> Also disturbing is this comment from Esther Dyson's letter to Becky Burr:
>
> This Board personifies effective
> consensus decision-making, and many of its members feel that losing the
> ability to discuss matters in decisional meetings in private will adversely
> affect the candor of those di
>Monday, July 19, 1999, 7:25:21 PM, Patrick Greenwell
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Bill Lovell wrote:
>>> Wow! Sounds like [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there consensus here?
>>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
>> All kidding aside, Tony raises an extremely valid point: Where is all this
>> "co
"William X. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Come on now Patrick, you know that they mean consensus from the CORE,
> ISOC, and Trademark interests.
Indeed. As others have pointed out, users, small business owners,
independent domain owners (holders), etc. have been left out thus
far.
--greg
Monday, July 19, 1999, 7:25:21 PM, Patrick Greenwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Bill Lovell wrote:
>> Wow! Sounds like [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there consensus here?
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
> All kidding aside, Tony raises an extremely valid point: Where is all this
> "consensus"
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:
> Monday, July 19, 1999, 7:25:21 PM, Patrick Greenwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Bill Lovell wrote:
> >> Wow! Sounds like [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there consensus here?
> >> HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
> > All kidding aside, Tony rai
