[IFWP] Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours (fwd)

get http://www.linuxnic.net/ - been like that for a few days. Regards Joe -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 21:31:55 -0500 (EST) From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTE

[IFWP] Linux Top Level Domain Registrar

Does anyone know what's going on with the Linux Top Level Domain Registrar .linux. http://www.linuxnic.net/ does not respond. Regards Joe Baptista

[IFWP] .SUCKS

.COM, .ORG, AND -- .SUCKS? (Source: The Industry Standard) How would you like to see the following top-level domains: .unite, ..isnotfair and .sucks? http://www.e-businessworld.com/go.cgi?id=233500

[IFWP] The Internet Daily: Fortune 500 ripe for cybersquatters-03/02/2000

Fortune 500 ripe for cybersquatters More than half of the largest companies in the United States have failed to protect themselves in cyberspace. NameEngine.com, a company which registers Web domains and researches their ownership, reported Thursday 265 of the Fortune

[IFWP] Cpvert ICANN propaganda - WHO OWNS THE INTERNET?

WHO OWNS THE INTERNET? (Source: IDG.net) The infrastructure behind the Internet is owned by a handful of powerful corporations that can, and often do, exercise their control. http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=233353

[IFWP] 4. Dropping the ".com"

In a curious turn against the current, InfoSpace said today it will drop the ".com" from its name. The move is part of the company's attempt to revamp its image into a behind-the-scenes player that makes Web sites more compelling, rather than a company that deals directly with Net consumer

[IFWP] [Random-bits] Declan: A Ralph Nader Plan That 'Sucks' (fwd)

-- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 14:16:20 -0500 From: James Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Multiple recipients of list RANDOM-BITS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Random-bits] Declan: A Ralph Nader Plan That 'Sucks' This is Declan's article. One clarification. CP

Re: [IFWP] Re: I have no idea what this is - Forwarded mail....

any indication as to whom he may be or what affiliation(s) > he may have. I also find no listing for him anywhere with that E-Mail > address. GIven he is using "INEGroup" as his user ID, I find this > a bit strange, he is not on our membership list BTW. > > !Dr. Joe Baptis

[IFWP] Re: I have no idea what this is - Forwarded mail....

from the HTTP access log for Baptista's > Mubarak page. > > On Tue, 29 Feb 2000 22:30:09 -0600, "Gary Peake" wrote: > >On Tue, 29 Feb 2000 21:37:42 -0500, "!Dr. Joe Baptista" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >wrote: > > >I got this really weird message -

[IFWP] ICANN SEES HEALTHY RESPONSE TO OPEN MEMBERSHIP

ICANN SEES HEALTHY RESPONSE TO OPEN MEMBERSHIP (Source: IDG.net) Since opening its membership Web site on Feb. 25, ICANN has seen the applications pour in from around the world. http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=233038

[IFWP] Re: [IPN] ICANN asked to create .union, .sucks and other new TLDs

Dear James: I strongly support your groups committments to establish the listed top level domain in your request to ICANN. However I must advise you that ICANN is not the TLD permission granting body. I'm sure you understand most of us think of ICANN as a glorified farce. You should take the

Re: [IFWP] [IPN] ICANN asked to create .union, .sucks and other newTLDs (fwd)

On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Michael Sondow wrote: > A more honest approach would be for CPT and Essential Org to simply > create those domain names, serve them from the alternate root > servers like vrx.net and/or NameSpace, and announce to the public > that they were available. Since when do the taxpa

[IFWP] [IPN] ICANN asked to create .union, .sucks and other new TLDs (fwd)

-- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 19:43:43 -0500 From: James Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: info-policy-notes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [IPN] ICANN asked to create .union, .sucks and other new TLDs http://www.cptech.org/ecom/icann/tlds-march1-2000.html

[IFWP] RE: [ga] Who has standing

This sort of thing has been discussed here before. To be aware of the DNSO all you need is access to a computer - I'm not surprised a telco civl servant would be ignorant of that. On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Jean-Michel Becar wrote: > Kent and Nii, > > Please don't say that I said that developing coun

[IFWP] ICANN - Cairo and the Egyptian Government

I recently sent the following complaint to the Egyptian Government. Let's hope the violence I predicted never comes - things have been quite, but if news that a US government body like ICANN was holding a meeting in a politically unstable climate like Cairo - I hate to think of what might happen.

