Matthew Carpenter wrote:
% Speaking of which, does anyone have a recommendation for a good WYSIWYG
HTML Editor?
There's a product called Quanta. Don't know anything about it, though.
Kurt
I'm pleased with it. Doug Hunley put me on to Quanta+ originally, it now
ships as standard with RH7.2
On Monday 10 December 2001 17:07, you wrote:
Matthew Carpenter wrote:
% Speaking of which, does anyone have a recommendation for a good WYSIWYG
HTML Editor?
Have you eliminated screem? Try that
--
Regards,
Declan Moriarty
Applied Researches - Ireland's Foremost
Susan Macchia wrote:
% Just to clarify a point, any program can create new windows *without* spawning
% a new process. Spawning a process or thread is an implementation detail of an
% application that is independent of the user interface.
Yup. This point pokes at the event model vs. the thread
I downloaded Opera 6 a couple of days ago and found it to be more stable
than 5.0.1 but.
I had downloaded (for the first time I think) the dynamically linked QT
version.It was slug-slow at screen refreshes to the point of being almost
unusable.
I just downloaded the statically
On Wednesday 28 November 2001 16:12, Kurt Wall enunciated:
Matthew Carpenter wrote:
% Speaking of which, does anyone have a recommendation for a good WYSIWYG
HTML Editor?
[long unwrapped line snipped]
There's a product called Quanta. Don't know anything about it, though.
Kurt
Bluefish
Quanta is pretty kewl... was turned on by it in when I was still running kde1
stcok for COL... now with kde2.1.1(yeah I know...) its even beter. very
nice easy to use interface once you learn where everything is at...
Have yet to try bluefish.. so can't give no opinions of it..
On Wednesday
Quoting Susan Macchia [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just tried it and find it has much improved performance over 5.0. Don't
care
so much about it being larger in size since I have 384mb. If you want a
fast
reliable browser, Opera is it (once you get past the MDI interface and
tailor
it to your
On Wednesday 28 November 2001 9:46 am, John Hiemenz wrote:
Multi-Document Interface.
When a program opens new windows as child windows of the parent, but keeps
them all contained within the parent window. (as opposed to spawning a new
process with a new window)
There is a setting which
MDI stands for Multiple Document Interface. It is a GUI policy that is used
by an application where it opens up windows within its own larger window. The
first time I saw it was on Windoze. Opera uses it, StarOffice uses it.
IMHO it can be a useful UI technique if used judiciously, but for
Quoting Susan Macchia [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MDI stands for Multiple Document Interface. It is a GUI policy
that is used by an application where it opens up windows within
its own larger window. The first time I saw it was on Windoze.
Opera uses it, StarOffice uses it.
Doh. Thanks. I've
Just to clarify a point, any program can create new windows *without* spawning
a new process. Spawning a process or thread is an implementation detail of an
application that is independent of the user interface.
John Hiemenz wrote:
On Wednesday 28 November 2001 07:47 am, you stated :
Quoting
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 01:38:28 + dallam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't have the cpu to run Mozilla or the patience to use
Netscape, so I like using opera.
I don't understand the cpu bit. I've only got 300MZ to play with.
Mozilla is oh-so-slow to startup, but OK after that. Now I'm
Hi Collins,
This old machine is a 100mhz, 1.2 hdd with 32mb's of ram. I don't
have the space for 30MB's of browser when 4MB's does all I need.
IIRC Mozilla is pretty large also and requires about 233mhz cpu
doesn't it? Due to cpu speed and disk space I tend to run only
small, fast applications on
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:13:06 + dallam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Collins,
This old machine is a 100mhz, 1.2 hdd with 32mb's of ram. I don't
have the space for 30MB's of browser when 4MB's does all I need.
IIRC Mozilla is pretty large also and requires about 233mhz cpu
doesn't it? Due
Previously, Collins Richey chose to write:
I liked in Opera. I don't really understand why Galeon (overlay on
top of the Mozilla Gecko engine) is so snappy whereas Mozilla is darn
slow.
A question that's been debated on the Mozilla newsgroups for what seems like
ages. AFAIK, Galeon doesn't
http://www.opera.com/linux/
--
Chris Kassopulo _/\_ Linux User #199893 _/\_ Vector Linux
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Interesting, they have .deb, .rpm, and tar.gz.
Waiting for the first review.. ;-)
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:00:51 +
Chris Kassopulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.opera.com/linux/
--
Chris Kassopulo _/\_ Linux User #199893 _/\_ Vector Linux
Hi ken,
I put it on early this morning. It seems to have grown about a MB or
so in size, but it has some neat built in features like
translations, dictionary and encyclopedia. It also has an irritating
popup disclainer when it first runs. All in all it is kind of nice
so far. I don't have the cpu
Does it do plugins?
Joel
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
I've been using Mozilla, and like it. I also use Opera 5, and am happy
with it as is. I wonder if I should chance the upgrade, in light of the
tech preview status of the current 6.0 release.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 01:38:28 +
dallam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi ken,
I put it on early this
Hi Joel,
Yes, it does. check out the opera website for all the features.
Thus spake Joel Hammer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Does it do plugins?
Joel
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Hi Ken,
Well, the only thing that I can say that I don't like about it is
the popup you get when you start it. Something about version not to
be distributed and so on. As to whether you should change or not,
that's a personal decision :) Can you save the old version and come
back to it if you
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 02:39:25 +
dallam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you save the old version and come
back to it if you don't like the new one?
Dallam
I think I can save it. Does the new one seem stable?
--
Ken Moffat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Ken,
Yes, it seems well tested and stable. No crashes, freezes or
anything like that. I have had in about 18 hours now without a hitch
but YMMV as you know :)
Thus spake Ken Moffat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I think I can save it. Does the new one seem stable?
--
Ken Moffat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oK, thanks for the feedback. Guess I'll give it a go.
(You sure have a lot of blank space at the bottom of your messages.)
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 03:00:43 +
dallam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken,
Yes, it seems well tested and stable. No crashes, freezes or
anything like that. I have had in
Speaking of which, does anyone have a recommendation for a good WYSIWYG HTML Editor?
Not just what NetScape and Mozilla have, I am looking for something I can use to do
things like FORMS, and it'd be a big plus to have something like DreamWeaver's
capability of using Layers to place content,
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 22:47:21 -0500
Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of which, does anyone have a recommendation for a good WYSIWYG
HTML Editor?
Not wysiwyg, but Bluefish is a good html editor.
--
Ken Moffat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Got it, installed on Libranet (deb). Seems excellent. Thanks again.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 03:00:43 +
dallam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken,
Yes, it seems well tested and stable. No crashes, freezes or
anything like that. I have had in about 18 hours now without a hitch
but YMMV as you know
Matthew Carpenter wrote:
% Speaking of which, does anyone have a recommendation for a good WYSIWYG HTML Editor?
[long unwrapped line snipped]
There's a product called Quanta. Don't know anything about it, though.
Kurt
--
History is curious stuff
You'd think by now we had enough
Yet
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 22:47:21 -0500
Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of which, does anyone have a recommendation for a good WYSIWYG HTML Editor?
Not just what NetScape and Mozilla have, I am looking for something I can use to do
things like FORMS, and it'd be a big plus to
30 matches
Mail list logo
