On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:56:20PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Please provide a diff between dmesg under LB and proprietary BIOS. I
suspect some keyboard init is done differently.
Here.
--
Robert Millan
GPLv2 I know my rights; I want my phone call!
DRM What use is a phone call, if
On 28.09.2007 21:14, Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:56:20PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Please provide a diff between dmesg under LB and proprietary BIOS. I
suspect some keyboard init is done differently.
Here.
There's quite some stuff broken. Comments below.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:41:00PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
/proc/interrups /proc/ioports /proc/iomem
would also be useful to compare.
Here.
--
Robert Millan
GPLv2 I know my rights; I want my phone call!
DRM What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 09:00:57PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
You patch in the other mail looked fine. Fix the issues mentioned above
as FIX and post another probe_superio from a lb boot after fixes.
This is getting weird. I just added all the fixes, and got my superio layout
to be
On 31.08.2007 19:38, Robert Millan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 06:35:23PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
SuperI/O found at 0x2e: id=0x8712, chipver=0x7
ITE IT8712
switching to LDN 0x4
idx 30 60 61 62 63 70 f0 f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6
val 01 02 90 00 00 00 80 00 0a 00 80 00 ff
def 00 02 90
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 06:35:23PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
SuperI/O found at 0x2e: id=0x8712, chipver=0x7
ITE IT8712
switching to LDN 0x4
idx 30 60 61 62 63 70 f0 f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6
val 01 02 90 00 00 00 80 00 0a 00 80 00 ff
def 00 02 90 02 30 09 00 00 00 00 00 NA NA
ldn
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 07:38:25PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Attaching a diff of my
changes.
Really attaching it now ;-)
--
Robert Millan
GPLv2 I know my rights; I want my phone call!
DRM What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Index:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 06:31:40PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
What sort of problems did the board with the IT8712F have?
- PS/2 keyboard doesn't work (neither in FILO or Linux).
- USB keyboard works on Linux but not on FILO.
- PCI (not PCI-e/AGP/whatever) VGA works fine, but if
On 29.08.2007 13:30, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 06:31:40PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
What sort of problems did the board with the IT8712F have?
- PS/2 keyboard doesn't work (neither in FILO or Linux).
- USB keyboard works on Linux but not on FILO.
- PCI
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 01:41:54PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
This patch makes ITE SuperI/O probing/dumping a little bit more generic,
fixes minor codingstyle issues and prepares the table for supporting
more chips of the ITE IT87xx SuperI/O family.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel
On 27.08.2007 22:08, Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 01:41:54PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
This patch makes ITE SuperI/O probing/dumping a little bit more generic,
fixes minor codingstyle issues and prepares the table for supporting
more chips of the ITE IT87xx SuperI/O
This patch makes ITE SuperI/O probing/dumping a little bit more generic,
fixes minor codingstyle issues and prepares the table for supporting
more chips of the ITE IT87xx SuperI/O family.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- LinuxBIOSv2/util/probe_superio/probe_superio.c
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 01:41:54PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
This patch makes ITE SuperI/O probing/dumping a little bit more generic,
fixes minor codingstyle issues and prepares the table for supporting
more chips of the ITE IT87xx SuperI/O family.
Tested on my two ITE-powered
13 matches
Mail list logo