[IFWP] RE: http://edit.webring.org/cgi-bin/membercgi?ring=icann&addform&ring=icann;addform

art? On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Judith Oppenheimer wrote: > explanation? > > -Original Message- > From: Owner-Domain-Policy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of !Dr. Joe Baptista > Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 10:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: >

[IFWP] http://edit.webring.org/cgi-bin/membercgi?ring=icann&addform&ring=icann;addform

interesting .. http://edit.webring.org/cgi-bin/membercgi?ring=icann&addform&ring=icann;addform

[IFWP] I have no idea what this is - Forwarded mail....

I got this really weird message - All it says is Woof Woof and then there's a bunch of domain names/host names attacked. Now the question I have is why? Im posting it here because netsol is listed, there's the australian goverment and zintrain of harvard and visa. Makes me nervous when I get th

[IFWP] [IPN] Hague Convention on Jurisdiction (fwd)

-- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:43:44 -0500 From: James Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: info-policy-notes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [IPN] Hague Convention on Jurisdiction http://www.cptech.org/ecom/hague-march-2000.html Meeting in Ottawa on the Hague Conventi

[IFWP] here we go again

poor icann http://www.earth-net.net/mahir-icann/

[IFWP] Re: Please read this if you have a domain with Network Solutions!

an unhappy customer. On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Vin Diaz wrote: > Here's a horror story I wish had never happened. Everybody who uses the > CRYPT-PW auth scheme with Network Solutions please read: > > Yesterday I modified the DNS servers for a domain name that I have > registered with Network Soluti

[IFWP] RE: [ga] Proposal: WWW / slashdot

That depends on what your buying. The problem with ICANN is that it's a false bill of goods. It's an international farce fueled by demented civil servants. The membership is also limited and we still have to see if the members can co-ordinate with each other. Well see. Regards Joe Baptista O

[IFWP] RE: [ga] Proposal: WWW / slashdot

+33 4 92 94 43 15 > Fax: +33 4 92 38 52 15 > GSM: +33 6 82 80 19 31 > > > -Original Message- > From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 11:22 AM > To: Jean-Michel Becar > Cc: 'Harald Tveit Alvestrand'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

[IFWP] Re: [idno] Nominations -(GUEST) And a Wager for Joe and the IDNO...>;)

n by CA/ IDNO standards. May we have some discipline please!!! (If not > > self-discipline, perhaps too much to ask for among this group, at least some > > corporate discipline. We are already a laughing stock, why feed the flames with >this > > stuff? > > > > Kar

[IFWP] Re: [idno] Nominations

William is being malicious again in his own special way. Ever time the poor boy loses his position in anything - he end up nominating me. I'm sharing your nomination William with everyone else so we can share your stupidity and malicious affections for me. I of course decline such nomination.

[IFWP] RE: [ga] Proposal: WWW / slashdot

not in the icann cards - nor do I expect icann for reasons of privacy to share any information with the ga nitwits. On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Jean-Michel Becar wrote: > Harald, > > Yes of course, I wrote this Email earlier in the morning and I only though > afterwards I was writing something not eno

[IFWP] Love on ICANN and top level domains

-- Forwarded message -- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 10:41:33 -0500 From: James Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Multiple recipients of list RANDOM-BITS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Random-bits] ICANN and top level domains This is something I am working on with regarding to ICANN and

[IFWP] ICANN At Large Membership (fwd)

Look at this. When you join - you still have to wait to be approved ;-0 I wonder what that means. Maybe it's like a priest thing, ester has to bless each membership by slobbering over it. Regards Joe -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 21:24:57 -0800 From: [EMAIL PR

[IFWP] Re: wipo quotes

The fee schedule is entertaining http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/fees/index.html you can submitt your complaints in bulk and have a choice of panalists - 1 or the tribunal arrangement - bury them with three. Very entertaining. On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, domainiac wrote: > WIPO sure makes a lot of i

[IFWP] Re: Simple ICIIU questions provoke paranoia on the IFWP list?

