Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Adam Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 03:43:05 -0400 (EDT)
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 8 03:43:04
Wednesday, September 08, 1999
Mr. Robert Shaw, Representative Government Advisory Committee
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor
International Telecommunication Union
Place des Nations, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland via email
does anyone know why the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is not working? And who do I
contact.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 12:22:56 -0400
From: Ben Edelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ga list (fwd)
Check out www.dnso.org.
-Original
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from ["Peter J.M. Orvetti"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 13:15:26 -0400 (EDT)
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep
At 01:13 PM 9/8/99 , Pete Farmer wrote:
Those who would throw stones at ICANN would do well to consider that the
alternatives might be far worse. I'll take condescending technocrats over
clueless bureaucrats any day of the week. :-)
Technocrat, Bureaucrat, alley cat . . .
They would all be
Joe and all,
Good for you Joe. Robert Shaw has a nasty habit of this sort of
behavior that goes back several years (See gTLD-Discuss Archives).
As such it is amazing to me that the ICANN "APPOINTED" him and his
ilk to the GAC.
J. Baptista wrote:
Wednesday, September 08, 1999
Mr. Robert
Joe and all,
Joe I have sent over 20 messages to the appropriate people and called
Esther Dyson regarding the DNSO Ga list not working properly for
over a month now. I see that it is still not working. My understanding
is the list operator is Elisabeth Porteneuve. I have cc'ed here on this
Thanks Jeff:
I guess enough people are being cc'ed on this problem - so someone may
take a moment to look into it.
If the list is not working, it's not my department, but it does not look
nice.
Cheers
Joe Baptista
--
Planet Communication Computing Facility [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public
Joe and all,
I think the fact that this problem (Minor) has existed for over
a month now shows lack of accountability and competence.
J. Baptista wrote:
Thanks Jeff:
I guess enough people are being cc'ed on this problem - so someone may
take a moment to look into it.
If the list is not
Peter,
First of all, you may be unaware, but messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are archived
and/or analyzed at a number of sites on the 'net, not just the Berkman
Center ICANN-Related Discussion List Statistics page. They're also included
in Richard Sexton's archive (I don't have the URL handy
Hello:
I believe Mr. Mason attempted to address the privacy issue before in this
regards. It may prove beneficial Ben if you revisited the argument.
Many governmental freedom of information and protection of privacy offices
have addressed web related privacy. ICANN archives are by default
Ben Edelman wrote:
All that said, I'd be open to comments from the list. If the list consensus
really is contrary to my instincts -- if people want an "opt out" policy for
the archive -- I'd certainly consider as much, and the operators of other
archives might then consider doing the same.
I
--- start of forwarded message ---
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 01:31:36 -0400
From: Walter Dnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Esther Dyson: Queen of The World
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Approved:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 18:56:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jeff Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ben Edelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ga] ANNOUNCE: Santiago Constituency Recordings
well this is really pretty - no one else can post to ga -
Joe, Ben and all,
Joe is correct here. It has become painfully clear that neither ICANN
or the Berkman center in this process have much if any respect for
the privacy of any individual. This history is very clear indeed. Such
behavior on the part of ICANN and now it seems the Berkman center
Original Message
Subject: Re: Esther Dyson: Queen of The World
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 01:31:36 -0400
From: Walter Dnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
On Mon, 06 Sep 1999 03:53:17 -0400, in comp.dcom.telecom Jay Fenello
[EMAIL
Joe Baptista wrote:
Dear Mr. Shaw:
I am writing in reference to allegations and claims made by
you in your
capacity as a representative of GAC, ICANN and the ITU. Your
email to a
number of newsgroups (including the comp.dcom.telecom
conference) claimed
our employees; officers or
17 matches
Mail list logo
