Re: [IFWP] RE:

Richard and all, Now Richard, that wasn't very nice... (Sarcasm intended) >;) But of course, you may have a point there! >;) Richard J. Sexton wrote: > At 07:41 PM 8/21/99 -0700, you wrote: > >Becasue Mr. Roberts has the communicativeness of the average clam. > > As any armchair biologist

Re: [IFWP] Re: Opposition to extension of terms of interim ICANN board

Kerry and all, Pave the way to stable transition!!!??? That is a laugh, as the history thus far plainly shows... Kerry Miller wrote: > Ellen, > > Since the link to the archive of comments on the "Proposed Resolution > > Concerning Term of Initial At Large Directors" at > >

Re: [IFWP] RE:

At 07:41 PM 8/21/99 -0700, you wrote: >Becasue Mr. Roberts has the communicativeness of the average clam. As any armchair biologist or aquarist knows - this is insulting to the clams. -- This program posts news to thousands of machines throughout the entire civilized world. Your message will c

Re: [IFWP] Re: Opposition to extension of terms of interim ICANNboard

> >Where's the proposed resolution itself? - proposed resolutions concerning the terms of the Initial Directors Ellen Rony

[IFWP] Re: Opposition to extension of terms of interim ICANN board

Ellen, > Since the link to the archive of comments on the "Proposed Resolution > Concerning Term of Initial At Large Directors" at > .html> does not currently work Where's the proposed resolution itself? How is it supp

[IFWP] RE:

Becasue Mr. Roberts has the communicativeness of the average clam. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Planet Communications Computing Facility > Sent: Saturday, August 21, 1999 5:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sr. Francis Fanego > Cc

[IFWP] Re: your mail

On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Planet Communications Computing Facility wrote: > Hello: > > With respect to esther dyson - chairman of the icann board. I've noticed > that few people address their concerns to the pres mike roberts, instead > all concerns are directed to the chairman esther dyson - why is

[IFWP] Re:

At 08:23 PM 8/21/99 -0400, you wrote: >Hello: > >With respect to esther dyson - chairman of the icann board. I've noticed >that few people address their concerns to the pres mike roberts, instead >all concerns are directed to the chairman esther dyson - why is that. > >I normally expect the execu

No Subject

Hello: With respect to esther dyson - chairman of the icann board. I've noticed that few people address their concerns to the pres mike roberts, instead all concerns are directed to the chairman esther dyson - why is that. I normally expect the executive officers to field questions on behalf of

Re: [IFWP] accounting

Jeff and all, Jeff, a considerable amount is known about the Berkman centers influence with or over ICANN already and has been posted to this and other lists as well a written up in several op-ed pieces of the past several months. Planet Communications Computing Facility wrote: > On Sat, 21 A

Re: [IFWP] accounting

> my understanding is that estee has a friend at ogilvie who agreed to > lend ogilvies services at a greatly reduced rate If Olgilvy (sp) does this, that's great. They should be applauded. Our concern is that there be no hidden strings or sleight-of-hand transitions from "free" to "fee" s

Re: [IFWP] accounting

On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Diane Cabell wrote: > Prof. Zittrain testified as to the details of the financial relationship > between ICANN and the Berkman Center in his testimony to the House Committee on > Commerce at the July 23 hearing. His testimony is archived at > http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ic

[IFWP] Milton Mullers Petition in Berlin ICANN Conference

Ellen and all, As Ellen enumerates and reports that Miltons petition was also endorsed by INEGroup. We are over 95k members strong, in over 100 countries, and over 3000 reside in Tom Blileys home state, and they are all registered voters Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman INEGroup

Re: [IFWP] IDNO letter

Jay and all, I must concur with Jay on this. Jay Fenello wrote: > Simply appalling! > > Not only has Esther again declared herself to be > a member of the "Initial" board, not only has she > snubbed one of the best organized constituencies > (which already boasts on-line, electronic voting),

Re: [IFWP] Re: Opposition to extension of terms of interim ICANN board

Ellen and all, Excellent evaluation and a reasonable conclusion, here Ellen and one the the INEGroup supports. We would add and urge that at this juncture, and the large body of known and available evidence would not only support Ellens conclusion but should be more than ample justification

[IFWP] AMA to fund FDA!

Imagine if the American Medical Association funded the Food and Drug Administration! Imagine if the New York Stock Exchange funded the Securities and Exchange Commission! Imagine if the Teamsters funded the Federal Trade Commission! >INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS TO GET

Re: [IFWP] accounting

The Berkman Center does not pay Mr. McLaughlin's salary. I can understand why you might be confused, though. Last year he was a Berkman Fellow. This year, however, he is employed by ICANN. Also, I should point out that not all Berkman Fellows receive money; some receive the assistance of stud

Re: [IFWP] IDNO letter

Jay Fenello wrote: >Simply appalling! > >Not only has Esther again declared herself to be >a member of the "Initial" board, not only has she >snubbed one of the best organized constituencies >(which already boasts on-line, electronic voting), >but she even had the gall to send out this rebuff >wi

Re: [IFWP] IDNO letter

Simply appalling! Not only has Esther again declared herself to be a member of the "Initial" board, not only has she snubbed one of the best organized constituencies (which already boasts on-line, electronic voting), but she even had the gall to send out this rebuff with a *low* priority s

Re: [IFWP] accounting

At 03:27 AM 8/21/99 , Ellen Rony wrote: >Jeff Mason wrote: > >>once again I ask for accounting details >> >>Who are resposible for the budget details on the ICANN site. Who are the >>accountants who have developed these proforma financials. > >The website says Andrew McLaughlin is Interim Treasur

[IFWP] IDNO letter

Esther, Your comments below lead me to ask, what is your definition of a bottom-up self-organizing process? Is it one where nine unelected and unaccountable people define how the Internet community is to be represented in the technical coordination of domain names and IP addresses? Is it one t

[IFWP] from [David Post ]

>Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 09:25:52 -0400 >To: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >From: David Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [IFWP] IDNO letter >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joop Teernstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Dave Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Esther Dy

[IFWP] Re: Opposition to extension of terms of interim ICANN board

Since the link to the archive of comments on the "Proposed Resolution Concerning Term of Initial At Large Directors" at does not currently work, I am re-posting the comment I submitted to ICANN on this list, as well: