Milton Mueller wrote,
Bret:
There is only one thing the DNSO will do that is of any
significance. That is
to elect three members of the ICANN board.
Unfortunately, I am beginning to agree with Milton about this. With the
publication of the registrar guidelines, it seems that the ICANN
Antony Van Couvering wrote:
If that is not the model, however, and the DNSO is structured such that its
decisions really can be said to represent the consensus of the whole DNSO,
then the DNSO can do one other thing besides electing ICANN Board members --
it can refuse to support ICANN
On Sun, Feb 14, 1999 at 10:59:00AM -0500, Bret Fausett wrote:
My original post asked about whether there was really a need for giving
executive power to the Names Council, even if just to act in an
"emergency" capacity. Kent's re-threaded response ("Timely decision") not
only answered a
At 2/14/99, 01:34 PM, Kent Crispin wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 1999 at 10:59:00AM -0500, Bret Fausett wrote:
In fact, these examples
illustrate quite clearly the concern that many have with the dnso.org-BMW
draft: it gives too much power to the Names Council to act in the way
Kent suggests.
On Sun, Feb 14, 1999 at 03:03:28PM -0500, Jay Fenello wrote:
Kent,
You are absolutely CORRECT
The clauses you refer to REQUIRE THE NC TO CONSULT WITH THE
Consult yes, listen to **NO**!
MEMBERSHIP AND THE CONSTITUENCIES, unless there TRULY is no time.
Membership yes,
I note the following interesting inconsistency in the Paris Model --
it makes an assumption of competence on the part of the membership,
in the sense that the membership is considered capable of developing
policy. At the same time it assumes that the membership is not
competent to elect
Bret and all,
Bret A. Fausett wrote:
My original post asked about whether there was really
a need for giving
executive power to the Names Council, even if just to act in an
"emergency" capacity. Kent's re-threaded response ("Timely decision")
not
only answered a different question (i.e. the need
Bret:
There is only one thing the DNSO will do that is of any significance. That is
to elect three members of the ICANN board. ICANN, particularly in its current
composition, has no need and no incentive to ask the DNSO for "advice and
recommendations...on an expedited or emergency basis." ICANN
