OK, I have a new booting problem. LB dies on the
i82801xx_enable_ioapic() function in 82801xx_lpc.c:
void i82801xx_enable_ioapic(struct device *dev)
{
uint32_t reg32;
volatile uint32_t *ioapic_index = (volatile uint32_t *)0xfec0;
volatile uint32_t *ioapic_data = (vol
Hi.
I have the same problem with iei/juki-511 and iei/lx-800.
This patch allow to load from slave.
--
Nikolay
diff -Nru filo-0.5/drivers/ide.c filo-0.5-slave/drivers/ide.c
--- filo-0.5/drivers/ide.c 2006-09-06 13:43:26.0 +0600
+++ filo-0.5-slave/drivers/ide.c 2007-09-17 15:18:20.0
Quoting Baski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:19:08PM -0700, Baski wrote:
>>> I want to place an option ROM image on a raw USB flash drive.
>>
>> Please explain why, otherwise we can't help you much.
>>
>>
>>> It will be an option ROM image of a proper controller with correct
On 9/28/07, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there any reason in hardware that hdb can NOT work if there is no hda?
Nope, it is only a problem with software.
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On 9/27/07, Tom Sylla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One easy solution is to just ground CSEL on the CF connector with a
> little rework. That will force it to be master.
>
is there any reason in hardware that hdb can NOT work if there is no hda?
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios
On 9/27/07, Corey Osgood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Weird, I've been booting off hdc for a while now with the jetway, only
> major difference against the current svn is Peter's speedup patch. It
> boots either with or without hda connected. Perhaps something in that
> patch fixed it? I haven't t
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] Dummy pci dev for image on a usb flash drive
(Peter Stuge)
To: linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes";
format="flowed"
Quoting Baski :
>
>
> --
ron minnich wrote:
> Why they did not just put the CF slot on secondary is anyone's guess ...
My guess is that it is because there is no secondary IDE on 5536. :)
There isn't anything built into 5536 to make the drive 0/drive 1 swap easy.
One easy solution is to just ground CSEL on the CF connec
ron minnich wrote:
> anyone tried this? I can't get anywhere with a board with only hdb. I
> did some hacking in the filo ide driver but I am sure I got it wrong.
> Any ideas here?
>
> thanks
>
> ron
Weird, I've been booting off hdc for a while now with the jetway, only
major difference against th
> On 9/27/07, Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does hdb only mean slave and no master on IDE-0 ?
> >
> > Why not just make it the master?
>
> The msm800sev has an IDE with hda and a CF slot which is hdb. I would
> like to run CF only. I just don't know how to do it (yet). I wonder if
>
On 9/27/07, Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does hdb only mean slave and no master on IDE-0 ?
>
> Why not just make it the master?
The msm800sev has an IDE with hda and a CF slot which is hdb. I would
like to run CF only. I just don't know how to do it (yet). I wonder if
there is some tr
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 05:14:58PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> > anyone tried this? I can't get anywhere with a board with only hdb. I
> > did some hacking in the filo ide driver but I am sure I got it wrong.
> > Any ideas here?
>
> I've only ever been able to make filo work with 'hda' - the fi
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 05:14:58PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> anyone tried this? I can't get anywhere with a board with only hdb. I
> did some hacking in the filo ide driver but I am sure I got it wrong.
> Any ideas here?
I've only ever been able to make filo work with 'hda' - the first drive on
Does hdb only mean slave and no master on IDE-0 ?
Why not just make it the master?
Myles
> anyone tried this? I can't get anywhere with a board with only hdb. I
> did some hacking in the filo ide driver but I am sure I got it wrong.
> Any ideas here?
>
> thanks
>
> ron
>
--
linuxbios mail
anyone tried this? I can't get anywhere with a board with only hdb. I
did some hacking in the filo ide driver but I am sure I got it wrong.
Any ideas here?
thanks
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On 9/27/07, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - include: someone might break board A in a commit that was only tested
> on board B.
I can only say it's been a huge problem in the past. I've had cases
where I tried to rebuild linuxbios for an older board, only to find
that "improvem
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 07:14:08PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> [Sorry for being late, I'm a bit, um... Internet-challenged at the moment.
> No PGP signature for the same reason.]
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:50:52AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:53:21PM -0700, ron m
* Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070927 19:14]:
> No duplicated code whatsoever. Sure, this may not be too elegant
> (there's some room for improvements, though), but it's definately a
> _lot_ better than duplicating all those files.
Another question: If that code needs to be duplicated for eac
OK, I like signed offset, but let's let stefan weigh in. It's critical
that we get this right.
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
[Sorry for being late, I'm a bit, um... Internet-challenged at the moment.
No PGP signature for the same reason.]
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:50:52AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:53:21PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> > Robert, I understand the reason for the include of th
On 27.09.2007 18:45, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> On 9/27/07, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 27.09.2007 18:21, Robinson Tryon wrote:
>>> On 9/23/07, Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To make the tool more useful we need
- As many supported Super I/Os as poss
On 9/27/07, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27.09.2007 18:21, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> > On 9/23/07, Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> To make the tool more useful we need
> >>
> >> - As many supported Super I/Os as possible.
