On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 03:59:23PM +, Nemo Crypto wrote:
> >As a practical matter, I don't see why you can't simply use linuxptp's
> >BC mode, configuring the two ports with 802.1as settings.
>
> >Who could tell the difference?
> Would the linuxptp's BC send all the TLVs required for
>As a practical matter, I don't see why you can't simply use linuxptp's
>BC mode, configuring the two ports with 802.1as settings.
>Who could tell the difference?
Would the linuxptp's BC send all the TLVs required for 802.1AS? I mean, the
Time Follower that receives Sync/Followup from
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:49:42PM +, Nemo Crypto wrote:
> Then the actual question becomes, whether linuxptp has support for
> IEEE802.1AS Time Aware Bridge (Time Relay)?
No, TAB/Time Relay is not supported. There was some initial work done
(check the archives), but that was never
Thanks Miroslav!
Then the actual question becomes, whether linuxptp has support for IEEE802.1AS
Time Aware Bridge (Time Relay)?
Can any other expert comment please?
On Tuesday, 7 February, 2023 at 03:29:48 am GMT-5, Miroslav Lichvar
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 04:17:30PM +,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 04:17:30PM +, Nemo Crypto wrote:
> Hi Miroslav,
> Thanks!
> In my understanding of "Time Aware Bridge", it doesn't correct/adjust/tune
> the PHC. Is that not correct?
Looking at some freely available drafts of 801.AS, yes, it seems the
clocks are supposed to be
