Members of the ICANN Board of Directors:
I join the others who are urging ICANN to defer any decisions regarding
implementation of the WIPO Final Report to the Domain Name Supporting
Organization when it is constituted.
This WIPO report is 107 pages, not including endnotes and annexes. It
conta
At 10:05 AM 5/7/99 , Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>People are *horrified* with the WIPO report and no compromise can
>include such onerous provisions and if you want ICANN to fail
>immediately then endorse the WIPO plan by all means.
Hi Richard (aka McGyver :-)
ICANN is a lost cause. I say, let
th
Esther, Mike and all
ATTENTION ESTHER DYSON!
ATTENTION ESTHER DYSON!
ATTENTION MIKE ROBERTS!
ATTENTION MIKE ROBERTS!
We at the [INEGroup] would also yet again request that YOU, Esther
Dyson and/or Mike Roberts answer the questions that have been
put to you directly please!! As a servent of t
Title: RE: [IFWP] ICANN and WIPO in Berlin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Esther,
I am also curious as to your response. These are important issues for
all of us.
Thanks!
Gene Marsh
anycastNET Incorporated
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Gre
On Fri, 7 May 1999, Esther Dyson wrote:
> Thanks for your comments. AS noted, we have not yet decided what we will
> do. It indeed depends on public comments, among other things. But aside from
> our process, do you have any comments on the substance of the WIPO report?
> We would welcome those.
Mikki and all,
We [INEGroup] completely concur with MIkki's comments here as
I indicated yesterday. We are still in detailed review of the WIPO RFC-3
"Final Report" currently and have no completed that in depth review
process. It is my understanding that the EU council is also still
in review
Without commenting on the proposed 'exclusionary" practice itself, I note
that Mr. Oppedahl impliedly misstates the standard for being a famous mark.
It is not "coined and unique." Non-coined marks which are famous include
JOHNNIE WALKER, CADILLAC and NIKE.
Demonstrably unique (or more to the
At 07:26 AM 5/7/99 -0400, Esther Dyson wrote:
>Thanks for your comments. AS noted, we have not yet decided what we will
>do. It indeed depends on public comments, among other things. But aside from
>our process, do you have any comments on the substance of the WIPO report?
>We would welcome those
>I echo Bret's concerns and agree with his suggested course of action.
>There is
>no urgency to take this action.
I completely agree. It would take longer than the timeframe allocated to
even provide coherrent comments on a report as dense and as far reaching as
this one. There is definitely no
At 05:26 AM 5/7/99 , Esther Dyson wrote:
>Thanks for your comments. AS noted, we have not yet decided what we will
>do. It indeed depends on public comments, among other things. But aside from
>our process, do you have any comments on the substance of the WIPO report?
>We would welcome those.
>
I echo Bret's concerns and agree with his suggested course of action. There is
no urgency to take this action.
> Esther Dyson wrote:
>
> >Thanks for your comments. AS noted, we have not yet decided what we will
> >do. It indeed depends on public comments, among other things. But aside from
>
Esther Dyson wrote:
>Thanks for your comments. AS noted, we have not yet decided what we will
>do. It indeed depends on public comments, among other things. But aside from
>our process, do you have any comments on the substance of the WIPO report?
>We would welcome those.
>
>Esther
Yes, ICANN h
Thanks for your comments. AS noted, we have not yet decided what we will
do. It indeed depends on public comments, among other things. But aside from
our process, do you have any comments on the substance of the WIPO report?
We would welcome those.
Esther
At 11:53 AM 06/05/99 -0400, Bret A. Fau
Bret and all,
Bret A. Fausett wrote:
> The latest agenda items for the Berlin ICANN meeting
> (http://www.icann.org/berlin/berlin-details.html) suggest that "[t]he
> ICANN Board of Directors will meet to discuss and vote on any pending
> resolutions with regard to...WIPO Final Report, including
]
Subject: [IFWP] ICANN and WIPO in Berlin
The latest agenda items for the Berlin ICANN meeting
(http://www.icann.org/berlin/berlin-details.html) suggest that "[t]he
ICANN Board of Directors will meet to discuss and vote on any pending
resolutions with regard to...WIPO Final Report, incl
The latest agenda items for the Berlin ICANN meeting
(http://www.icann.org/berlin/berlin-details.html) suggest that "[t]he
ICANN Board of Directors will meet to discuss and vote on any pending
resolutions with regard to...WIPO Final Report, including annexes." ICANN
has invited public comment
16 matches
Mail list logo
