On Nov 29 Net Llama was heard saying:
->> Waiting for reader process to fill input buffer ...
->> cdrecord: Input/output error. mode select g1: scsi sendcmd: no error
->> CDB: 55 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 3C 00
->> input buffer ready.
->> status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION)
->
->What version of cdrecord?
Keith Antoine wrote:
> The real problem is that I _Cannot_ remember the commands to type in as i do
> not use an editor enough to remember. I can read however and click the mouse
> button, also joe/jove have a commands reminder key sequence that I can callup
> to jog the memory.
>
> I had a probl
Pico (comes with PINE console mailer), has its limitations, but if you ahve
problems rembering vi commands, and arent worried about line length then you
should be ok...
However, there is something to a 'limit' on a single line for pico.. can not
remember what that was dealing with...
HTH,
On
Collins Richey wrote:
%
% Thanks, David
%
% That is now very clear; will remember forever. I presume this means,
% if you have the pristine base source, you only need the very latest
% -pren or -acn patch?
%
% One more question. When I apply (using one of several methods,
% depending on wheth
On Wednesday 28 November 2001 07:02 pm, burns wrote:
> On November 28, 2001 07:13 pm, Collins Richey wrote:
> > I may have an enforced vacation from email coming up. excite@home,
> > the ISP for my ATT cable connection, is in bankruptcy. ATT Broadband
> > is trying to buy them out to insure cont
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:36:32 -0500 "David A. Bandel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Collins Richey wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >
> > Re the 1.5.0 topic, I tried to patch 2.5.0 with the pre1 and pre2
> > patches. pre2 went on with no complaints.
> >
>
> Let me try one more time:
> normal patches from
On Friday 30 November 2001 10:27, Matthew Carpenter enunciated:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:49:46 +1000
>
> "Keith Antoine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I must also admit that to me vi is an editor that I thouroughly "hate",
> > it was as AFAIAC written by a certifiable geek, on a bad trip with dru
Matthew Carpenter wrote:
% On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:49:46 +1000
% "Keith Antoine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% > I must also admit that to me vi is an editor that I thouroughly "hate", it
% > was as AFAIAC written by a certifiable geek, on a bad trip with drugs. So I
% > would not have got far her
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:49:46 +1000
"Keith Antoine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must also admit that to me vi is an editor that I thouroughly "hate", it
> was as AFAIAC written by a certifiable geek, on a bad trip with drugs. So I
> would not have got far here, joe, jove are my limits.
>
VI
--- Zoran's mailinglist account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm, I continuously receive this error output from xcdroast which
> doesn't
> mean a lot to me.
>
> It's a Traxdata IDE burner, the mastering works without a hitch but
> it's when I try to write the CD that it stops with an error..
On Thursday 29 November 2001 16:54, you wrote:
> Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Here's a good question. I see a lot of postings about ways of
> > eliminating spam. How does one differentiate between spam and really
> > interesting new mail that doesn't happen to come from your know
Tim Wunder babbled on about:
> Previously, Douglas J Hunley chose to write:
> > Databases -> Installing and Using PostgreSQL (SiliconTao)
>
> Hmmm. Broken link?
my fault!
fixed
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: http://linux.nf Admin: http://hunley.homei
I downloaded Opera 6 a couple of days ago and found it to be more stable
than 5.0.1 but.
I had downloaded (for the first time I think) the dynamically linked QT
version.It was slug-slow at screen refreshes to the point of being almost
unusable.
I just downloaded the statically lin
Here's a copy of the e-mail that I got. Granted, it's from Insight instead
of ATT, but I suppose that all the providers are trying to keep broadband
access to their customers by using a court order if necessary.
http://www.insight-com.com/net/UPDATES/
I hope I don't lose connection. The bulk
Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Here's a good question. I see a lot of postings about ways of
> eliminating spam. How does one differentiate between spam and really
> interesting new mail that doesn't happen to come from your known and
> most frequent correspondents?
I don't persona
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 07:35:50AM -0500, Kurt Wall wrote:
...
>Register your domain name with a domain name registrar. Mail that
>can't be delivered to you right away gets queued for later delivery.
