On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 02:58 +, Gary E. Miller wrote:
Yo Richard!
On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 20:09:38 +0200
Richard Cochran richardcoch...@gmail.com wrote:
The configuration file scheme can't do what you want it to do, even
without the ntpshm_segment option.
Yeah, sadly...
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 02:58:34AM +, Gary E. Miller wrote:
is the same as entering
ptp4l -i eno1 -i eno2
Sadly, no. When you do that ptp4l only uses one SHM, not two. Now
if ptp4l read the [eno1] and [eno2] sections it would work.
There is one ptp4l instance (and
Signed-off-by: Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com
---
config.c| 12
config.h| 2 ++
default.cfg | 2 ++
ptp4l.8 | 10 ++
ptp4l.c | 3 +++
udp.c | 7 +++
udp.h | 5 +
udp6.c | 6 ++
udp6.h | 5 +
9 files changed,
Yo Miroslav!
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 11:47:43 +0200
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 02:58:34AM +, Gary E. Miller wrote:
is the same as entering
ptp4l -i eno1 -i eno2
Sadly, no. When you do that ptp4l only uses one SHM, not two. Now
if
I have no problem with adding these options.
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:49:43PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
+unsigned char udp_ttl = 1;
...
+ if (setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_IP, IP_MULTICAST_TTL, udp_ttl,
+sizeof(udp_ttl))) {
+ pr_err(setsockopt
On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 22:02 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
I have no problem with adding these options.
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:49:43PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
+unsigned char udp_ttl = 1;
...
+ if (setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_IP, IP_MULTICAST_TTL, udp_ttl,
+