William - you really need a life, something - anything - to keep that tool busy. Get yourself a girlfriend or boyfriend - whatever makes your tool happy - and get busy. Regards Joe Baptista On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, William X. Walsh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > O

Re: mistaken identity Re: [IFWP] http://www.iciiu.org

On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Richard J. Sexton wrote: > >> Now I'm really confused. What's Gobrachov got to do with this? > > > >Gobrachov is the one who's buying network solutions. > > But I thought that was just a rumor. Where do the otters > fit in to all this ? The otters are doing the bridge fin

Re: mistaken identity Re: [IFWP] http://www.iciiu.org

On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Richard J. Sexton wrote: > >There's only one Michael here. And one Mikael. > > Now I'm really confused. What's Gobrachov got to do with this? Gobrachov is the one who's buying network solutions.

[IFWP] Re: Simple ICIIU questions provoke paranoia on the IFWP list?

On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, William X. Walsh wrote: > Someone who knows I am preparing to add some material about Mr Sondow and his > one man International Congress of Independent Internet Users forwarding me a > thread on the IFWP list today/tonight that show a flurry of activity from the > VRX.net/PC

Re: [IFWP] RE: [ga] *IF* ICANN fails what about UN?

On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Michael Sondow wrote: > Don't waste your time with the Berkman people, Mr. Baptista. They're > nothing more than a bunch of hangers-on that have been swept into > the spotlight through colluding with ICANN. What they say has always > been gibberish. They don't give a hoot ab

Re: [IFWP] http://www.iciiu.org

On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Mikael Pawlo wrote: > However, Michael Sondow surely can and will sort this out. He's usually a > good guy even if we sometimes disagree. I agree sondow is a good human being. He's been in this fight for a long time, and unlike most of the wiltered flowers we have strande

Re: [IFWP] http://www.iciiu.org

You have to promise not to tell anyone that the ICIIU and Vrx are bying network solution. It's an official rumour. Regards Joe Baptista On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Dan Steinberg wrote: > So what does it take to become a member, Richard? > > > Mikael Pawlo wrote: > > > > On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Richar

Re: [IFWP] http://www.iciiu.org

privacy is not a matter of secrecy - it is a right in law. There are other minor issues like competitive advantage in there, but I think a right to privacy is sufficient. Don't you? On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Mikael Pawlo wrote: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Richard J. Sexton wrote: > > >Dear Friends, > >

[IFWP] RE: [ga] *IF* ICANN fails what about UN?

On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Ben Edelman wrote: > In my prior message, I should also have mentioned an article in the Berkley > Technology Law Journal that Jonathan wrote on the same subject -- expanding > in somewhat greater detail on the question of "What if ICANN Fails?" > >

[IFWP] Domain Insurance

I've censored this document to protect the various parties. However - I feel domain insurance is a issue that's long overdue. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:56:41 -0500 (EST) From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [IFWP]

[IFWP] lawyers can at times be suck clowns - or the future of the GA@DNSO.org

I see the Berkman boys have been doing extreme work with their tools. And the Markel Foundation is paying for it. This "software" should be somewhat entertaining. I do have serious doubts it will amount to anything of value - except for more ICANN/IBM/Berman propaganda. Little Ben Edleman our

[IFWP] I-D ACTION:draft-terrell-logic-analy-bin-ip-spec-ipv7-ipv8-03.txt(fwd)

-- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 06:36:57 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: IETF-Announce: ; Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-terrell-logic-analy-bin-ip-spec-ipv7-ipv8-03.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title

[IFWP] Re: [ga] Suspension of posting rights for William Walsh and JoeBaptista

Harald: You made a specific decision to effect a suspension of myself from the GA. I trust such a decision was made with supporting evidence - so I ask you again to provide me with details. You response of referring me to the mailing list is unacceptable. I need specific references to message

[IFWP] Next stop - ICANN Egypt

Well - I'm got my robots visiting the entire egyptian government structure. About 110 ministires are online. I'm about to speak to the civil service in egypt about my opinion of ICANN freeky frolloppy trips to Mars. I warned ICANN about the potential for violent demostration. Arabs are hot bl

