Re: [Linuxptp-users] IEEE802.1AS gPTP Boundary Clock

2023-02-07 Thread Richard Cochran
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 03:59:23PM +, Nemo Crypto wrote: > >As a practical matter, I don't see why you can't simply use linuxptp's > >BC mode, configuring the two ports with 802.1as settings. > > >Who could tell the difference? > Would the linuxptp's BC send all the TLVs required for

Re: [Linuxptp-users] IEEE802.1AS gPTP Boundary Clock

2023-02-07 Thread Nemo Crypto
>As a practical matter, I don't see why you can't simply use linuxptp's >BC mode, configuring the two ports with 802.1as settings. >Who could tell the difference? Would the linuxptp's BC send all the TLVs required for 802.1AS? I mean, the Time Follower that receives Sync/Followup from

Re: [Linuxptp-users] IEEE802.1AS gPTP Boundary Clock

2023-02-07 Thread Richard Cochran
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:49:42PM +, Nemo Crypto wrote: > Then the actual question becomes, whether linuxptp has support for > IEEE802.1AS Time Aware Bridge (Time Relay)? No, TAB/Time Relay is not supported. There was some initial work done (check the archives), but that was never

Re: [Linuxptp-users] IEEE802.1AS gPTP Boundary Clock

2023-02-07 Thread Nemo Crypto
Thanks Miroslav! Then the actual question becomes, whether linuxptp has support for IEEE802.1AS Time Aware Bridge (Time Relay)? Can any other expert comment please? On Tuesday, 7 February, 2023 at 03:29:48 am GMT-5, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 04:17:30PM +,

Re: [Linuxptp-users] IEEE802.1AS gPTP Boundary Clock

2023-02-07 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 04:17:30PM +, Nemo Crypto wrote: > Hi Miroslav, > Thanks! > In my understanding of "Time Aware Bridge", it doesn't correct/adjust/tune > the PHC. Is that not correct? Looking at some freely available drafts of 801.AS, yes, it seems the clocks are supposed to be