On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 02:37:20 -0600
Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 12:26:25AM -0600, Myles Green wrote:
[snippage]
in fact, it was one of their dial-up help-desk people who first
turned
me on to linux way back when - right after i said 'what do you mean
Shawn Tayler wrote:
command. Didn't save one for the zoo, so I'm looking for Sircam if it
shows up
I have a copy if you feel compelled to add to your zoo. Normal restrictions and
provisos apply, if you want me to send you a copy.
--
burns
Wow,
I have yet to receive a single copy, other than the ones emailed, thank
you gentlemen. I must hang out in the wrong crowd
stayler
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 17:23:40 -0600, Andrew Mathews wrote:
Ditto here. I'm on my fifth copy now.
--
Andrew Mathews
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 19:42:28 -0700 (PST)
Shawn Tayler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow,
I have yet to receive a single copy, other than the ones emailed,
thank
you gentlemen. I must hang out in the wrong crowd
same here I guess... either that or I've harped at my win32 using
friends
On Thursday 26 July 2001 01:11 am, Myles Green wrote:
| On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 19:42:28 -0700 (PST)
|
| Shawn Tayler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Wow,
|
| I have yet to receive a single copy, other than the ones emailed,
| thank
| you gentlemen. I must hang out in the wrong crowd
|
| same
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 01:17:43 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or you have a clue-enabled isp who knows his way around filters. i've
ok, that sounds more like it ;)
gotten scads of 'em on the earthlink account, but nothing on any of
the others. which is about what i would have expected
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 16:56, dep wrote:
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 12:30 am, burns wrote:
| I received the following gem in my mailbox. If anyone wants to see
ditto here.
fortunately? I was monitoring what dep said some days back, was it dep? who
mentioned mail asking for your help and
Got two of those here myself, addressed to my sourceforge account.
Luckily perhaps, pine doesn't even want to extract the attachment to save
it ;^) The return address was the same each time, but the attachment
differed:
2000-04.doc.com
2000-04.doc.lnk
Received: from mail.fm99.lt
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 06:12:54 -0700 (PST), Shawn Tayler wrote:
The subject line and attachment names are randomized, some what, by the
bug, before sending. Also the pley to address is probably not any
good, one or more characters are usually altered so the victim doesn't
Sorry guys. The Typos
Shawn Tayler wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 06:00:32 -0400 (EDT), Stew Benedict wrote:
Luckily perhaps, pine doesn't even want to extract the attachment to save
it ;^) The return address was the same each time, but the attachment
differed:
2000-04.doc.com
2000-04.doc.lnk
The subject
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 09:12 am, Shawn Tayler wrote:
| The subject line and attachment names are randomized, some what, by
| the bug, before sending. Also the pley to address is probably not
| any good, one or more characters are usually altered so the victim
| doesn't find out about the
I got the same mail.
The .pif file extension indicates that it is an executable file for the
windows system. Most of the currently spreading viruses belong to this
category. -- I believe that it is some kind of trojen.
:-)
Auyeung
- Original Message -
From: burns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
PcCillin filtered it out right away.
Auyeung
- Original Message - Seems McAfees AV software isn't real good
at catching the damned things while downloading. It only caught it
after the requisite 20 files, 21 with the original file, was attempted
to be accessed on the reboot, sets
The default install of OE has the preview function turned on. Attachments
with scripts extension ( visual basic, java, etc ) would be executed right
away if the message is displayed in the preview pane. That's why there are
so many victims.
- Original Message -
From: Stuart
For those who use OE. Go to IE andToolsInternet OptionsSecurityCustom
Level. Disable all scripting and you will be safe from BBV(billy based viri).
Oh yea, DONT open attachments.
Ronnie
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 21:09, you wrote:
The default install of OE has the preview function turned
I received the following gem in my mailbox. If anyone wants to see and dissect
the attachment, I will send it to them (offlist) under the explicit
understanding that:
a) It most certainly contains something nasty (for windows systems at
least); and
b) That they will properly quarantine and
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 12:30 am, burns wrote:
| I received the following gem in my mailbox. If anyone wants to see
| and dissect the attachment, I will send it to them (offlist) under
| the explicit understanding that:
it's the latest outlook express virus. about which i shall say more
on
17 matches
Mail list logo
