?
|
| 5x5 here...
there has been a serious shitstorm today, with intermittent outages on
various sites. lnm was defaced twice -- once while i was fix
On 03/25/03 19:14, Kurt Wall wrote:
An unnamed Administration source, Net Llama!, wrote:
% ANyone else not able to get to slashdot this evening (5PM PST)?
5x5 here...
ya, its working now. for a good chunk of the late afternoon it kept
timing out for me. *shrugs*
--
~
An unnamed Administration source, Net Llama!, wrote:
% ANyone else not able to get to slashdot this evening (5PM PST)?
5x5 here...
K
--
Crash programs fail because they are based on the theory that, with
nine women pregnant, you can get a baby a month.
-- Wernher von Braun
__
ANyone else not able to get to slashdot this evening (5PM PST)?
--
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com
5:30pm up 16 days,
Thanks to Bob Raymond we now have a Step on Migrating from 2.4.x to 2.5.x kernels.
You may find this step at http://www.linux-sxs.org/administration/25xconf.html
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sx
I'm running it on 2.4.19 and 20.
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 22:14:38 -0700
> Andrew Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Net Llama! wrote:
> Anyone care to comment on how difficult it is to install XFS on, say, a
> 2.4.13 kernel? Is it realistic to install it on a 2.4 seri
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, tom wrote:
> >> Is that enough, or should I go ahead and write an SxS?
> >
> >personally, i'd still like a real SxS, if you don't mind, and have the
> >time. thanks!
>
> I agree with Net Llama on this one...I haven't had the time to
> to really review all of the 2.5 kernel mat
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 09:27 pm, tom wrote:
> >> Is that enough, or should I go ahead and write an SxS?
> >
> >personally, i'd still like a real SxS, if you don't mind, and have the
> >time. thanks!
>
> I agree with Net Llama on this one...I haven't had the time to
> to really review all of the
Greets list...
Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
>> On Tuesday 25 March 2003 03:20 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
>> > On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
>> > > I've been using only 2.5.xx since mid-October. No data loss or anything
>> > > maj
Intersting read:
https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/phoebe-list/2003-March/004919.html
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
>From my httpd.conf,
# Dynamic Shared Object (DSO) Support
#load modules here
AddModule mod_php.c
AddModule mod_php3.c
AddModule mod_php4.c
# AddType: allows you to tweak mime.types without actually editing it, or to
# make certain files to be certain types.
#
# The following is for PHP4 (c
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 05:39 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
> > > > As of maybe around 2.5.6x, make dep is no longer needed, and the
> > > > instructions say to 'make bzImage' after you get done saving your
> > > > config. I tend to run 'make modules' anyway
Net Llama! wrote:
Now, Red Hat 8.0 already has 2.3.2 (-4.80) via up2date, which is a big
nuisance to the wine people (and me as a wine addict): wine simply won't
run under glib 2.3.x, and it seems to be quite a hassle to make it run
under the new glibc.
do you know why it won't run? i use wine
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
> Tim Wunder wrote:
>
> >
> > FWIW, Red Hat Linux 9 will have 2.3.1
>
> Now, Red Hat 8.0 already has 2.3.2 (-4.80) via up2date, which is a big
> nuisance to the wine people (and me as a wine addict): wine simply won't
> run under glib 2.3.x, and it se
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
> > > As of maybe around 2.5.6x, make dep is no longer needed, and the
> > > instructions say to 'make bzImage' after you get done saving your config.
> > > I tend to run 'make modules' anyway, and this builds most of the
> > > compiled in stuff anyway
Tim Wunder wrote:
FWIW, Red Hat Linux 9 will have 2.3.1
Now, Red Hat 8.0 already has 2.3.2 (-4.80) via up2date, which is a big
nuisance to the wine people (and me as a wine addict): wine simply won't
run under glib 2.3.x, and it seems to be quite a hassle to make it run
under the new glibc.
Kla
I was just perusing the Gentoo statistics page and found an interesting
number--
Average power per CPU: 1,070.4 MHz (lowest: 89.8 MHz, highest: 3,491.3 MHz;
median*: 996.7 MHz)
Gee, I didn't know anyone was running 3.5GHz machines! I may have to
upgrade that old Pentium 120MHz after all...
