Re: Re[4]: [IFWP] Re: INEGroup membership issues.....

1999-08-26 Thread Planet Communications Computing Facility
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Bill Lovell wrote: > At 11:29 PM 8/25/99 -0400, you wrote: > > Is this whole Planet Communicatios obssession with Jeff Williams and > William Walsh a denial of service spam, or is it some new and even > more creative way iby which JW keeps the pot boiling? No matter: I w

Re: Re[4]: [IFWP] Re: INEGroup membership issues.....

1999-08-26 Thread Planet Communications Computing Facility
Regards Jeff Mason -- Planet Communication & Computing Facility [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public Access Internet Research Publisher 1 (212) 894-3704 ext. 1033 On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Bill Lovell wrote: > At 11:29 PM 8/25/99 -0400, you wrote: > > Is this whole Planet Communicatios o

Re: Re[4]: [IFWP] Re: INEGroup membership issues.....

1999-08-26 Thread Bill Lovell
At 11:29 PM 8/25/99 -0400, you wrote: Is this whole Planet Communicatios obssession with Jeff Williams and William Walsh a denial of service spam, or is it some new and even more creative way iby which JW keeps the pot boiling? No matter: I won't be hearing from Planet Communications any more

Re: Re[4]: [IFWP] Re: INEGroup membership issues.....

1999-08-25 Thread Richard J. Sexton
>Look William. A skinner reaction is normal. Alot of people have them, That's Pavlov, not Skinner. -- This program posts news to thousands of machines throughout the entire civilized world. Your message will cost the net hundreds if not thousands of dollars to send everywhere. Please be s

Re: Re[4]: [IFWP] Re: INEGroup membership issues.....

1999-08-25 Thread Planet Communications Computing Facility
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, William X. Walsh wrote: > No where in my messages did I say I would not be reading or responding > to your posts. I simply pointed out that your messages DIRECTLY to me > would bounce, unread. And that your list messages would be filtered > to a seperate lower priority fol

Re[4]: [IFWP] Re: INEGroup membership issues.....

1999-08-25 Thread William X. Walsh
Wednesday, August 25, 1999, 8:17:50 PM, Planet Communications Computing Facility <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, William X. Walsh wrote: >> > I don't think you should be making assumptions. But is it really that >> > relevant anyway. Not really - let's just try to all behav

Re: Re[4]: [IFWP] Re: INEGroup membership issues.....

1999-08-25 Thread Planet Communications Computing Facility
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Mark C. Langston wrote: > > On 25 August 1999, Planet Communications Computing Facility ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Look William. A skinner reaction is normal. Alot of people have them, > >conditioning starts at birth. It's either that or your a fag like my > >ol'

Re: Re[4]: [IFWP] Re: INEGroup membership issues.....

1999-08-25 Thread Mark C. Langston
On 25 August 1999, Planet Communications Computing Facility <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Look William. A skinner reaction is normal. Alot of people have them, >conditioning starts at birth. It's either that or your a fag like my >ol'uncle walt. He says it's a fag's business to be a busy body

Re: Re[4]: [IFWP] Re: INEGroup membership issues.....

1999-08-25 Thread Planet Communications Computing Facility
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, William X. Walsh wrote: > Wednesday, August 25, 1999, 6:40:30 PM, Planet Communications Computing Facility ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, William X. Walsh wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> To what cause, Jeff? To obstruct the process by disruption? > >>

Re[4]: [IFWP] Re: INEGroup membership issues.....

1999-08-25 Thread William X. Walsh
Wednesday, August 25, 1999, 6:40:30 PM, Planet Communications Computing Facility <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, William X. Walsh wrote: >> >> >> >> To what cause, Jeff? To obstruct the process by disruption? >> >> > No - the bigger picture - he has the right to belong. >>