I'm suffering in my efforts to install 2.1.5 onto my box, so can I change the
box?
A proven hardware platform, available in the UK with at least 6 physical
network ports, I can probably justify buying.
Suggestions anyone?
We’ve used these:
Hi Chris
I'm trying to use a http://www.mini-itx.com/store/~FX5624 which I think is
the same box as your first link, if you can install onto here easily and
frequently then it must be me doing something wrong, aaagh
Nick Upson, Telensa Ltd, Senior Operations Network Engineer
direct +44 (0) 1799
I'm trying to use a http://www.mini-itx.com/store/~FX5624 which I think is
the same box as your first link, if you can install onto here easily and
frequently then it must be me doing something wrong, aaagh
Certainly looks like the same unit. Are you trying to install onto a CF card
(those
I'm trying to do a full install onto HDD, but I never get that far, I have
been unable to get the box to boot pfsense from stick or cd so that I can
install onto the HDD
I did try a CF card, that started to boot but immediatley hung
I thought there was a very large restriction in packages using
I thought there was a very large restriction in packages using CF compared to
HDD, is that not the case (I'm coming from 1.2.3 so this might have changed)
That may well be true - I must confess I’m of the school of thought that a
firewall/router should do firewalling and routing, and not a
Lots of suggestions on the hardware, but I see nobody mention anything
based around the new and much more powerful Avoton platform. The
platform is officially supported, and the pfSense store has hardware
based on it (looks to be the Supermicro 5018A-FTN4,
The Supermicro 5018A-FTN4 server
my aim in using the CF card was to see if there was any functionality I
need missing
I run a mixed environment but I don't have a unix machine with a CF drive
Nick Upson, Telensa Ltd, Senior Operations Network Engineer
direct +44 (0) 1799 533252, support hotline +44 (0) 1799 399200
On 23
On Oct 23, 2014, at 5:18 AM, Zia Nayamuth zedestruc...@gmail.com wrote:
Lots of suggestions on the hardware, but I see nobody mention anything based
around the new and much more powerful Avoton platform. The platform is
officially supported, and the pfSense store has hardware based on it
One nit: yes, I can sell something called pfSense, as that's the
freely-downloadable software under a (IIRC) BSD license.
I can't sell something called NetGate.
I can't produce a derivative work and call it pfSense. (This is a gray area,
admittedly.)
But, at least here, I'm quite sure I can
Adam,
(Three people rushed to my office, saying, “Here we go again!”)
There is a metaphor I like to use to explain the situation, it is roughly this:
Can you buy a bottle of Coca-Cola, and then sell or give it to someone
else?
Yes you can. Without getting too deep into the
On Oct 23, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote:
We don't release the tuning info, and, incredibly, a couple people a month
write in demanding it.
Does this mean there’s a special, hardware-specific version of pfSense (or a
package or ?) or is the tuning in the hardware
On 14-10-23 03:06 PM, Chris L wrote:
We don't release the tuning info, and, incredibly, a couple people a month
write in demanding it.
Does this mean there’s a special, hardware-specific version of pfSense (or a
package or ?) or is the tuning in the hardware itself?
AFAIK it's the same
Has there been any discussion or work on creating a Bro package for pfSense?
I did a bit of searching and came up with one forum post from 2010 discussing
it, but can’t find anything since then.
Bro seems to run well on FreeBSD and is able to be installed via pkg.
I have never attempted to
On Oct 23, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net wrote:
On 14-10-23 03:06 PM, Chris L wrote:
We don't release the tuning info, and, incredibly, a couple people a month
write in demanding it.
Does this mean there’s a special, hardware-specific version of pfSense (or a
On 14-10-23 04:29 PM, Chris L wrote:
I’m not asking what the changes are - I’m asking if these boxes require a
special version of pfSense for maximum performance.
I can't answer that with 100% certainty, but I believe the packaging is
tweaked slightly. Whether you call that a special version
On Oct 23, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net wrote:
On 14-10-23 04:29 PM, Chris L wrote:
I’m not asking what the changes are - I’m asking if these boxes require a
special version of pfSense for maximum performance.
I can't answer that with 100% certainty, but I believe
[Hmm... half of this doesn't need to be on-list. Sorry if I'm
polluting. -Adam]
On 14-10-23 05:57 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
I get that Jim rubs a lot of people the wrong way (myself included),
Darn, you’d think that sharing a last name would count for something...
Sorry, no. ;-)
Kind of in
On Oct 23, 2014, at 7:48 PM, Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net wrote:
[Hmm... half of this doesn't need to be on-list. Sorry if I'm polluting.
-Adam]
On 14-10-23 05:57 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
I get that Jim rubs a lot of people the wrong way (myself included),
Darn, you’d think
18 matches
Mail list logo