Re: [IFWP] Suspension of posting rights for William Walsh and Joe Baptista (fwd)

On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote: > We were dragged along, kicking and screaming, just like everyone else. I can > guarantee you that NSI didn't volunteer. Those whom opposed the ICANN, in > Sep98, have NOT been mollified. If anything, many of us feel vindicated. I for one feel ve

Re: [IFWP] Suspension of posting rights for William Walsh and Joe Baptista (fwd)

will be their undoing sooner or later. > And when it is it will be a very hard fall for them. > > BTW do you still have those E-Mail addresses I sent you for > Roberto stuff? If not let me know. > > !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > > > 'm not that concerned - except

Re: [IFWP] Suspension of posting rights for William Walsh and Joe Baptista (fwd)

On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Gary Peake wrote: > And we poor bas&*^%s in alt.www.webmaster wonder why things have been so > screwed up since Network Solutions lost their monopoly. > > If you guys thought it was bad then, you have no idea how totally mucked up > it is now. I think this mailing list is a

Re: [IFWP] Suspension of posting rights for William Walsh and Joe Baptista (fwd)

s little childish games. > Of course you know some of them yourself. Let's concentrate in insuring > that Harald and Roberto learn the error in their fradulent ways. Keep the > Heat turned up on them at every turn. > > !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > > > The GA illega

[IFWP] Suspension of posting rights for William Walsh and Joe Baptista(fwd)

The GA illegally elected alternate chair has choose to screw myself and Walsh together. Hurray ;-) Walsh will now be able to dedicate his time to domain policy ;-) -and I think that desearves a big hurray. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 14:20:30 +0100 From: Hara

[IFWP] the loony Walsh vote.

I want to thank everyone for having voted for me at the netwit walsh polling booth. http://www.inegroup.com/pollBooth.php3?qid=nextnitwit I've recieved in excess of 50% of the vote - beating out Joop and Snodow. I'm very pleased with the results and want to send special thanks to my cgo users g

[IFWP] Re: help support walsh - vote for me

-rizzz > > > At 7:47 AM -0500 2/17/00, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > >How silly of me - I forgot to post the address. > > > >http://www.inegroup.com/pollBooth.php3?qid=nextnitwit > > > >remember - vote for me and vote often. I want walsh to live

[IFWP] Re: help support walsh - vote for me

How silly of me - I forgot to post the address. http://www.inegroup.com/pollBooth.php3?qid=nextnitwit remember - vote for me and vote often. I want walsh to live and breath me. It's something he's good at. On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > > As all of you

[IFWP] Re: [Attention Harald, Esther Dyson, and Becky Burr] to:Re: [ga]disclaimer

nd carried out in full and without delay. > > This is all I have to say on this matter, any further comments, questions > or considerations regarding this matter may be sent to James Touton > at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for his consideration and dispensation. > > > !Dr. Joe Bapt

Re: Private Post to:Re: [IFWP] IAEA - THIS IS CUTE - Antispam domainblock (fwd)

t is ok with you? > > This one (See below) is just too heavily censored to be of much use > as I see it. What are your thoughts? > > !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > > > This is a juicy tid bit. Of course Roberto won't be getting this > > one. The IAEA's ant

[IFWP] dot .pn

at least the web site http://www.nic.pn/ is pretty - looks like it was put together in a hurry - but it's pretty. regards joe On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Jeff Williams wrote: > Richard and all, > > I would suggest a much closer checking on this.. .PN is hosted by 2day.com. > > I will leave right t

Re: [IFWP] dot .pn

i don't think the cctld's are very happy - it looks all cat and mouse to me. On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Richard J. Sexton wrote: > At 02:31 AM 2/16/00 -0500, you wrote: > > > >I am under the impression that by swtiching dot.pn over to the islanders > >is going to cause a bit of a problem for ICANN - h

[IFWP] dot .pn

I am under the impression that by swtiching dot.pn over to the islanders is going to cause a bit of a problem for ICANN - have not the cctld operators formed a pack - if one goes - the whole lot walks. Cairo should be entertaining. Regards Joe Baptista

