Roberto and all,
ICANN is and has been unstable almost from the start. Lets look at the facts
shall we.
1.) The ICANN is financially unstable fiscally irresponsible. This
is well known public knowledge presently.
2.) It has made policy decisions that it KNOWS do not have any
Roberto and all,
Publicity has nothing what so ever to do with it. It is a matter of
keeping accurate public record. If the DNSO/ICANN cannot even
accomplish this minor task, how can anyone expect their to be
any reasonable chance of managing the Internet central resources
adequately?
I
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to my incomplete knowledge of the English language, I can't tell if it
is libel and slander, but one thing I can say.
I know Mr. Shaw personally, and I can't believe that he could think that you
and/or your company could be instrumental in the
HOW I SPENT MY SUMMER VACTION. . .
Analyzing ICANN
by Ken Freed
http://www.media-visions.com/icann.htm
Introducing ICANN
The committee that would be king.
http://www.media-visions.com/icann-intro.htm
From gTLD-MoU to ICANN
A
Ken,
Could you comment on the following excerpt from
http://www.media-visions.com/icann-gtld.htm
"Jon Postel showed his displeasure with the situation by
redirecting the root servers, temporarily disrupting world
Internet traffic."
Regards,
Werner
--
Tel: +41 22 312 5600 Direct
Werner --
What sort of comment would you like?
He was in a position to impact things,
He could. He did. What else can I say?
For the historic record on it,
check out Tony Rutkowki's
website or Ellen Rony's site.
Links are posted at --
http://www.media-visions.com/icann-informed.htm
Thanks for
Ken,
I think "disrupt" is a far too strong choice of words.
disrupt: transitive verb from REAVE implying break or burst
1: a to break apart, rupture; b to throw into disorder
2: to interrupt the normal course or unity of
My reading of events was that Postel's directive *reoriented* part
Craig --
Please deal with substantive issues,
the here and now, not ancient history.
Linguistic nit picks do not serve the
larger Internet community. Okay?
Thanks.
-- ken
Ken,
I think "disrupt" is a far too strong choice of words.
disrupt: transitive verb from REAVE implying break or burst
Anyone have any information relating to what occurred today?
(from the ICANN calendar page:)
"September 9, 1999 - Special Meeting via Telephone
The ICANN Initial Board of Directors will hold a special meeting
by telephone on Thursday, September 9, 1999, at 09:00am US Eastern
time.
would be nice to know indeed i suspect that they will approve
another extension of the testbed since nsi would sign their
capitulation papers.
more important is that i hope brock meeks is covering the
confirmation hear ings for the new administrator of NTIA.
lets hope he gets asked
Ken,
You said, more precisely, that Jon Postel temporarily
"disrupted Internet traffic" by "redirecting" the root
servers. Could you explain whose traffic was disrupted,
and how?
Regards,
Werner
Ken Freed wrote:
Werner --
What sort of comment would you like?
He was in a position to
mark and all,
Not a word thus far... More closed and secret meetings I suppose...
Mark C. Langston wrote:
Anyone have any information relating to what occurred today?
(from the ICANN calendar page:)
"September 9, 1999 - Special Meeting via Telephone
The ICANN Initial Board of
All,
FYI:
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
Werner and all,
Werner, please review the relative E-Mail list archives
for this information. Much of the information you seek
is there in some detail. Or, you could submit a FOIA
to the DOC and NTIA for this information as well on the
relative dates in question.
Werner Staub wrote:
Ken,
Michael and all,
I must concur with Michael here completely. I would add, however
that the ICANN (Initial?) Interim Board is also a partner in this
sort of disenfranchising activity to which the ICANN has involved
itself in. As such they are yet again in violation of the White paper
in this
Gordon Cook wrote:
more important is that i hope brock meeks is covering the
confirmation hear ings for the new administrator of NTIA.
Who is it?
Michael Sondow I.C.I.I.U. http://www.iciiu.org
Tel. (718)846-7482
Mark C. Langston wrote:
Anyone have any information relating to what occurred today?
A guess, maybe not too wild: NSI will sign a negotiated registrar
policy with ICANN. This policy will include most of the provisions
of ICANN's policy agreement, with a few tweeks to protect NSI
further from
Ken Freed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig --
Please deal with substantive issues,
the here and now, not ancient history.
Linguistic nit picks do not serve the
larger Internet community. Okay?
Sorry, Ken, I concur with Craig. It is one thing to temporarily declare
one site to be the master
At 05:37 PM 9/9/99 , Greg Skinner wrote:
Ken Freed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig --
Please deal with substantive issues,
the here and now, not ancient history.
Linguistic nit picks do not serve the
larger Internet community. Okay?
Sorry, Ken, I concur with Craig. It is one thing to
Gordon Cook wrote:
more important is that i hope brock meeks is covering the
confirmation hear ings for the new administrator of NTIA.
Who is it?
Michael Sondow I.C.I.I.U. http://www.iciiu.org
Tel.
On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 02:37:53PM -0700, Greg Skinner wrote:
Ken Freed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig --
Please deal with substantive issues,
the here and now, not ancient history.
Linguistic nit picks do not serve the
larger Internet community. Okay?
Sorry, Ken, I concur with
Jay Fenello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 05:37 PM 9/9/99 , Greg Skinner wrote:
Sorry, Ken, I concur with Craig. It is one thing to temporarily declare
one site to be the master root server, and quite another to disrupt
world Internet traffic.
This is right out of the Dave Crocker play book.
the social promise it brings. Mr Freed is a microbe who won't even
be a footnote.
--
Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
I'm sure as a gentleman you'll apologize for that given your sigfile
Gordon Cook wrote:
can't remember the guy's name
Tsk, tsk. Such disrepect for the leader of the organization that
brought us notables like Beckwith Burr and Larry Irving!
Michael Sondow I.C.I.I.U.
Richard J. Sexton wrote:
Mr Freed is a microbe who won't even
be a footnote.
--
Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
I'm sure as a gentleman you'll apologize for that given your sigfile
At 11:36 AM -0700 9/9/99, Mark C. Langston wrote:
Anyone have any information relating to what occurred today?
(from the ICANN calendar page:)
"September 9, 1999 - Special Meeting via Telephone
The ICANN Initial Board of Directors will hold a special meeting
by telephone on Thursday,
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Frank Rizzo wrote:
"September 9, 1999 - Secret Meeting via Telephone
^^^
You'll never know what they talked about.
Sounds good to me. Adds to the specualation. A bit like xmas, santa and
presents.
Hello:
Some time ago we attempted to correct a problem with military domain name
servers. Our attempt is indexed at:
http://www.pccf.net/correspondence/dod/
To date the problem has only gotten worse. I am writing to the Honorable
William S. Cohen Secretary of Defense and was
INTRODUCTION: This is a newsbot program created to post headlines from
DNSPolicy.com. The links below are all accessible from the front page at
http://www.dnspolicy.com/
This includes all articles posted since the last newsbot posting.
One exception, I am relinking the "The Rutt Report" story,
Craig and all --
Below is the rewritten paragraph from
http://www.media-visions.com/icann-gtld.htm
"Evidently showing his displeasure with the situation,
Jon Postel at IANA issued an electronic directive that
"reoriented" or redirected routing on some root servers.
By temporarily disrupting
30 matches
Mail list logo