>When your upstream provider goes away, you point DNS at a new provider
>and, presto, your mail ge
Susan Macchia wrote:
% Just to clarify a point, any program can create new windows *without* spawning
% a new process. Spawning a process or thread is an implementation detail of an
% application that is independent of the user interface.
Yup. This point pokes at the event model vs. the thread m
Aw crap - I also use ATT broadband (formerly mediaone) up here in
Massachussetts. I haven't heard this rumour but this is going to be a real
problem for me as I need the modem for work (among other things). I'm going
to see what I can find out!
Collins Richey wrote:
> I may have an enforced va
KDE 2.x -> Installing KDE 2.x from source (me)
--
Douglas J. Hunley
Unix/Linux Admin
http://linux.nf
Down the wire, off the router,
through the firewall, nothing
but 'Net...
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailm
Collins Richey wrote:
[snip]
>
> Re the 1.5.0 topic, I tried to patch 2.5.0 with the pre1 and pre2
> patches. pre2 went on with no complaints. For pre2 I got several
> files with "Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume
> -R?. I hit eneter, then "Apply anyway" reply n. Is thi
On Wednesday 28 November 2001 23:52 pm, Jerry McBride wrote:
> I just tossed 2.4.16 onto my test server. I've never had this much fun in
> my OS/2 days!
Gess it doesn't take much to get you going :o)
(an old OS/2 camper)
--
+---
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 05:09:26 -0700 Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:45:11 -0500 "David A. Bandel"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:52:28 -0500
> > Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I just left kernel.org and noticed the
Greg Turpin wrote:
% On Wednesday 28 November 2001 8:41 pm, you wrote:
% > It is hard to believe that they wouldn't want to maintain service without
% > interruption. After all, we are already installed, and shell out $$ every
% > month for the service. We should be a cash cow for somebody.
% > T
I use register.com to maintain my domain. I have sendmail on my linux box.
@HOME has never tried to scan for mail servers on its network.
Joel
> On Wednesday 28 November 2001 8:41 pm, you wrote:
> > It is hard to believe that they wouldn't want to maintain service without
> > interruption. After
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 21:28:43 -0800 Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:41:47PM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote:
> >It is hard to believe that they wouldn't want to maintain service
> without
> >interruption. After all, we are already installed, and shell out $$
> every
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 05:03:16 -0700
Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, this is what I do. All of the groups I subscribe to have a
> filter to separate folder. The only thing that shows up in my inbox
> is either mail from my sister-in-law, my wife's relatives, or trash.
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:45:11 -0500
"David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
---snip---
> You sure are slow.
>
True enough... but very pleasurable I assure you. :')
Aside from that... I didn't notice any traffic that mentioned either 2.5.0 or
2.4.16...
I was just being curious.
--
*
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:45:11 -0500 "David A. Bandel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:52:28 -0500
> Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I just left kernel.org and noticed the new 2.5.0 beta kernel sounc
> was
> posted
> > for public consumption...
> >
> > Anyone el
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:29:44 -0500 Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 November 2001 23:13 pm, Collins Richey wrote:
> > All the spam I get is addressed to my email address. How would I
> get
> > mail that isn't addressed to me?
>
> Gee, why don't you whip up a few of th
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:52:28 -0500
Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just left kernel.org and noticed the new 2.5.0 beta kernel sounc was
posted
> for public consumption...
>
> Anyone else notice or working with it???
>
> I just tossed 2.4.16 onto my test server. I've never had this
On Wednesday 28 November 2001 19:52, Declan Moriarty enunciated:
I would like to thank those who answered my appeal, however it was not the
fault of Mandrake I am sorry to say. It was entirely my fault insofar as I
installed the video card with 3D accel near the end of the install. It was
done
On Wednesday 28 November 2001 12:32, you wrote:
> Declan Moriarty wrote:
> > I tried
> > mount /dev/hdb7 - bad superblock
> > e2fsck -p /dev/hdb7
> > It spits me back a notice saying "Try e2fsck -b 8193"
> > I tried for copies in 8K increments up to 49153, and 65537. Same result.
>
> Do you know w
32 matches
Mail list logo