[IFWP] Re: alternate gTLD namespace - was Re: XXX domains

for William Walsh's Tool/Toy > for instance something like walshhasnt.clue or WXWno.clue for instance. > Of course there are other permiations that would be very fitting as well... > > !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > > > Oh - I would never operate a wholesome family values se

[IFWP] alternate gTLD namespace - was Re: XXX domains

Baptista On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Jeff Williams wrote: > Joe and all, > > Well when you get .wholesome or .holesome up I want IAM.wholesome > or sheis.holesome. >;) Let me know, I will send you a check! >;) > > !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > > > Also don't forget

Re: [IFWP] Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough

quot;Club". That is fine > I suppose, but hardly representative of anything legitimately > > !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > > > I'm cross posting this to make sure other members of the community can > > follow this insanity. > > > > I and Walsh agree

[IFWP] Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough

I'm cross posting this to make sure other members of the community can follow this insanity. I and Walsh agree that for the GA@DNSO to get any works of substance done, it is critical that we meet the chairs and NC's definition of real person. Yes - the chair and alternate have avoided this issu

[IFWP] IAEA - THIS IS CUTE - Antispam domain block (fwd)

This is a juicy tid bit. Of course Roberto won't be getting this one. The IAEA's anti spam list seems to be getting a little ratty, And offensive to a major government. This is a choice tid bit which I will have to forward to the highest authorities in the IAEA. I tell ya folks - when you di

[IFWP] Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgements

from Love .. --- The Hague Conference on Private International Law has issued a preliminary draft for a "Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters." This contains controversial elements regarding electronic commerce. There will be a meeting of ecommerce e

[IFWP] Re: [ga] GA Rules don't go far enough

William - congratulation we agree. This must me an internet first. On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, William X. Walsh wrote: > I again renew my call that all members of the GA list must validate by some > form of identification, such as a govt. issued ID. I completely agree. I for one am more then willin

[IFWP] [Random-bits] TACD statement on ICANN (fwd)

-- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 13:26:19 -0500 From: James Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Multiple recipients of list RANDOM-BITS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Random-bits] TACD statement on ICANN The following is the text of one of the resolutions approved by t

[IFWP] Re: [ga] [Admin] Removal of monitoring for Joe Baptista

Harald - I would appreciate if you would not respond in private to a very public matter. It is not possible for you to hide here - the damage has been done. On Sun, 13 Feb 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: > >I disagree. It is critical that civil servans who participate in this > >process n

[IFWP] Re: [ga] [Admin] Removal of monitoring for Joe Baptista

On Sun, 13 Feb 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: > Mr. Baptista, > may I remind you that threats are not considered a normal part of civilized > discourse, and your private (and petty) "revenges" are not a subject matter > for the GA list. I disagree. It is critical that civil servans wh

[IFWP] Re: [ga] Another Resignation

On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Mark Measday wrote: > Mr Auerbach's proposal that the ga constitute itself as a audit >function of DNSO and relevant ICANN proceedings also had extreme merit, >in my view. I am in full support of this. > I had hoped that Mr Gaetano's Chair would constitute an >agenda,. r

[IFWP] Re: [ga] Re: Another DNSO web page lacuna

On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Kent Crispin wrote: > You forgot me -- I supported those rules. You forgot my good friend > William Walsh ;-). In fact, you have forgotten a great many people. I'm very glad you have identified yourself as a Walsh friend - the information adds to your credibility. Rega

Re: [IFWP] IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root

so, > it may be time for some additional members for purposes of accuracy, > don't you think? >;) > > !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > > > Looks like the IAB is a bit nervose these days. > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Dra

[IFWP] Re: [ga] DNSO.ORG has melted down?