> >>
> >>Supporting new ones is rela
On 27.09.2007 18:21, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> On 9/23/07, Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> To make the tool more useful we need
>>
>> - As many supported Super I/Os as possible.
>>
>>Supporting new ones is relatively easy, but a bit time-consuming.
>>You have to grab the datasheet,
On 9/23/07, Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To make the tool more useful we need
>
> - As many supported Super I/Os as possible.
>
>Supporting new ones is relatively easy, but a bit time-consuming.
>You have to grab the datasheet, find out the ID/version of the
>Super I/O and
On 27.09.2007 17:53, Peter Stuge wrote:
> So, I should have reviewed sooner.
Thanks for reviewing now. I will take your comments into account for the
ongoing rewrite/restructuring.
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:29:57PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> +/* Generic Super I/O helper functions */
>>
On 26.09.2007 18:11, ron minnich wrote:
> On 9/26/07, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK, this patch is not for the weak of hart because it touches some logic
>> we had lots of problems with in the past.
>> Basically, the lar archive header walk will not see a header at the end
So, I should have reviewed sooner.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:29:57PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +/* Generic Super I/O helper functions */
> +uint8_t regval(uint16_t port, uint8_t reg)
> +{
> + outb(reg, port);
> + return inb(port + 1);
> +}
> +
> +void regwrite(uint16_t port, uint
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:20:28PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> I just wrote a small utility to set the appropiate bytes in
> linuxbios.rom.
>
> Any comments?
I prefer the xxd trick. Note that I am exclusively working on systems
where (I can make sure) xxd is available.
//Peter
--
linuxbios
Quoting Baski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:04:22 +0200
> From: Peter Stuge
>
> Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] Dummy pci dev for image on a usb flash drive
> To: linuxbios@linuxbios.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Typ
Dear LinuxBIOS readers!
This is the automated build check service of LinuxBIOS.
The developer "ward" checked in revision 2811 to
the LinuxBIOS source repository and caused the following
changes:
Change Log:
Add preliminary SPI flash identification support for SPI chips attached
to ITE IT8716F
Hi,
Laith Juwaidah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found your website by accident, I was looking for a way to flash the ROM of
> my Samsung I600 so I can install Linux on it (It's a project I want to do)...
>
> I am a programmer but I'm completely new to this...
>
> That's why I was wondering if I can use
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 11:31:14AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> No problem. Can you commit with your changes? Changelog follows:
>
> Add preliminary SPI flash identification support for SPI chips attached
> to ITE IT8716F Super I/O. Right now this is hardcoded to the Gigabyte
> M57SLI bo
Author: ward
Date: 2007-09-27 16:29:57 +0200 (Thu, 27 Sep 2007)
New Revision: 2811
Modified:
trunk/util/flashrom/board_enable.c
Log:
Add preliminary SPI flash identification support for SPI chips attached
to ITE IT8716F Super I/O. Right now this is hardcoded to the Gigabyte
M57SLI board. It wo
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:07:45PM -0400, Ward Vandewege wrote:
>
> I would like a way to change the MAC address for a rom image with some tool -
> ideally as an option to flashrom, I guess. Keep in mind that there can be
> multiple addresses on a board!
I just wrote a small utility to set the ap
--
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:04:22 +0200
From: Peter Stuge
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] Dummy pci dev for image on a usb flash drive
To: linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 a
On 26.09.2007 00:25, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 09:00:57PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>> You patch in the other mail looked fine. Fix the issues mentioned above
>> as "FIX" and post another probe_superio from a lb boot after fixes.
>
> This is getting weird. I just a
On 26.09.2007 23:07, Ward Vandewege wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:02:33PM -0400, Tom Sylla wrote:
>> On 9/26/07, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> unsigned long mac_pos;
>>> mac_pos = 0xffd0; // refer to romstrap.inc and
>>> romstrap.lds
>>>
Hi,
I found your website by accident, I was looking for a way to flash the ROM of
my Samsung I600 so I can install Linux on it (It's a project I want to do)...
I am a programmer but I'm completely new to this...
That's why I was wondering if I can use flashrom to flash the ROM of my
Samsung...
On 27.09.2007 02:38, Ward Vandewege wrote:
> Hi Carl-Daniel,
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:00:55AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>> Updated patch attached. This one was unfortunately an old version of the
>> code.
>
> This certainly does something!
>
> # ./flashrom --mainboard gigabyte
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:55:17AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > How about AMD ?
> >
> > AMD has been a huge contributor to linuxbios for several years
> > now. I don't know where we would be without them.
>
> And in the future?..
I see no reason for things to change. On the contrary I th
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:19:08PM -0700, Baski wrote:
> I want to place an option ROM image on a raw USB flash drive.
Please explain why, otherwise we can't help you much.
> It will be an option ROM image of a proper controller with correct
> option ROM and PNP headers. How can we make linuxBio
41 matches
Mail list logo
