The root Zone is minuscule these days relative to the size, for
instance of Windoze.
Or IE or OutLook, etc, ad nauseum...
How many bytes is it Richard?
368738 bytes
It got pretty big when we added the Name Space tlds.
--
Clique \Clique\, n. [F., fr. OF. cliquer to click. See Click, v. i.]
At 01:03 AM 3/18/02 -0700, you wrote:
Wasn't the original idea a decentralized network that could survive a nuke
attack?
Not exactly, but close enough. But that's why you should primary the root
for yourself, you rely even less on the n-way redundent root servers.
Should decentralization of the
Doesn't name.space have some colliders,the same TLD delegated to more than
one administrator in the inclusive TLD universe?
[Aside: .SHEESH still is a collider because Adam Todd REFUSES to make the
simple redelegation change I have been requesting for 1.5 years. One
excuse after another.]
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, at 08:04 [=GMT-0800], Ellen Rony wrote:
[Aside: .SHEESH still is a collider because Adam Todd REFUSES to make the
simple redelegation change I have been requesting for 1.5 years. One
excuse after another.]
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't this just a matter of a root
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, at 22:00 [=GMT-0500], Richard J. Sexton wrote:
and in fact, if you adopt the recommended practice of running your own
private root server [1] then the ORSC servers could get taken out by that
same thunderbolt and everything would still work for us. root servers
are a
There is no Internet Governance involved with ICANN, except for the
hidden agenda of gaining control of Information Distribution by means
of contracts binding users of DNS names to control by the name
delegators who in fact have no natural reason to be controlling
what people do with their
Isn't 368738 bytes well within the max size limit of a single SNMP message?
Cheers...\Stef
At 10:07 AM -0500 3/18/02, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
The root Zone is minuscule these days relative to the size, for
instance of Windoze.
Or IE or OutLook, etc, ad nauseum...
How many bytes is
Yes, you are correct, and I don't know why any of the root zone operators
would point to his AURSC or IRSC knowing this.
Seems like there should be encouragement to route around anyone who doesn't
handle the responsibily ethically and professionally, but then comes the
question abo9ut who
Internet governance my butt. This is just about domain names. If all
you do on the net is send mail, read usenet news and use IRC you'll
probably never hear of icann; it has no affect on any of those things.
--
Clique \Clique\, n. [F., fr. OF. cliquer to click. See Click, v. i.]
A narrow
At 08:04 AM 3/18/02 -0800, you wrote:
Doesn't name.space have some colliders,the same TLD delegated to more than
one administrator in the inclusive TLD universe?
Maybe 2 of them. 2 out of a thousand isn't bad.
[Aside: .SHEESH still is a collider because Adam Todd REFUSES to make the
simple
At 08:14 AM 3/18/02 -0800, you wrote:
Isn't 368738 bytes well within the max size limit of a single SNMP message?
Beats me. It's been years since I've even looked at SNMP.
--
Clique \Clique\, n. [F., fr. OF. cliquer to click. See Click, v. i.]
A narrow circle of persons associated by common
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:55:37 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OpenSRS Live Reseller Update - 04/18/02
Greetings -
Please find following an update on OpenSRS.
1. .us landrush order logic
-
Please be advised
No, I don't mean per any protocol.
Is it not typical to receive messages in the size range of 368738
bytes?...\Stef
At 11:40 AM -0500 3/18/02, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
At 08:14 AM 3/18/02 -0800, you wrote:
Isn't 368738 bytes well within the max size limit of a single SNMP message?
Beats
We should interpret Adam Todd's refusal as a request for removal.
Simple action, positive result!...\Stef
At 8:04 AM -0800 3/18/02, Ellen Rony wrote:
Doesn't name.space have some colliders,the same TLD delegated to more than
one administrator in the inclusive TLD universe?
[Aside: .SHEESH
Go to http://icannwatch.org and vote your conscience.
(see the top right corner)
--
Clique \Clique\, n. [F., fr. OF. cliquer to click. See Click, v. i.]
A narrow circle of persons associated by common interests or
for the accomplishment of a common purpose; -- generally used
in a bad
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, at 11:40 [=GMT-0500], Richard J. Sexton wrote:
[1] http://cr.yp.to/dnsroot.html or http://support.open-rsc.org
I do this on my home Windows box
Slaving root? How? Windows9*?
There's a $35 piece of sofware called Simple DNS+ that puts bind to shame
for ease of
There's a $35 piece of sofware called Simple DNS+ that puts bind to shame
for ease of use anf user friendlyness. http://www.jhsoft.com/ There's a 30
day free trial. I tried it and paid for it, it's really quite amazing; it does
caching, authoritative nameservice and zone transfers.
Works
Will it run on OSX? Cheers...\Stef
At 8:52 PM -0500 3/18/02, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
There's a $35 piece of sofware called Simple DNS+ that puts
bind to shame
for ease of use anf user friendlyness. http://www.jhsoft.com/ There's a 30
day free trial. I tried it and paid for it, it's
At 08:09 PM 3/18/02 -0800, you wrote:
Will it run on OSX? Cheers...\Stef
No, it's a windows program. Isn't OSX just BSD with a Mac GUI?
--
Clique \Clique\, n. [F., fr. OF. cliquer to click. See Click, v. i.]
A narrow circle of persons associated by common interests or
for the
Farber suggests the IAB:
Jay.
(when did he join the PFIR?)
At 3/18/02 10:34 PM, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility wrote:
Overcoming ICANN: Forging Better Paths for the Internet
March 18, 2002
PFIR - People For Internet
Sort of.
Its lineage is via NeXT, which includes NeXT STEP and some other
non-unix stuff.
It has a MACH kernel, among other things. So, lots of stuff will
port easily, but not all.
the people I talk to love it, and say It is REAL UNIX which I
believe, but I do not have much info on what
Well if it's real unix then djbdns should work: http://cr.yp.to/djbdns
At 10:30 PM 3/18/02 -0800, you wrote:
Sort of.
Its lineage is via NeXT, which includes NeXT STEP and some other
non-unix stuff.
It has a MACH kernel, among other things. So, lots of stuff will
port easily, but not all.
Internet governance my butt. This is just about domain names. If all
you do on the net is send mail, read usenet news and use IRC you'll
probably never hear of icann; it has no affect on any of those things.
Only for a heartbeat. ENUM. When your wireless number folds into the DNS and
you can't
23 matches
Mail list logo