How nice .. a positive PCCF reply - not that it matters. And now I shall respond. On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote: > This week has been most interesting. First the cracker-kiddies start capping > some of the largest pipes on the Internet (which scares the bejeezus out of > me), th

[IFWP] IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root

Looks like the IAB is a bit nervose these days. A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Internet Architecture Board Working Group of the IETF. Title : IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root

Re: [IFWP] RE: IAEA antispam domain block

elaborate > or discuss Kent on prejudicial grounds. >;) I felt this was only > fair. I did send them a "Collection" of DNSO E-Mails going back > months on both Kent and Roberto per their request. > > !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > > > Today - our Mr. Gaetano has

[IFWP] RE: IAEA antispam domain block

Today - our Mr. Gaetano has been busy cutting and pasting denials to hundreds of people. Good bless Mr. Gato and all who would sail in her. On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote: > > I would like to point out a couple of things, and make a suggestion. > > First of all, there's no invest

[IFWP] Re: [ga] Message from the Chair - List Rules

On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote: > Hi, Ellen. > > Sorry to reply this late, but your message has been buried in hundreds > of private messages by Joe Baptista, and I did not read it until some > cleanup has been done. I object to you using my name for damage control. Regards Joe

[IFWP] Re: [ga] Exclusion of Jeff Williams for 2 weeks

just send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and in the body of the message type unsubscribe ga. You see Harald, building consensus is going to be difficult so close to cairo. And why are we seeing so many old messages. How many messages has elizabeth been sitting on. On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Mikki Bar

[IFWP] Re: [ga] it's time to kick the GATO

I've noticed that the GA DNSO listadmin is posting old messages to the ga list. Is this a lame attempt at generating traffic ;-) or just another mistake. On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > > I have decided that it is time to kick our chair where it hurts > most.

Re: [IFWP] it's spooky over at the GA

ristian and family values oriented isp's a safe internet. However, as we discussed, it would be a time consumming proposal. Regards Joe Baptista > > !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > > > Since Harald and Roberto rammed those new rules on the GA, split the lists > > into

[IFWP] Re: TechInformer | Who do you trust? Apple, sysadmins & 'the Man'vie for power

On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, www.IDG.net wrote: > WHO'S CONTROLLING CYBERSPACE? > (Source: Computerworld) A Harvard law professor's new book warns that the Internet is losing its independence to commercial interests. > http://www.techinformer.com/go.cgi?id=223744 More nonsense from Lessig or ICAN

[IFWP] it's spooky over at the GA

Since Harald and Roberto rammed those new rules on the GA, split the lists into full and rules, and ostrazized some of the key people - it's been really dead over there. The IFWP on the other hand is booming. Maybe it's time to start discussing issues of substance. Like what do we do as the ro

Re: [IFWP] Key quotes and ideas from ICANN membership roundtable

On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Karl Auerbach wrote: > Regulation of the Internet is both legitimate and proper. The question is > by whom, over what, what the regulations shall be, and what processes are > used to apply them. No - that is a very incorrect assumption. Regulation of the internet is unna

[IFWP] [Random-bits] healthnet.org domain dispute (fwd)

-- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 11:04:04 -0500 From: James Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Multiple recipients of list RANDOM-BITS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Random-bits] healthnet.org domain dispute These are URLs to stories about the dispute between Satellit

[IFWP] Re: Re: Update on ICANN Cairo Meetings

On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D. wrote: > I believe that Mr. Walsh should be prepared to support his allegation > against vrx.net and its customers, or else do the honorable thing and admit > that he has no idea what he is talking about here. I think everyone knows Walsh is a bit

[IFWP] RE: ben - fix the real server - it's flacking again

All the real audio links on the following page do not work. http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/dnso/ Does that help you out Ben? If you have any further problems with this myopic view of your network - please advise. Regards Joe On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > More det

[IFWP] RE: ben - fix the real server - it's flacking again

More detail - it's don't work. regards joe On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Ben Edelman wrote: > This is the first report I've had recently of any problems with it. Can you > provide more details about the problems you're currently experiencing? > > > Ben Edelman > Berkman Center for Internet and Society

[IFWP] Re: Update on ICANN Cairo Meetings

On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Kent Crispin wrote: > It is a fact that when iciiu.org first appeared on the air its name > service was provided by vrx.net -- that was publicly acknowledged by > Richard Sexton on some list or another, and probably appears in some > public archive. iciiu.org is no longer s

[IFWP] Harvard's Lessig lays more eggs.

