Hello,
I noticed a compilation warning of RTC for powerpc. Found the fix existing
for MIPS & not for available for PowerPC.
--
"The Good You Do, The Best You GET"
Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**
From 8435e5876fc3d629406c63b85bff82c25fc4bf75 Mon Sep 17 00:0
>From 8435e5876fc3d629406c63b85bff82c25fc4bf75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Srikanth Krishnakar
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:07:06 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] RTC: rtc-cmos.c: Fix warning on PowerPC
The following warning is seen while compilation of PowerPC kernel:
CC drivers/rtc/rtc-cmo
.
.
--
Is anything else need to be implemented for ppc44x for KGDB to work ?
--
"The Good You Do, The Best You GET"
Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.o
.
.
--
Is anything else need to be implemented for ppc44x for KGDB to work ?
--
"The Good You Do, The Best You GET"
Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.o
Hi all,
The latest RT patch "patch-2.6.29-rc6-rt3" is throwing following compilation
errors for POWERPC linux kernel 2.6.29-rc6 :-
As I used plain vanilla kernel i.e -> Linux-2.6.28 + patch-2.6.29-rc6 +
patch-2.6.29-rc6-rt3
While compiling for ppc440...
[r...@srikanth linux-2.6.29-rc6]# make
Hi all,
Just managed to compile PREEMPT_RT on Linux-2.6.29-rc7 PowerPC, I used
following patches from broken package of RT
(Patch-2.6.26.8-rt16-broken-out.tar.gz) , Need to investigate further with
respect to HRT,
patches/patch-2.6.29-rc7
patches/patch-2.6.29-rc7-rt1.patch
patches/percpu-locked
nybody correct me, where I am going wrong. I am not able to hit KGDB
breakpoint. ?
--
Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
going wrong. I am not able to hit KGDB
breakpoint. ?
--
Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Hi,
The simple" config is deprecated , when the MMIO support was added
to the KGDB 8250 driver. I have to use the syntax:
kgdb8250=,,,
Thanks
Srikanth
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 8:40 PM, srikanth krishnakar
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using KGDB on powerpc-440. This is tested on
PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:13 AM, srikanth krishnakar
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I need help in kgdboc testing on PowerPC target.
>
> Have you tried contacting the maintainer ? (I noticed that Jason
> wasn&#x
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Jason Wessel wrote:
> srikanth krishnakar wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Target : PowerPC, Virtex-440 Generic
> > Serial port : Xilinx 16550 Uart ( depends on OF_PLATFORM)
> >
> > Further investigation of KGDBOC on PowerPC shows
Hi,
kernel- 2.6.29
Debug technique: KGDB
The PowerPC kernel does not initialize the PPC440 DBCR0 register. This
prevents the use of software breakpoints in case of internal debug
mode. Looking into head_fsl_booke.S for initialization of DBCR0 is
used by boot-loaders.
It seems head_44x.S lacks thi
rther target hangs while running gdbserver !
Thanks,
Srikanth
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:23 AM, David Gibson
wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 06:38:53PM +0530, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> kernel- 2.6.29
>> Debug technique: KGDB
>>
>> The PowerPC
Hi David,
Just to correct the statements : How the DBCR0 is initialized on
targets that don't use boot loaders ?
-Srikant
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:30 AM, David Gibson
wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:20:46AM +0530, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>>
Hi John,
I am not finding any conclusion of the plan to add DBCR0
initialization code to head_44x.S after this discussion :
http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-DBCR0-initialization-for-440-td23049044.html#a23049044
Can you please comment ?
Thanks,
-Srikanth Krishnakar
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at
anth
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:20 AM, srikanth krishnakar
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I am not sure how the IDM behaves on few of PPC440 targets which don't
> have boot loaders. I have a reference for your question:
>
> http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-DBCR0-initializat
___
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
--
"The Good You Do, The Best You GET"
Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
---
> Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up
> now. <https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969>
>
> ___
> Linuxppc-dev mail
's is 0. Which patch in netpoll* or any net device has caused this
issue.
One more thing to notice in x86 or PowerPC the kernel dies exactly after
reply of four threads/packets.
Thanks,
Srikanth Krishnakar
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxp
Hi all,
Kernel : Linux-2.6.29
Arch: Powerpc (ppc44x)
Target: Xilinx ML507 Virtex5
I have an issue in "Reset System" of Xilinx ML507 target board. I am using
Compact Flash to boot the target ( using system ACE file to boot the
target), during the process reset or reboot command on the target, I am
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:16 AM, srikanth
> krishnakar wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Kernel : Linux-2.6.29
> > Arch: Powerpc (ppc44x)
> > Target: Xilinx ML507 Virtex5
> >
> > I have an issue in &
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:39 AM, srikanth
> krishnakar wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Grant Likely >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:1
led; errno=2: No such file or directory
msgctl101 FAIL : in read # = 54260,key =
d46d
msgctl101 B[ cut here ]
Any clue ?
Thanks in Advance !
--
Srikanth Krishnakar
**
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing l
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line 904.
>
> On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:33 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>
> The LTP test case msgctl10.c fails on linux-2.6.29.6 for PowerPC
>> architecture (ppc440)
>>
>>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:38 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kumar Gala
>> wrote:
>> I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line 904.
>>
>>
>
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:32 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Kumar Gala
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:38 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>>
>
/0x338
[ce837f20] [c00065b4] sys_clone+0x58/0x88
[ce837f40] [c000e164] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x3c
r...@inson:~#
Any Clue or any bugs found in mm/slab.c for linux-2.6.29.6 while
running IPSEC applications ?
Thanks in Advance !
Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**
__
Yes,
You are right. CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled in the kernel config.
Attached is the config.
Thanks
-Srikanth
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:46:26PM +0530, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Here is kernel bug f
gt; 7c001828 3000 7c00192d
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
Rebooting in 180 seconds..
Attachment: kernel config
your early comments are appreciated !
Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
# Linu
g: Fatal exception in interrupt
Rebooting in 180 seconds..
Any suggestions or the filed bug report anywhere ??
-Srikant
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:05 PM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Target : PowerPC (ppc440)
>
> While testing kernel linux-2.6.29.6 with IPSEC enabled I o
unsubscribe me plz.
--
"The Good You Do, The Best You GET"
Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
31 matches
Mail list logo
