On 11/02/2002 09:14 AM, Leon A. Goldstein wrote:
This may have been discussed already: is there a performance advantage
using e.g. two swap partitions @ 128 MB vs. one 256 MB partition?
Looks like I will be replacing an ailing HD shortly.
This is one of those debates that really has less less
Randy Donohoe wrote:
I'm going to set up a notebook with a 6GB HD this weekend. Windows 2000
Server is getting 3GB and Red Hat 7.2 is getting 3GB. The Red Hat side
will be divided into /, home, swap, var, and temp. Swap will get 250MB.
How should I divide the remaining 2.5GB between /,
[ snips ]On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 07:53:33 -0700 BOF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Randy Donohoe wrote:
I'm going to set up a notebook with a 6GB HD this weekend. Windows
2000 Server is getting 3GB and Red Hat 7.2 is getting 3GB. The Red
Hat side will be divided into /, home, swap, var, and temp.
There were a lot of excellent recommendations (which I have snipped)
in this post, but the main thing is this. 3Gig is pretty mininmal
space for either Win2K or RH. You're going to run out of space
sooner rather than later. Get a bigger harddrive before you start,
or you will regret it.
Experimentation leads to experience.
I agree, nothing ventured, nothing gained.
Thanks,
Randy Donohoe
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the
