Patrick and all,
Standing! And please check your headers on Kent's posts frequently.
I do.
In retrospect, I find it terribly funny some of the posts contributed to
me in various ways. Most especially those that I have seen in the
past couple of days from Kent (Forged headers posting as me)
Ellen and all,
Yes indeed. And it is too bad that ICANN doesn't enforce their
own policies upon their Registrars.
Ellen Rony wrote:
> The Registrar Accreditation Agreement implies a prohibition against
> warehousing of domain names:
>
> http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-12may99.ht
>> >9. Registrar shall abide by any ICANN-adopted policy prohibiting or
>> >restricting warehousing of or\ speculation in domain names by registrars.
>>
>>
>> That's a stretch. These are domains used for advertising.
>>
>
>I smell loophole. Specifically, I could just take out a full-page ad
>an
>At 10:33 AM 6/19/00 -0700, you wrote:
>>The Registrar Accreditation Agreement implies a prohibition against
>>warehousing of domain names:
>>
>>http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-12may99.htm
>>
>>
>>9. Registrar shall abide by any ICANN-adopted policy prohibiting or
>>restricting wareho
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 02:06:33PM -0400, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> At 10:33 AM 6/19/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >The Registrar Accreditation Agreement implies a prohibition against
> >warehousing of domain names:
> >
> >http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-12may99.htm
> >
> >
> >9. Registrar
At 10:33 AM 6/19/00 -0700, you wrote:
>The Registrar Accreditation Agreement implies a prohibition against
>warehousing of domain names:
>
>http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-12may99.htm
>
>
>9. Registrar shall abide by any ICANN-adopted policy prohibiting or
>restricting warehousing of
The Registrar Accreditation Agreement implies a prohibition against
warehousing of domain names:
http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-12may99.htm
9. Registrar shall abide by any ICANN-adopted policy prohibiting or
restricting warehousing of or\ speculation in domain names by registrars.
On Sat, 17 Jun 2000, William S. Lovell wrote:
> Hi, guys and gals:
>
> I find in the following,
>
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/la/archive/remotes-110299.html,
>
> that I was a "remote participant" in an ICANN to-do. Sorry, but
> I was not. Check it out and see how many others of you
> Behalf Of Mark Measday: Monday, June 19, 2000 4:00 AM
> I'd be interested for comments on the following partial note,
from all
> those who are Jeff Williams, those passing through a Jeff
> Williams phase
> and those still pretending not to be Jeff Williams. I apologise
for
> thinking aloud (aga
>I'm curious about something. Many of you have probably seen the
>register.com commericals, where they have people touting the domains
>they've registered (e.g., sisterearth.com, hydrowatts.com, thefabers.com).
>Checking the whois database, of course, reveals all these domains are
>actually owned
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from ["Kevin M. Kelly"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 08:08:35 -0400 (EDT)
>
>>From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:59:49 +0200
From: Mark Measday [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Josmarian SA
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
non-commer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Domain policy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kent,
I'd be interested for comme
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:59:49 +0200
From: Mark Measday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Josmarian SA
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
non-commer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Domain policy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4
Kent,
I'd
Kent,
I'd be interested for comments on the following partial note, from all
those who are Jeff Williams, those passing through a Jeff Williams phase
and those still pretending not to be Jeff Williams. I apologise for
thinking aloud (again), sententiously and badly, but it is not only
something t
14 matches
Mail list logo