On 09-Jan-99 Michael Sondow wrote:
> You're not worth arguing with, William Walsh. You're a poor human being with
> no honesty, no morals, no common sense, nothing but your own greed and
> jealosy of others. I'm amazed that you dare show your face on these lists
> after having been exposed for yo
Roeland M.J. Meyer a écrit:
>
> At 04:17 PM 1/9/99 -0500, Michael Sondow wrote:
> >Mikki Barry a écrit:
> >
> >> >mindless sniping about open vs closed meetings/lists
> >> >seems absolutely entrenched. I just thought I would join in on the
> >> >fun.
> >>
> >> It's not fun IMHO. I'd really like
At 04:17 PM 1/9/99 -0500, Michael Sondow wrote:
>Mikki Barry a écrit:
>
>> >mindless sniping about open vs closed meetings/lists
>> >seems absolutely entrenched. I just thought I would join in on the
>> >fun.
>>
>> It's not fun IMHO. I'd really like to get on with getting some work done.
>
>Yes
Mikki Barry a écrit:
> >mindless sniping about open vs closed meetings/lists
> >seems absolutely entrenched. I just thought I would join in on the
> >fun.
>
> It's not fun IMHO. I'd really like to get on with getting some work done.
Yes, some work is good. But tell us, Mikki, on the 21st of J
At 07:22 AM 1/9/99 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 09:02:17AM -0500, Mikki Barry wrote:
>> any possible way we can stop the sniping and maybe start being more
>> productive?
>
>I doubt it -- mindless sniping about open vs closed meetings/lists
>seems absolutely entrenched. I
At 11:11 AM 1/9/99 -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>At 07:37 AM 1/9/99 -0500, Michael Sondow wrote:
>>Richard J. Sexton a écrit:
>>You've agreed to attend a closed meeting, knowing full well that people were
>>being excluded. Now, when attacked, you claim to be doing it in the public
>>interest. T
Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> At 07:37 AM 1/9/99 -0500, Michael Sondow wrote:
> >Richard J. Sexton a écrit:
> >>
> >> At 02:09 AM 1/9/99 -0500, Michael Sondow wrote:
> >> >That meeting you're going to is the real meeting, from which the opposition
> >> >is being excluded. The one the next day is t
At 07:22 AM 1/9/99 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:
>
>It is sadly true that people have fixated on the issue of "closed" vs
>"open" meetings/lists, and it has become a mantra for mindless
>criticism of people whose position you don't agree with. But the
>fact is that meetings and lists have many purpo
At 07:32 AM 1/9/99 -0500, you wrote:
>Richard J. Sexton a écrit:
>
>> You should apologize.
>
>I should apologize to William Walsh, after the way he attacks every message
>I send regardless of what it says, just because he's afraid of the
>"customers" having any say in the Internet "business"?
>
>On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 09:02:17AM -0500, Mikki Barry wrote:
>> >> I agree the foul stencg of secret deals from IAHC
>> >> days still lingers, but you're on a witch hunt Kent.
>> >
>> >Something you should be very familiar with, I must admit.
>>
>> So much for working together for the common good
On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 09:02:17AM -0500, Mikki Barry wrote:
> >> I agree the foul stencg of secret deals from IAHC
> >> days still lingers, but you're on a witch hunt Kent.
> >
> >Something you should be very familiar with, I must admit.
>
> So much for working together for the common good of th
>On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 01:18:01AM -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>> Not form my observation.
>>
>> BWG was cc'd as a courtesy. Poepel simply kept the cc line.
>
>So you say.
And so says the editor of the draft.
>
>> Nothing gets decided on the BWG list.
>
>So you say.
>
>> I agree the foul ste
>It's obvious, however, from the continual "cc's" to the
>"bwg-n-friends" list in Mikki's messages that things were being
>decided on the closed bwg-n-friends list as far as the ORSC draft was
>concerned. Most of Mikki's draft just appeared on the ORSC list --
>the comments from the ORSC list are
Richard J. Sexton a écrit:
> You should apologize.
I should apologize to William Walsh, after the way he attacks every message
I send regardless of what it says, just because he's afraid of the
"customers" having any say in the Internet "business"?
Not likely.
At 12:41 AM 1/9/99 -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>I made a great batch of chili tonight.
I broke out the wok and made some Indonesian fried rice (nasi goreng) with
lottsa sambal (chili sauce to y'all, my eyes are still watering ).
___
Roeland M.
At 11:45 PM 1/8/99 -0800, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
>At 12:41 AM 1/9/99 -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>
>>I made a great batch of chili tonight.
>
>I broke out the wok and made some Indonesian fried rice (nasi goreng) with
>lottsa sambal (chili sauce to y'all, my eyes are still watering ).
HEY
At 02:36 AM 1/9/99 -0500, Marc Hurst wrote:
>
>
>On Sat, 9 Jan 1999, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>
>> Isn't this going a bit too far ?
>>
>> Last night I met with Jay Fenello. Nobody was told,
>> nobody could show up unless they stumbled across us.
>> Secret. Closed. Evil.
>
>Wow...
>
>Tressa? Richa
At 02:15 AM 1/9/99 -0500, Michael Sondow wrote:
>You're not worth arguing with, William Walsh. You're a poor human being with
>no honesty, no morals, no common sense, nothing but your own greed and
>jealosy of others. I'm amazed that you dare show your face on these lists
>after having been expose
At 02:15 AM 1/9/99 -0500, Michael Sondow wrote:
>You're not worth arguing with, William Walsh. You're a poor human being with
>no honesty, no morals, no common sense, nothing but your own greed and
>jealosy of others. I'm amazed that you dare show your face on these lists
>after having been expose
At 10:08 PM 1/8/99 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 12:41:33AM -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>It's obvious, however, from the continual "cc's" to the
>"bwg-n-friends" list in Mikki's messages that things were being
>decided on the closed bwg-n-friends list as far as the ORSC
You're not worth arguing with, William Walsh. You're a poor human being with
no honesty, no morals, no common sense, nothing but your own greed and
jealosy of others. I'm amazed that you dare show your face on these lists
after having been exposed for your fraud and double-dealings with .tjn, but
On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 01:18:01AM -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> Not form my observation.
>
> BWG was cc'd as a courtesy. Poepel simply kept the cc line.
So you say.
> Nothing gets decided on the BWG list.
So you say.
> I agree the foul stencg of secret deals from IAHC
> days still linger
Not form my observation.
BWG was cc'd as a courtesy. Poepel simply kept the cc line.
Nothing gets decided on the BWG list. How could it? What
meaning or significance could it have.
I agree the foul stencg of secret deals from IAHC
days still lingers, but you're on a witch hunt Kent.
At 10:08
On 09-Jan-99 Kent Crispin wrote:
>
> It's obvious, however, from the continual "cc's" to the
> "bwg-n-friends" list in Mikki's messages that things were being
> decided on the closed bwg-n-friends list as far as the ORSC draft was
> concerned. Most of Mikki's draft just appeared on the ORSC lis
On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 12:41:33AM -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> Isn't this going a bit too far ?
>
> Last night I met with Jay Fenello. Nobody was told,
> nobody could show up unless they stumbled across us.
> Secret. Closed. Evil.
>
> But this happens. Poeple do meet without wanitng the
>
>I made a great batch of chili tonight.
I worked late, and ate my dinner cold, when I got home.
On the other hand, my wife just took warm brownies out
of the oven. I'll eat some now, in a closed meeting.
Christopher
__
To receive the digest vers
26 matches
Mail list logo
