Hi Alex,
On to, 2014-09-11 at 12:25 +0200, Alexander Aring wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:12:09AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > I would also be grateful for any testing by bluetooth developers as I can't
> > physically test the code changes I have made
Hi Alex,
>> Passing the skb from 6lowpan up to the higher layers is not a
>> function of IPHC. By moving it out of IPHC we also remove the
>> need to support error code returns with NET_RX codes.
>> It also makes the lowpan_rcv function more extendable as we
>> can support more compression scheme
Hi Martin,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:12:09AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 11/09/14 10:53, Alexander Aring wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:33:33AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
> >> Hi Alex,
> >>
> >> On 11/09/14 10:01, Alexander Aring wrote:
> >>> Hi Martin,
> >>>
> >>>
Hi Alex,
On 11/09/14 10:53, Alexander Aring wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:33:33AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> On 11/09/14 10:01, Alexander Aring wrote:
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:25:56AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
Hi Alex,
On 11/09
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:33:33AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 11/09/14 10:01, Alexander Aring wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:25:56AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
> >> Hi Alex,
> >>
> >> On 11/09/14 09:18, Alexander Aring wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 10,
Hi Alex,
On 11/09/14 10:01, Alexander Aring wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:25:56AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> On 11/09/14 09:18, Alexander Aring wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:06:07PM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
Passing the skb from 6lowpan up
Hi Martin,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:25:56AM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 11/09/14 09:18, Alexander Aring wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:06:07PM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
> >> Passing the skb from 6lowpan up to the higher layers is not a
> >> function of IPHC. By m
Hi Alex,
On 11/09/14 09:18, Alexander Aring wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:06:07PM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
>> Passing the skb from 6lowpan up to the higher layers is not a
>> function of IPHC. By moving it out of IPHC we also remove the
>> need to support error code returns with NET_RX
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:06:07PM +0100, Martin Townsend wrote:
> Passing the skb from 6lowpan up to the higher layers is not a
> function of IPHC. By moving it out of IPHC we also remove the
> need to support error code returns with NET_RX codes.
> It also makes the lowpan_rcv function more exte
