XFS filesystem revisited

2003-11-20 Thread Collins Richey
FYI. From time to time we have threads about the use of various filesystems (usually degrades rapidly to my fs is better than your fs). I just happened to be reviewing the current Gentoo Handbook - a work in progress, and I noted the following recommendation for XFS (a favorite of many on this

Re: XFS filesystem revisited

2003-11-20 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Collins Richey wrote: FYI. From time to time we have threads about the use of various filesystems (usually degrades rapidly to my fs is better than your fs). I just happened to be reviewing the current Gentoo Handbook - a work in progress, and I noted the following

Re: XFS filesystem revisited

2003-11-20 Thread Brett I. Holcomb
Collins, I get the feeling that the Gentoo people are not very interested in XFS and they don't want us using it - although this doc is better than the previous one in which they discourged us from using it. I think they should have the journaling warning on all the journalling systems or

Re: XFS filesystem revisited

2003-11-20 Thread Kurt Wall
Consuming 1.4K bytes, Collins Richey blathered: FYI. From time to time we have threads about the use of various filesystems (usually degrades rapidly to my fs is better than your fs). Well, my FS *is* better than your FS, but I digress. ;-) [Gentoo description of XFS shortcomings snipped]

Re: XFS filesystem revisited

2003-11-20 Thread Collins Richey
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:47:08 -0500 Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Collins, I get the feeling that the Gentoo people are not very interested in XFS and they don't want us using it - although this doc is better than the previous one in which they discourged us from using it. I

Re: XFS filesystem revisited

2003-11-20 Thread Brett I. Holcomb
Yes, Gentoo is conservative and that's good but at this point XFS has been in the field for a long time and has worked well. I personally feel the Gentoo people don't have a lot of experience with XFS so they just made some comments that are not all that factual (as Kurt Wall pointed out) -