[IFWP] Re: Doubt, change management and DisINTA-mediation by INEG stakeholders

2000-06-19 Thread Jeff Williams
Patrick and all, Standing! And please check your headers on Kent's posts frequently. I do. In retrospect, I find it terribly funny some of the posts contributed to me in various ways. Most especially those that I have seen in the past couple of days from Kent (Forged headers posting as me)

Re: [IFWP] That register.com commercial

2000-06-19 Thread Jeff Williams
Ellen and all, Yes indeed. And it is too bad that ICANN doesn't enforce their own policies upon their Registrars. Ellen Rony wrote: > The Registrar Accreditation Agreement implies a prohibition against > warehousing of domain names: > > http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-12may99.ht

Re: [IFWP] That register.com commercial

2000-06-19 Thread Richard J. Sexton
>> >9. Registrar shall abide by any ICANN-adopted policy prohibiting or >> >restricting warehousing of or\ speculation in domain names by registrars. >> >> >> That's a stretch. These are domains used for advertising. >> > >I smell loophole. Specifically, I could just take out a full-page ad >an

Re: [IFWP] That register.com commercial

2000-06-19 Thread Ellen Rony
>At 10:33 AM 6/19/00 -0700, you wrote: >>The Registrar Accreditation Agreement implies a prohibition against >>warehousing of domain names: >> >>http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-12may99.htm >> >> >>9. Registrar shall abide by any ICANN-adopted policy prohibiting or >>restricting wareho

Re: [IFWP] That register.com commercial

2000-06-19 Thread Mark C. Langston
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 02:06:33PM -0400, Richard J. Sexton wrote: > At 10:33 AM 6/19/00 -0700, you wrote: > >The Registrar Accreditation Agreement implies a prohibition against > >warehousing of domain names: > > > >http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-12may99.htm > > > > > >9. Registrar

Re: [IFWP] That register.com commercial

2000-06-19 Thread Richard J. Sexton
At 10:33 AM 6/19/00 -0700, you wrote: >The Registrar Accreditation Agreement implies a prohibition against >warehousing of domain names: > >http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-12may99.htm > > >9. Registrar shall abide by any ICANN-adopted policy prohibiting or >restricting warehousing of

Re: [IFWP] That register.com commercial

2000-06-19 Thread Ellen Rony
The Registrar Accreditation Agreement implies a prohibition against warehousing of domain names: http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-12may99.htm 9. Registrar shall abide by any ICANN-adopted policy prohibiting or restricting warehousing of or\ speculation in domain names by registrars.

Re: [IFWP] There's something dirty in the works

2000-06-19 Thread Joe Baptista
On Sat, 17 Jun 2000, William S. Lovell wrote: > Hi, guys and gals: > > I find in the following, > > http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/la/archive/remotes-110299.html, > > that I was a "remote participant" in an ICANN to-do. Sorry, but > I was not. Check it out and see how many others of you

[IFWP] Mild amusement, disgust at Measday.

2000-06-19 Thread Roeland Meyer (E-mail)
> Behalf Of Mark Measday: Monday, June 19, 2000 4:00 AM > I'd be interested for comments on the following partial note, from all > those who are Jeff Williams, those passing through a Jeff > Williams phase > and those still pretending not to be Jeff Williams. I apologise for > thinking aloud (aga

Re: [IFWP] That register.com commercial

2000-06-19 Thread Mikki Barry
>I'm curious about something. Many of you have probably seen the >register.com commericals, where they have people touting the domains >they've registered (e.g., sisterearth.com, hydrowatts.com, thefabers.com). >Checking the whois database, of course, reveals all these domains are >actually owned

[IFWP] BOUNCE list@ifwp.org: Non-member submission from ["Kevin M. Kelly" ]

2000-06-19 Thread Richard J. Sexton
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from ["Kevin M. Kelly" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] >Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 08:08:35 -0400 (EDT) > >>From [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: Re: [IFWP] Doubt, change management and DisINTA-mediation by INEG stakeholders: was: There's something dirty in the works

2000-06-19 Thread measday
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:59:49 +0200 From: Mark Measday [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Josmarian SA To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], non-commer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Domain policy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kent, I'd be interested for comme

Subject: Re: [IFWP] Doubt, change management and DisINTA-mediation by INEG stakeholders: was: There's something dirty in the works

2000-06-19 Thread measday
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:59:49 +0200 From: Mark Measday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Josmarian SA To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], non-commer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Domain policy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 Kent, I'd

Re: [IFWP] Doubt, change management and DisINTA-mediation by INEG stakeholders: was: There's something dirty in the works

2000-06-19 Thread Mark Measday
Kent, I'd be interested for comments on the following partial note, from all those who are Jeff Williams, those passing through a Jeff Williams phase and those still pretending not to be Jeff Williams. I apologise for thinking aloud (again), sententiously and badly, but it is not only something t