Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>
> >Can you demonstrate that there is consensus that there
> >should be a *universal* dispute resolution policy ?
> >
> >The consensus calls I've witnessed (for example, the
> >Geneva IFWP conference) came out with no consensus
> >that any dispute policy should be applied
Jeff, Secretary Daley and Congressman,
I respectfully concur with Jeff Williams suggestion here. It
would be in the best interest if action was taken as soon as
possible in this incident.
I would further add that I am very dismayed and unpleasantly
surprised at Ms. Mary Wiening's response t
Richard and all,
There is no consensus now, and it is not likely that there
will be one that is measurable at any rate.
Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> >Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 21:49:41
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >From: "Richard J. Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: UDRP
> >
> >Can you demonst
>Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 21:49:41
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "Richard J. Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: UDRP
>
>Can you demonstrate that there is consensus that there
>should be a *universal* dispute resolution policy ?
>
>The consensus calls I've witnessed (for example, the
>Geneva IFWP
WOW
Frank Rizzo wrote:
Ya' know Willy the Whiner, we're all REALLY impressed
over here with
unix prowess. Could you really set a filter?!!!
Let's all say "wow" in unison.
Most folks can handle their own filtering. Most folks aren't
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:
>
> Before anyone believes a word this particularly personality in the PCCF
> repertoire spoots off accusing Mr Kelly of acting inappropriately, it should be
> noted that the information mentioned is PUBLICLY available, and this is just
> more eviden
Ya' know Willy the Whiner, we're all REALLY impressed over here with
unix prowess. Could you really set a filter?!!!
Let's all say "wow" in unison.
Most folks can handle their own filtering. Most folks aren't as
paranoid as you. Most folks respect the 1st ammendment. Most folks
ignore the tri
Before anyone believes a word this particularly personality in the PCCF
repertoire spoots off accusing Mr Kelly of acting inappropriately, it should be
noted that the information mentioned is PUBLICLY available, and this is just
more evidence of his drivel that is intended to do nothing more than
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Kevin M. Kelly wrote:
> Hey Jeff!
>
> Before you lay your credibility on the line, you may want to note that
> PCCF.Net is registered to a Canadian Company. So, PCCF et al. probably does
> not pay Mary Wiening's salary.
Mr. Kelly:
Thank you so much for our privacy. May
Dear Secretary Daley and Congressman,
I received this exchange (See below) on a public mailing list
known as the IFWP list. I find it particularly disturbing, as did
the original recipient the very repugnant and very inappropriate
the behavior of Mary Wiening <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
in response to
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Frank Rizzo wrote:
> Joe, you must embrace the love. We need you on our team. Fight the dark side.
Frank, trust me on this one. I've got alot of love. Plenty to share.
But it helps the love to flow with a picture.
Cheers
Joe Baptista
--
Planet Communication & Computing
At 6:31 PM -0400 9/21/99, J. Baptista wrote:
>On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, J. Baptista wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm looking for a picture of Robert Shaw. Here at PCCF,m we always
> > believe in getting to know one's victim, and I would appreciate some info
>
>Oh dear .. I ment to say "our tormentor" and not "one
I disagree with you Ken.
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Ken Stubbs wrote:
> this is getting comical & pathetic.
> this kind of stuff really diminishes the value of this list.
No it does not. These very issues are critical to the GA DNSO and ICANN.
Bad civil servants simply put are one good reason why pr
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, J. Baptista wrote:
>
> I'm looking for a picture of Robert Shaw. Here at PCCF,m we always
> believe in getting to know one's victim, and I would appreciate some info
Oh dear .. I ment to say "our tormentor" and not "one's victim". As it is
Mr Shaw who has defamed us, the
I'm looking for a picture of Robert Shaw. Here at PCCF,m we always
believe in getting to know one's victim, and I would appreciate some info
on him - URL's whatever.
Thanks and Cheers
Joe Baptista
--
Planet Communication & Computing Facility [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Access Internet R
Dear Ms. Wiening:
I am replying to your email communication in respect of a Mr. Robert Shaw
of the International Telecommunications Union and your obvious
misunderstanding of your position in this.
I am making this a public issue as I feel it is critical to expose
publically bad service within t
Just following up on the Shaw information campaign to bring qualified
civil servants into the ICANN/GAC.
This are going well. Day two and some Becky Burr at NTIA keeps getting
droppings from different civil servants all over the doc.
I just got a nice reply from a lovely lady over at some doc
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Dr. Brian C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> > If any of you have brief questions - I will address them.
>
> Yeah, I got one brief question. Why is that you think that anyone here
> even gives a flying fuck about you and your one-man "think tank" that
Easy answer there. They kee
1. Full name:Joop Teernstra
2. E-mail address:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
3. Organization you work for (if apply): the Cyberspace Association/IDNO
4. Name of the person being nominated or supported: Peter Dengate-Thrush
--Joop Teernstra LL.M.-- , bootstrap of
the Cyberspace As
All,
FYI: http://www.cnnfn.com/news/technology/newsbytes/136528.html
Could this be coming attractions for the ICANN/DNSO?
Excerpts:
"Continuing its fervid assault
against state and federal online pornography laws,
the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) will go to
court Tuesday to battl
21 matches
Mail list logo
