>As a practical matter, I don't see why you can't simply use linuxptp's
>BC mode, configuring the two ports with 802.1as settings.
>Who could tell the difference?
Would the linuxptp's BC send all the TLVs required for 802.1AS? I mean, the
Time Follower that receives Sync/Followup from linuxptp's BC should never see
any difference in the frames when compared to the frames it would receive if it
is a 802.1AS Time Leader End Point. Please advise.
Thanks,Nemo
On Tuesday, 7 February, 2023 at 10:53:11 am GMT-5, Richard Cochran
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:49:42PM +0000, Nemo Crypto wrote:
> Then the actual question becomes, whether linuxptp has support for
> IEEE802.1AS Time Aware Bridge (Time Relay)?
No, TAB/Time Relay is not supported. There was some initial work done
(check the archives), but that was never finished.
As a practical matter, I don't see why you can't simply use linuxptp's
BC mode, configuring the two ports with 802.1as settings.
Who could tell the difference?
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