In
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 04:52 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 March 2003 03:20 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
> > > > I've been using only 2.5.xx since mid-October. No data loss or
> > > > anything
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 08:14, Chris Kassopulo wrote:
>
> Someone just answered this on alt.os.linux.slackware.
> Take a look at /etc/rc.d/rc.4.
>
> Chris
Yup, found thast going through the start-up scripts. Seems it first
looks for gdm if not then kdm by changing the order I now get kdm.:)
Net Llama! wrote:
> Last week there was a thread on the Linux kernel mailng list comparing
> XFS, reiserFS & ext3:
> http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/latest.html#13
>
> looks like ext3 came in last, resierFS first, XFS in the middle.
Could someone help me interpret these numbers?
*
On 3/25/2003 11:52 AM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
Is that enough, or should I go ahead and write an SxS?
personally, i'd still like a real SxS, if you don't mind, and have the
time. thanks!
Yes. There are others who feel the same :-)
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2003 03:20 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
> > > I've been using only 2.5.xx since mid-October. No data loss or anything
> > > major- finally have USB again after some issues with ACPI, APIC
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 03:20 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
> > I've been using only 2.5.xx since mid-October. No data loss or anything
> > major- finally have USB again after some issues with ACPI, APIC, and
> > VIA's odd implementation.
>
> I'll admit i'v
> Ted Ozolins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which config file determines whether kdm, gdm or xdm is
used? For some
> reason I've drawn a blank. Been at this installing and
updating way too
> long today
> Powered by Slackware 8.1
Someone just answered this on alt.os.linux.slackware.
Take
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Ted Ozolins wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 06:29, Net Llama! wrote:
>
> >
> > i realize that this doesn't solve your problem at all, but postgreSQL is
> > an order of magnitude easier to setup & admin than mysql, in my
> > experience. unless you really, really need mysql, i'd
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 06:29, Net Llama! wrote:
>
> i realize that this doesn't solve your problem at all, but postgreSQL is
> an order of magnitude easier to setup & admin than mysql, in my
> experience. unless you really, really need mysql, i'd suggest using
> postgreSQL (which is far more matu
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
> I've been using only 2.5.xx since mid-October. No data loss or anything
> major- finally have USB again after some issues with ACPI, APIC, and VIA's
> odd implementation.
I'll admit i've never played with 2.5.x. I've heard/read that it uses a
diffe
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
> On 3/25/2003 9:31 AM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
>
> >>Alternatively, use the 2.5.xx series. XFS support is built-in :D
> >
> >
> > yea, but then he's really playing with fire.
> >
>
> Althoug
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 02:31 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 March 2003 07:38 am, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> > > On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 22:14:38 -0700
> > >
> > > Andrew Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Net Llama! wrote:
> > > > > Las
On 3/25/2003 9:31 AM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
Alternatively, use the 2.5.xx series. XFS support is built-in :D
yea, but then he's really playing with fire.
Although, I recently read that the kernel developers are after more
"real
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2003 07:38 am, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 22:14:38 -0700
> >
> > Andrew Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Net Llama! wrote:
> > > > Last week there was a thread on the Linux kernel mailng list comparing
On Tue, 24 Mar 2003, Ted Ozolins wrote:
> Setting up permissions for user "ted" and "root" is where I keep getting
> things totally fragged. Untill I set perms I can create/delete databases
> no prob.But then more RTFM shed the light. I can start using
> mysql(sort-of)
>
> . One final hurdle. In se
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Andrew Mathews wrote:
> Net Llama! wrote:
> > Last week there was a thread on the Linux kernel mailng list comparing
> > XFS, reiserFS & ext3:
> > http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/latest.html#13
> >
> > looks like ext3 came in last, resierFS first, XFS in the middle.
> >
>
>
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 07:38 am, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 22:14:38 -0700
>
> Andrew Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Net Llama! wrote:
> > > Last week there was a thread on the Linux kernel mailng list comparing
> > > XFS, reiserFS & ext3:
> > > http://kt.zork.net/kern
44 matches
Mail list logo
