On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 21:47:26 +0800
"Chang[linuxism]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> can your clients talk to seti headquarter?
?? well, their servers were down for a little while but they seem to be
back online again now.
HTH??
--
Myles Green Calgary AB Canada
Albe
"Chang[linuxism]" wrote:
>
> can your clients talk to seti headquarter?
>
> --
>From the Seti page at http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/
- January 24, 2002 -
The data server is currently overloaded. Many
users are unable to connect to send/receiv
"Chang[linuxism]" wrote:
>
> can your clients talk to seti headquarter?
>
Yep.
Results Received 3777
Total CPU Time 3.408 years
Average CPU Time per work unit 7 hr 54 min 13.9 sec
Last result returned:
can your clients talk to seti headquarter?
--
The pivotal point is the "second chance", judged by another set of force
and farce. In Linux We Trust -- http://linux.nf and
news://news.hkpcug.org
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.
At 05:43 18/09/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Thanks for the replies.. but most of them seem to have an "ignorant"
>objective...
>
>Where are the type of projects taht would be working for medical research..
>looking for cures...
>
>I really don't care if there are aliens out there.. we have enuff aliens f
On Monday 17 September 2001 22:00, Andrew Mathews babbled:
> Bill Day wrote:
> > Im interested in allowing 'use' of my system during idle for these
> > companies that 'borrow' cpu cycles.
> >
> > would someone be kind enuff to post a few links to them so I may pick one
> > or two that I feel more
our country now, terrorizing the hell out of us.
Anyway, before "I get on a soap box" about the middle east I'm of to work.
On Monday 17 September 2001 20:20, you wrote:
> you can just search google.com for "SETI@home" and "distributed.net"
> Don't j
what a shame... 225 only.
[root@server seti]# cat /home/seti/user_info.sah
type=user info
name=mwchang
nresults=225
total_cpu=8242798.854250
params_index=0
>>% > 2,199 units done the last time I looked.Over 5 years
>>worth.
>>% I...errr... my computer... just fi
results.
>
>On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:01:17 +0800
>Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>My system is still one SETI unit daily. But I really question this
>>
>program.
>
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get
Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jerry McBride wrote:
> % On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:55:39 -0400 Bruce Marshall
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> %
> % ---snipi--
> %
> % > Piddly:o)
> % >
> % > 2,199 units done the last time I looked.Over 5 years
> worth.
> % >
> %
> % I
What's to question. They scan the heavens, and we analyze the results.
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:01:17 +0800
Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My system is still one SETI unit daily. But I really question this
program.
>
> >>Frankly, I question the value of this search
Bill Day wrote:
>
> Im interested in allowing 'use' of my system during idle for these companies
> that 'borrow' cpu cycles.
>
> would someone be kind enuff to post a few links to them so I may pick one or
> two that I feel more like helping...
>
> TIA,
>
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu
--
you can just search google.com for "SETI@home" and "distributed.net"
Don't just think about cpu cycles. Think coal and oil. Your computer
needs electricity.
Bill Day wrote:
>Im interested in allowing 'use' of my system during idle for these companie
Im interested in allowing 'use' of my system during idle for these companies
that 'borrow' cpu cycles.
would someone be kind enuff to post a few links to them so I may pick one or
two that I feel more like helping...
TIA,
On Monday 17 September 2001 11:51, you wrote:
> Quoting Chang <[EMAIL
My system is still one SETI unit daily. But I really question this program.
>>Frankly, I question the value of this search program. And we could stop
>>this program from running without crashing a plane into WTC, right? :)
&
Quoting Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The WTC incidence may be a conspiraryc... maybe we shoudl contact the
> X-Files...
I feel quite safe in saying that I am not the only list member who finds
comments that make light of what happened to be totally unacceptable, in poor
taste and most likely
On Sunday 16 September 2001 09:10, Jerry McBride babbled:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:51:13 -0400 "Douglas J. Hunley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > why not distributed.net? or genome@home? or folding@home?
> > at least their clients are optimized to get the most out of your idle
> > time and n
Jerry McBride wrote:
% On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:55:39 -0400 Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
%
% ---snipi--
%
% > Piddly:o)
% >
% > 2,199 units done the last time I looked.Over 5 years worth.
% >
%
% I...errr... my computer... just finished the first unit... :.)
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:55:39 -0400 Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
---snipi--
> Piddly:o)
>
> 2,199 units done the last time I looked.Over 5 years worth.
>
I...errr... my computer... just finished the first unit... :.)
--
**
Bruce Marshall wrote:
> Piddly:o)
>
> 2,199 units done the last time I looked.Over 5 years worth.
>
> Sounds like we need to form a 'Caldera Refugees' SETI group.
>
> --
> +-
On Sunday 16 September 2001 21:57 pm, Alan Jackson wrote:
> >
> > Well... I've joined the thousands of other folks and am now processing
> > data for the SETI project at Arecibo Radio Observatory.
> >
> > I highly encourage anyone with idle cpu cycles to join.
On September 17, 2001 03:40 am, Chang wrote:
> Frankly, I question the value of this search program. And we could stop
> this program from running without crashing a plane into WTC, right? :)
>
>
Not funny.
--
burns
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROT
Frankly, I question the value of this search program. And we could stop
this program from running without crashing a plane into WTC, right? :)
>
>I run it under Tkseti myself. Let's see, I'm on unit 331 on this box, over
>12,000 cpu hours worth.
>
___
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 08:37:18 -0400 Jerry McBride wrote:
>
> Well... I've joined the thousands of other folks and am now processing data for
> the SETI project at Arecibo Radio Observatory.
>
> I highly encourage anyone with idle cpu cycles to join.
>
> By the wa
On September 16, 2001 09:10 am, Jerry McBride wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:51:13 -0400 "Douglas J. Hunley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > why not distributed.net? or genome@home? or folding@home?
> > at least their clients are optimized to get the most out of your idle
> > time and not de
I always ran the job with cron. Don't care much about it as long as it
didn't die.
Ken Moffat wrote:
>I've been doing seti for quite a while. 281 data units completed. It's
>nice to have the graphic client for linux. something to check out is
>TK
I've been doing seti for quite a while. 281 data units completed. It's
nice to have the graphic client for linux. something to check out is
TKSeti, a nice graphic frontend.
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 08:37:18 -0400
Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well... I'
The WTC incidence may be a conspiraryc... maybe we shoudl contact the
X-Files...
Jerry McBride wrote:
>On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:51:13 -0400 "Douglas J. Hunley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>
>>why not distributed.net? or genome@home? or folding@home?
>>at least their clients are optimized to get
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:51:13 -0400 "Douglas J. Hunley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> why not distributed.net? or genome@home? or folding@home?
> at least their clients are optimized to get the most out of your idle time
> and not designed to on purpose to use a non-optimized algorithm... ;0
I'd
On Sunday 16 September 2001 08:37, Jerry McBride babbled:
> Well... I've joined the thousands of other folks and am now processing data
> for the SETI project at Arecibo Radio Observatory.
>
> I highly encourage anyone with idle cpu cycles to join.
>
> By the way, the new
Well... I've joined the thousands of other folks and am now processing data for
the SETI project at Arecibo Radio Observatory.
I highly encourage anyone with idle cpu cycles to join.
By the way, the new Xseti viewer is really nic
31 matches
Mail list logo
