Michael and all,
Michael, William is confused. Nothing unusual there. It is likely that he
forgot to take his medication again...
Michael Sondow wrote:
> William X. Walsh a écrit:
> >
> > Michael, your lack of understanding how the law operates never ceases
> > to amaze me.
> >
> > Anyone s
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999 05:34:14 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William X. Walsh)
wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Apr 1999 01:30:29 -0400, Michael Sondow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>William X. Walsh a écrit:
>>>
>>> Michael, your lack of understanding how the law operates never ceases
>>> to amaze me.
>>>
>>> Anyo
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999 01:30:29 -0400, Michael Sondow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>William X. Walsh a écrit:
>>
>> Michael, your lack of understanding how the law operates never ceases
>> to amaze me.
>>
>> Anyone suing will sue in the court that has the best jurisdiction for
>> them, and ICANN is
William X. Walsh a écrit:
>
> Michael, your lack of understanding how the law operates never ceases
> to amaze me.
>
> Anyone suing will sue in the court that has the best jurisdiction for
> them, and ICANN is most certainly subject to California Law. If the
> likelyhood of winning is in State
Michael, your lack of understanding how the law operates never ceases
to amaze me.
Anyone suing will sue in the court that has the best jurisdiction for
them, and ICANN is most certainly subject to California Law. If the
likelyhood of winning is in State court, they most certainly would
file th
Jonathan Weinberg a écrit:
> The relationship between a California nonprofit corporation and its
> members is governed in the first instance by the California Nonprofit
> Corporation Law. Whether you (or I) think the law is well-written doesn't
> much matter, and the notion that it would
Roeland M.J. Meyer a écrit:
> You have just hit upon one of the many reasons that I have argued against a
>California home for what is now the ICANN. Delaware is a much better place for these,
>or most, things corporate. The ICANN BoD, or course, chooses not to listen to good
>sense.
Don't ki
Michael Sondow
Sent: Monday, April 12, 1999 11:46 AM
To: Jonathan Weinberg
Cc: Izumi AIZU; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ICANN MAC list
Subject: Re: [Membership] Re: : [IFWP] COMMENTS ON M.A.C.RECOMMENDATIONS
of MARCH 18
Jonathan Weinberg a écrit:
> This assertion is completely mystifying. Can you cite
Jonathan Weinberg a écrit:
> This assertion is completely mystifying. Can you cite any legal
> basis for it?
I have been researching these questions in federal district and
appeals court cases and, while I have not had time to complete my
study, not by a long shot, I have already found some r
