Chris and all,
A proud sponser of ICANN in Yokohama, eh? Kinda
says it all Chris...
Christopher Ambler wrote:
Michael, you presume too much, both about Image Online
Design and myself.
I have no desire to argue with you, other than to say that
you're wrong about me.
Believe what you
I have had it confirmed, ICANN still does not have IRS 501(c) status.
Their application is apparently, after 18 months, still pending.
(This is not surprising given that ICANN is trying to squeeze into
501(c)(3) and doesn't really seem to fit into any of the defined
categories of 501(c)(3).)
Chris and all,
Very nicely done from about half of what I have read thus far
in my first reading.
Oh, you might also want to remove the following from your
home pag : " .WEB, The .WEB Internet Domain Registry, and The.WEB are
trademarks of Image Online Design, Inc. All rights reserved.",
Karl and all,
Yes I have been following this situation very closely as well
and can also confirm that at least the IRS has not accepted
ICANN as a 501(c)(3) status, and cannot really determine
at this juncture whether or not they should be granted
such a status.
Given the nature of ICANN as
Ron, Chris and all,
From a independent point of view we [INEGroup] see
IOD as in a battle for it's very existence. This would of course
include Chris Ambler. I have chided and disagreed with Chris
in the past and will likely do so again in the future, but his
response to ICANN seems, as I
Chris and all,
Ok, but they are not registered TM's at this time as you seem to
indicate. And you have 90 days in which to file an appeal I believe...
I would suggest that unless you have allot of NEW evidence you
do not file an appeal, as it will be denied abruptly.
Christopher Ambler
This attachment is funny - a communication between australian civil
servants concerning god. It's beuatiful.
regards
Joe Baptista
http://www.dot.god/
dot.GOD Hostmaster
+1
Joe Baptista
http://www.dot.god/
dot.GOD Hostmaster
+1 (805) 753-8697
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 06:19:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe
One thing I find about the civil service is the occassional entertainment
on can get from their responses. This one is good - he does not like the
address baptista.god - he finds it offensive. However as a US taxpayer I
can say with some certainty that I'm not paying for their opinions.
Now - this one I think is a civil servant - even though he's using a
hotmail account to hide his identity. He's claimed I have sent the civil
service a "Macro virus" - whatever that may be. If I read his claims
correctly a macro virus is anything that give the civil service a little
extra work
10 matches
Mail list logo
