There you go.
>[ABOVE 18]
>
>ICANN Fucked-up the White Paper
>
>On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, at 15:26 [=GMT+0100], BrandonButterworth wrote:
>
>> > Who supports Ellen's call for a new IFWP acronym meaning?
>>
>> Unhappy with some situation on the net that you can't
>> influence? Internet Forum for Whiney
At 9/9/01 10:21 AM, you wrote:
> > FWIW, I got a verbal summary online at:
> > http://www.iperdome.com/images/iperdome1.ra
>
>This was most interesting to listen to. Hopefully you do not hold it
>against me, if I do not put it up at www.ifwp.org. Despite all the
>historical details, it is very mu
[ABOVE 18]
ICANN Fucked-up the White Paper
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, at 15:26 [=GMT+0100], BrandonButterworth wrote:
> > Who supports Ellen's call for a new IFWP acronym meaning?
>
> Unhappy with some situation on the net that you can't
> influence? Internet Forum for Whiney People is for you.
>
>
> Who supports Ellen's call for a new IFWP acronym meaning?
Unhappy with some situation on the net that you can't
influence? Internet Forum for Whiney People is for you.
Obviously :)
brandon
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, at 11:40 [=GMT-0400], Jay Fenello wrote:
Hi Jay,
> Good job snagging IFWP.org.
Monkey/keyboard thing.
> It needs to be preserved as part of the
> historical record. Is there any way to
> get the old web pages back on line?
A lot is on Ellen Rony's domainhandbook.com, to w
Internet Forum Without Prejudice?
Marc
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, at 23:32 [=GMT-0700], Ellen Rony wrote:
> >Using "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" for wider discussion would be valuable.
> >Who supports Ellen's call for a new IFWP acronym meaning?
> >First draft: Internet Forum on World Pxcsomethingorother?
> >-k
>Using "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" for wider discussion would be valuable.
>Who supports Ellen's call for a new IFWP acronym meaning?
>First draft: Internet Forum on World Pxcsomethingorother?
>-ken
Independent Forum on Web Protocols?
Icky Food on White Plates?
^^
Using "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" for wider discussion would be valuable.
Who supports Ellen's call for a new IFWP acronym meaning?
First draft: Internet Forum on World Pxcsomethingorother?
-ken
>There are plans, now the domain IFWP.ORG is working again, to revive
>the ifwp.org mailing list. More to fol
Marc Schneiders wrote:
>
> There are plans, now the domain IFWP.ORG is working again, to revive
> the ifwp.org mailing list.
Fine with me, but how about keeping Crocker and Crispin off it this
time?
M.S.
Ok, here's a trivia question for the DNS community.
Who remembers the meaning of the acronym GIAW?*
Notes about it are still online at http://www.domainhandbook.com/giaw.html
Other links to IFWP related documents are at
http://www.domainhandbook.com/ifwp.html although I confess I haven't
checked
Hi Marc,
Good job snagging IFWP.org.
It needs to be preserved as part of the
historical record. Is there any way to
get the old web pages back on line?
Either that, or a new summary of the IFWP
would be great -- something that newcomers
could read and immediately understand how
the IFWP was
There are plans, now the domain IFWP.ORG is working again, to revive
the ifwp.org mailing list. More to follow soon. The idea is to let it
be a replacement for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] (earlier
@internic.net) list, that, eh, mmm, let's say, died.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
12 matches
Mail list logo
