Hi Espen - thanks for the response. It's becoming evident that I didn't include
enough information first up.
I'm not planning to run full tables, just default announcement from provider if
we can.
EDIT: I clicked save earlier not send. I've since found out that removing the
"" line using vic
So switching the CARP VIPs to IP Alias VIPs, in my config, does work (as I had
originally expected by the "all about VIPs" WiKi page) -- it just takes an hour
or so (in our case) for the up-stream equipment to "cache in" on those changes
... as was suggested by a couple of responders.
I've sent
I have a v2.2 64-bit config running on a Core2 Duo system. The config uses a
number of aliases (including aliases that include other aliases, etc.). Rules
are based upon the aliases (du-oh!).
PROBLEM: if I change the name of 1 of the IP aliases, the name of the
corresponding table doesn't cha
To do this, you will have to grab the sources for pfsense, then grab the
build tools, and then try building a custom version of pfSense using a
snapshot from https://www.freebsd.org/snapshots/ as the base OS rather than
FreeBSD 10.1 as the base OS.
You should also check if the person was suggestin
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:53 PM, WebDawg wrote:
> Where is this tracked. I remember I used to be able to install the next
> version of pfSense, can I still do this?
>
What you're saying you want to try is debugging, not a production solution.
pfSense 2.2 already runs the most recent released f
If you have Device polling enabled it will use the "idle" cycles to poll
the Ethernet devices for traffic instead of interrupts as I understand it.
Disable it and you should see a top
also a
top -Sa
on your console will show all process including the process that is hogging
the CPU
On Tue, Mar
I have an issue with the version of BSD used in pfSense and my hardware. I
was given the following advice to fix some hardware I use with pfSense and
I would like to try it:
Please try a snapshot of HEAD. It should try to allocate a PCI bus number
for
your second device which is currently failin
On 03/07/2015 04:32 PM, David Durrleman wrote:
> There seems to be an issue in pfsense's custom certificate depth
> verification for OpenVPN connections. When long certificate subjects are
> used, the validation fails. Here is how to repro:
Probably this (already fixed in 2.2.1):
https://redmine.p
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 2:32 PM, David Durrleman <
david.durrle...@shift-technology.com> wrote:
> [I am not subscribed to this list; please kindly copy me on any answer]
>
> Hi,
>
> I believe I have found a bug in pfsense. I am reporting it here per
> https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Bug_reporting
What process is consuming your CPU?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Guillaume JULLIEN
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since I upgraded my pfsenses to version 2.2, they more than often display
> 100% cpu load.
> I'm testing an installation on an Alix APU1D.
> no extra addon installed
> only one service def
Hi,
I’ve upgraded a virtual pfSense on an ESXi 5.5 installed on a HP Microserver
and have the same issue.
- Ingo
From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Guillaume
JULLIEN
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 2:52 PM
To: list@lists.pfsense.org
Subject: [pfSense] Pfsense 2.2
Hello,
Since I upgraded my pfsenses to version 2.2, they more than often
display 100% cpu load.
I'm testing an installation on an Alix APU1D.
no extra addon installed
only one service defined : DHCP
only my laptop connected on lan interface
If I plug WAN interface to my LAN CPU load can be 100%
[I am not subscribed to this list; please kindly copy me on any answer]
Hi,
I believe I have found a bug in pfsense. I am reporting it here per
https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Bug_reporting
Please let me know if this is the wrong channel.
There seems to be an issue in pfsense's custom certific
Are you going to load a full internet BGP routing table? Is that why you do
not want a default? Remember that even if you have a default route any
route that is more specific will take preference. I dont see the problem?
And if you want to prevent any unknown IP destination being routed to your
upl
Hi Mark - this is exactly what I'm seeing - and it would be fine if there were
a way to not set a static default.
Unfortunately, when unchecking the "Default gateway" box in the system> routing
menu, this selection isn't honoured.
Cheers,
Shannon
https://www.linkedin.com/in/shannongernyi
On 10/Mar/15 10:21, Shannon Gernyi wrote:
Hi Guys,
First time poster to the list - I've spent some time searching without
too much luck. Could be ambiguity in my search queries.
I'm putting out some new firewalls shortly, and like many already in
place, I'll be using openBGPd to interface
Hi Guys,
First time poster to the list - I've spent some time searching without too much
luck. Could be ambiguity in my search queries.
I'm putting out some new firewalls shortly, and like many already in place,
I'll be using openBGPd to interface with our provider.
I'd like to also make us
17 matches
Mail list logo