WHO'S CONTROLLING CYBERSPACE? http://www.pcworld.com/cgi-bin/pcwtoday?ID=15153 Harvard law professor says commercialism will stifle the Net.

[IFWP] CauseNET: Webcast of ICANN Roundtable

CauseNET The Common Cause Email Alert Network http://www.commoncause.org Monday, February 7, 2000 - - Webcast of ICANN Roundtable - - The Internet community is on the brink of holding a first-of-its-kind global election. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) will soo

[IFWP] AW: IAEA antispam email block (fwd)

censored disclosure -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 08:53:44 +0100 From: censored To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: AW: IAEA antispam email block Dear Mr. Baptista, thank you for your information. My email address has been blocked from one day

[IFWP] Re: Finally got slightly caught up....INEGroup.com opens

William - could you just shut up. Your the only person I know who replies to his own propaganda in order to generate more propaganda. Go to your room. On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, William X. Walsh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On 06-Feb-2000 William X. Walsh wrote: >

[IFWP] Re: ICANN's GA list closed for the weekend

Actually - they just split the list into a list with rules (GA Rules) and a list without rules (GA Full). It's a bit of a mellon move if you ask me. Please excuse me if I cc this out of the list, I feel I have to share the info. I normally don't share my tidbits outside fools with the masses of

[IFWP] ICANN's GA list closed for the weekend

It looks as if Elizabeth the DNSO list admins has closed the GA list. I anticipate this is a temporary anomyly, but we shall see.

[IFWP] Consensus building in the GA - mass resignations

Yesturday the General Assembly of the DNSO of ICANN was witness to a mass exodus of support with the resignations of Karl Auerbach, Mikki Barry, Milton Mueller, Davis Steele, Christopher Ambler, and Ellen Rony. I would like to recognize these actions as a confirmation of the effective leadership

[IFWP] Re: [ga] Year of the Dragon

You know Roberto - this is something nice that you do. The holiday trip. Why don't you resign as our chair and instead we'll appoint you as our official GA Holiday Clock. I think you would be a much happier puppy if we did that. And by the way Roberto, have you heard - a bunch of people just

Re: [IFWP] .EU (& European Union threats?)

Yes there is truth to the statement. The European Commission - or more specifically the Information Society Directorate-General of the EU has made it very clear to ICANN that they either get .eu listed or else it's bye bye USG root servers. You might want to find the EU contact for this a Mr. P

Re: [IFWP] CORE (court case)

On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Joseph Friedman wrote: > Is there a court case against CORE? Does anyone know what iti s related > to? Image Online Design, Inc. v. CORE Association and the Solicitors for Image Online are Christie Parker & Dale http://cph.com/ and the solicitor for CORE are the same as w

[IFWP] BIND 1999 Survey sponsor dies Jan 25, 2000

Mr. Francis Fanego the lead sponsor of the BIND 1999 Survey passed away this January 25th, 2000 at 9 AM. He will be missed dearly by his wife, mother and friends.

[IFWP] Re: EU ends Network Solutions Probe

> Newsbytes is reporting on it. Here is an affiliate site carrying the story. > > http://www.32bitsonline.com/news.php3?news=news/21/nb21316&page=1 I anticipate ICANN and the EU have made a deal on the .eu tld after EU treatened to start their own root servers.

[IFWP] new tld's

On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, William X. Walsh wrote: > Diversity in business models would add a new element and finally bring REAL > competition to the domain industry. You must be busy watching motivational videos "Diversity in business models"? Nice buzzwords but it helps to understand what it means

[IFWP] Re: CORE Out of Business??

On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, domainiac wrote: > >for those of your who wish to rely on the "insight ??" > > then why don't you provide your insight? He can't. If he were to reply to the original question, he would have to either lie that everything is rosy - or alternatively tell the truth and confir

[IFWP] Re: Re: CORE Out of Business??

"SHORT THE TECHNOLOGY STOCKS (ESPECIALLY QUALCOMM AND CISCO) THE DOW JONES > WILL FALL BELOW 6000 BY DECEMBER 31, 1999" never published anything like that either. Regards Joe > > > > - Original Message - > From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

<    1   2   3   4   5   >