[Liquibase-user] Res: Keeping the order of execution on local databases

2009-04-20 Thread Diego Moreira da Rosa
> Developer A should have merged from the SCM, then done a complete > re-test, including rebuilding the database. At least, that's how I see it. Yep, that is another solution I'd forgotten, but it is also one I was trying to avoid. In general, I would not recommend rebuilding the database bec

Re: [Liquibase-user] Res: Keeping the order of execution on local databases

2009-04-20 Thread David C. Hicks
I would agree that testing the migration should be a part of the development process, but I think of it as a level of testing that comes after my software. First and foremost, the software has to work with the version of the database that it is designed to run against. I do understand that wi

Re: [Liquibase-user] Res: Keeping the order of execution on local databases

2009-04-21 Thread Thomas Vial
Hi, > - When you constantly rebuild your database, you are not testing data > migration, which is one of the main advantages of using a tool such as > Liquibase. > - It forces all the developers and testers to loose their test data. When > test data has been inserted during the development or te