At 05:43 18/09/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Thanks for the replies.. but most of them seem to have an "ignorant"
>objective...
>
>Where are the type of projects taht would be working for medical research..
>looking for cures...
>
>I really don't care if there are aliens out there.. we have enuff aliens f
On Monday 17 September 2001 22:00, Andrew Mathews babbled:
> Bill Day wrote:
> > Im interested in allowing 'use' of my system during idle for these
> > companies that 'borrow' cpu cycles.
> >
> > would someone be kind enuff to post a few links to them so I may pick one
> > or two that I feel more
Thanks for the replies.. but most of them seem to have an "ignorant"
objective...
Where are the type of projects taht would be working for medical research..
looking for cures...
I really don't care if there are aliens out there.. we have enuff aliens from
the middle east in our country now,
what a shame... 225 only.
[root@server seti]# cat /home/seti/user_info.sah
type=user info
name=mwchang
nresults=225
total_cpu=8242798.854250
params_index=0
>>% > 2,199 units done the last time I looked.Over 5 years
>>worth.
>>% I...errr... my computer... just finished the first unit...
I hope some day I could understand the altorigthm they used to idniciate
a postive result. It's hard for me to believe in a computation which I
don't understand. I will keep doing it, anyway.
Ken Moffat wrote:
>What's to question. They scan the heavens, and we analyze the results.
>
>On Tue, 1
Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jerry McBride wrote:
> % On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:55:39 -0400 Bruce Marshall
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> %
> % ---snipi--
> %
> % > Piddly:o)
> % >
> % > 2,199 units done the last time I looked.Over 5 years
> worth.
> % >
> %
> % I
What's to question. They scan the heavens, and we analyze the results.
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:01:17 +0800
Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My system is still one SETI unit daily. But I really question this
program.
>
> >>Frankly, I question the value of this search program. And we could
stop
Bill Day wrote:
>
> Im interested in allowing 'use' of my system during idle for these companies
> that 'borrow' cpu cycles.
>
> would someone be kind enuff to post a few links to them so I may pick one or
> two that I feel more like helping...
>
> TIA,
>
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu
--
you can just search google.com for "SETI@home" and "distributed.net"
Don't just think about cpu cycles. Think coal and oil. Your computer
needs electricity.
Bill Day wrote:
>Im interested in allowing 'use' of my system during idle for these companies
>that 'borrow' cpu cycles.
>
>would someone
Im interested in allowing 'use' of my system during idle for these companies
that 'borrow' cpu cycles.
would someone be kind enuff to post a few links to them so I may pick one or
two that I feel more like helping...
TIA,
On Monday 17 September 2001 11:51, you wrote:
> Quoting Chang <[EMAIL
My system is still one SETI unit daily. But I really question this program.
>>Frankly, I question the value of this search program. And we could stop
>>this program from running without crashing a plane into WTC, right? :)
>>
>Not funny.
>
_
Quoting Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The WTC incidence may be a conspiraryc... maybe we shoudl contact the
> X-Files...
I feel quite safe in saying that I am not the only list member who finds
comments that make light of what happened to be totally unacceptable, in poor
taste and most likely
On Sunday 16 September 2001 09:10, Jerry McBride babbled:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:51:13 -0400 "Douglas J. Hunley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > why not distributed.net? or genome@home? or folding@home?
> > at least their clients are optimized to get the most out of your idle
> > time and n
Jerry McBride wrote:
% On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:55:39 -0400 Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
%
% ---snipi--
%
% > Piddly:o)
% >
% > 2,199 units done the last time I looked.Over 5 years worth.
% >
%
% I...errr... my computer... just finished the first unit... :.)
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:55:39 -0400 Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
---snipi--
> Piddly:o)
>
> 2,199 units done the last time I looked.Over 5 years worth.
>
I...errr... my computer... just finished the first unit... :.)
--
**
Bruce Marshall wrote:
> Piddly:o)
>
> 2,199 units done the last time I looked.Over 5 years worth.
>
> Sounds like we need to form a 'Caldera Refugees' SETI group.
>
> --
> ++
> + Bruce S. Marshall
On Sunday 16 September 2001 21:57 pm, Alan Jackson wrote:
> >
> > Well... I've joined the thousands of other folks and am now processing
> > data for the SETI project at Arecibo Radio Observatory.
> >
> > I highly encourage anyone with idle cpu cycles to join.
> >
> > By the way, the new Xseti
On September 17, 2001 03:40 am, Chang wrote:
> Frankly, I question the value of this search program. And we could stop
> this program from running without crashing a plane into WTC, right? :)
>
>
Not funny.
--
burns
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROT
Frankly, I question the value of this search program. And we could stop
this program from running without crashing a plane into WTC, right? :)
>
>I run it under Tkseti myself. Let's see, I'm on unit 331 on this box, over
>12,000 cpu hours worth.
>
___
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 08:37:18 -0400 Jerry McBride wrote:
>
> Well... I've joined the thousands of other folks and am now processing data for
> the SETI project at Arecibo Radio Observatory.
>
> I highly encourage anyone with idle cpu cycles to join.
>
> By the way, the new Xseti viewer is reall
On September 16, 2001 09:10 am, Jerry McBride wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:51:13 -0400 "Douglas J. Hunley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > why not distributed.net? or genome@home? or folding@home?
> > at least their clients are optimized to get the most out of your idle
> > time and not de
I always ran the job with cron. Don't care much about it as long as it
didn't die.
Ken Moffat wrote:
>I've been doing seti for quite a while. 281 data units completed. It's
>nice to have the graphic client for linux. something to check out is
>TKSeti, a nice graphic frontend.
>
___
I've been doing seti for quite a while. 281 data units completed. It's
nice to have the graphic client for linux. something to check out is
TKSeti, a nice graphic frontend.
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 08:37:18 -0400
Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well... I've joined the thousands of other
The WTC incidence may be a conspiraryc... maybe we shoudl contact the
X-Files...
Jerry McBride wrote:
>On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:51:13 -0400 "Douglas J. Hunley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>
>>why not distributed.net? or genome@home? or folding@home?
>>at least their clients are optimized to get
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:51:13 -0400 "Douglas J. Hunley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> why not distributed.net? or genome@home? or folding@home?
> at least their clients are optimized to get the most out of your idle time
> and not designed to on purpose to use a non-optimized algorithm... ;0
I'd
On Sunday 16 September 2001 08:37, Jerry McBride babbled:
> Well... I've joined the thousands of other folks and am now processing data
> for the SETI project at Arecibo Radio Observatory.
>
> I highly encourage anyone with idle cpu cycles to join.
>
> By the way, the new Xseti viewer is really ni
26 matches
Mail list logo
