"William X. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Come on now Patrick, you know that they mean consensus from the CORE, > ISOC, and Trademark interests. Indeed. As others have pointed out, users, small business owners, independent domain owners (holders), etc. have been left out thus far. --gregbo
- [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community" - Fact and... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community" -... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community" -... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&quo... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&quo... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&quo... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&quo... Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&quo... Gene Marsh
- Re[2]: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Commun... Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&quo... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&quo... Jeff Williams
- Re[2]: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&... Ellen Rony
- Re: Re[2]: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Commun... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&quo... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&quo... Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&quo... Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&quo... Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&quo... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community&quo... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's "Internet Community" -... Greg Skinner
