I understand John's position with resepct to the zone file. dot.GOD makes
it's zone file available to the dns - unlike John were not concerned with
respect to privacy because that option has already been programmed into
the whois. I personally can get alot of data out of a zone file and
associa
As you all know - it's tradition for me to mass mail my governments just
prior to an ICANN meeting. This year I'm reaching out and touching over
48,000 civil servants in Australia - Japan - the United States and Canada
in 6 hours. One thing I love doing is communicating with my governments -
ce
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "Richard J. Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Re[4]: [ga] Press Release Warns Internet Users about ICANN
>Cc: "William X. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> John P
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "Richard J. Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Re[2]: [ga] Press Release Warns Internet Users about ICANN
>Cc: "William X. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> John P
The GAO report on ICANN has been completed.
It will be published soon (possibly tomorrow, July 7.)
--karl--
If the ACLU, EPIC, and CPSR are so concerned about Internet
democracy, why have they waited silently during the past two years
while ICANN was being created and consolidating its power? They have
known all along what was going on. Why have they done nothing until
now?
The answer almost certainly
FYI:
>Warning of Thorny Online Issues Ahead, Cyber-Rights Groups Form Internet
>Democracy Project
>
>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Amy Weil, ACLU, (212) 549-2561 or 2666
>Andrew Shen, EPIC, (202) 483-1140 / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, July 6, 2000
>
>NEW YORK -- Seeking to strengthen civil so
ICANN has so far not responded to the attached questions.
I've continued to inquire into the issue of liability of "volunteer"
directors of California non-profits and what I have found concerns me.
There are several statutes that purport to protect "volunteer" directors.
But they are subject
"!Dr. Joe Baptista" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, James Love wrote:
>
> > Internet, and management of all TLDs. However, not all registries
> > should be required to provide first come first serve type services. For
> > example, in a .union TLD, if such a TLD is managed by labor unions, they
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
> Name.space's excessive claims to TLDs have surely forfeited any rights
> they might want to claim in any given TLD. Surely even those who
> believe in this "prior" right issue of registries that knowingly
> operated outside the real operation scope
10 matches
Mail list logo
