[LinuxBIOS] is this motherboard supported? VIA EPIA-SP13000

2007-02-11 Thread Pablo Sosa
Hi there, Hope this is the right forum to ask. I was checking the list of supported motherboards in order to try linuxbios, I could find I can buy one of this motherboards which are similar but not the same to VIA that are mentioned on the page, i.e.

[LinuxBIOS] A (likely rather stupid) question on Via docs

2007-02-11 Thread Corey Osgood
Hi all, So, I'm working on the vt694x and getting rather frustrated, and so I popped open the docs from rom.by, and this caught my eye: | 1.0 | 9/8/99 | Final document release with “NDA Required” removed |DH| Does this mean that there shouldn't be any issue with using these docs? That would make

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r2550 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/util/flashrom

2007-02-11 Thread Uwe Hermann
Hi, On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 10:48:33PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: Speaking of the DCO, we are using the verbatim text of the DCO 1.1 but we have renamed it to LinuxBIOS Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1 on the wiki page. Good point. Was that intentional? Yes, but that was wrong. I

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r2550 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/util/flashrom

2007-02-11 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070211 16:19]: I posted an example a few days ago. I see a patch on the list, take it, modify it to improve _some_ parts of it, but it's still not finished and I'm still don't agree that it should be committed. But at least it's a bit better now. In such a

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r2550 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/util/flashrom

2007-02-11 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Well it would be really weird to sign-off on a patch that you don't agree with, so acked-by is quite redundant if you already signed off on a patch. I posted an example a few days ago. I see a patch on the list, take it, modify it to improve _some_ parts of it, but it's still not finished

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r2550 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/util/flashrom

2007-02-11 Thread Segher Boessenkool
I posted an example a few days ago. I see a patch on the list, take it, modify it to improve _some_ parts of it, but it's still not finished and I'm still don't agree that it should be committed. But at least it's a bit better now. In such a case I'd say I should sign-off (as I modified the

Re: [LinuxBIOS] is this motherboard supported? VIA EPIA-SP13000

2007-02-11 Thread Peter Stuge
Hi Pablo, On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 02:08:52AM -0800, Pablo Sosa wrote: Hope this is the right forum to ask. I was checking the list of supported motherboards in order to try linuxbios, I could find I can buy one of this motherboards which are similar but not the same to VIA that are mentioned

Re: [LinuxBIOS] A (likely rather stupid) question on Via docs

2007-02-11 Thread Corey Osgood
ron minnich wrote: On 2/11/07, Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, So, I'm working on the vt694x and getting rather frustrated, and so I popped open the docs from rom.by, and this caught my eye: | 1.0 | 9/8/99 | Final document release with NDA Required removed |DH| Does this mean