On 10/17/07, Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote:
> >> + memory {
> >> + device_type = "memory";
> >> + reg = < 0400>; // 64MB
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> >
> > I think we're moving to the
Grant Likely wrote:
>> + memory {
>> + device_type = "memory";
>> + reg = < 0400>; // 64MB
>> + };
>> +
>> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>
> I think we're moving to the convetion of naming these nodes
> "soc@" now. (You can drop the 5200 for
On Oct 8, 2007, at 1:27 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 10/7/07, Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +
>> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> + #address-cells = <3>;
On 10/7/07, Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +
> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + #address-cells = <3>;
> + device_type = "pci";
> +
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > +/ {
> > + model = "fsl,tqm5200";
>
> "fsl," is not appropriate as the TQM5200 is not a freescale product.
> We need a new abbreviation for tq-components.
How about
model = "tqc,tqm5200";
?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Soft
On 10/7/07, Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Add device tree source file for TQM5200 board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Bernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> tqm5200.dts | 21
Add device tree source file for TQM5200 board.
Signed-off-by: Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Bernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Martin Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
tqm5200.dts | 217
1 file c
