Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 11:47:17 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The final official press release on new ICANN/NSI/DOC deal
Cc:
Bcc:
X-Attachments:
ICANN, U.S. Department of Commerce, and Network Solutions, Inc., Announce
Tentative Agreements
on Future
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1904 05:51:29 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ICANN and IBM
Cc:
Bcc:
X-Attachments:
[please note this is from John Patrick from IBM not me (some IPers
assume everything they read comes from me :-) djf]
Dave, recently there has been
[ David Johnson is a partner in the Washington, D.C. firm of Wilmer, Cutler
and Pickering.
He represents NSI but has been involved in the ICANN debate for some time in
various capacities and offers this only as his personal opinion. djf]
From: "Johnson, David" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T
[Richard J. Solomon is the Chief Scientist of the UPenn Center for
Communications Technology and Policy and the co-author with Lee
McKnight and Russell Neuman of The Gordian Knot: Gridlock on the
Information Highway (MIT Press, 1997)
Would the U.S. Government regulate the Internet? And how
Business Group Sets Internet Proposals
By Neal Boudette, European Telecommunications Correspondent
PARIS (Reuters) - An industry group backed by some of the world's heaviest
hitting executives will unveil a set of proposals on regulating the Internet
Monday, all in the hope of making it
Gordon,
My only comment is I wish the "unindicted conspirators" were as
devious and organized as you claim. My experience is that they were
not and still are not. I just don't believe that the ICANN Board (nor
did the ITAG or the ISOC Board) meets in private to plot the takeover
of the
y shoot up
everything. (most of the time the money they may cause to get
contributed is secondary to this careful spade work)
dave
At 12:01 PM -0700 9/10/99, Frank Rizzo wrote:
At 2:50 PM -0400 9/10/99, David Farber wrote:
I have a lot of unhappiness as to how ICANN is evolving but I just
can
Many thanks, yes yes yes
At 2:20 PM -0700 9/10/99, Greg Skinner wrote:
It strikes me that Farber is not so much defending ICANN (as it currently
exists) as he is defending *the process* by which there can be Internet
self-governance. If ICANN (as it currently exists) falls, the process may
fall
Gordon,
I will try to outline such a set of concrete scenarios. It will take
some time. I have no staff, it is the beginning of our term and I
will take what time is necessary to do a good job. So don't expect it
this week but I will do it soon.
Dave
At 3:27 PM -0400 9/10/99, Gordon Cook
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 10:09:02 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP: ICANN and what it is
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Esther Dyson)
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 09:18:26
10 matches
Mail list logo
