Morning all..
Stupid(ish) question for you...
I have a PFSense box in the house with 3 internet connections (2x240/24 cable
modems and a 70ish/20mb VDSL line). I am wondering if i setup 3 OVPN
connections to a single (large) Cloud or Dedicated box, can I bundle the 3
connections into a singl
Hi,
I am trying to implement a GRE tunnel over 2 publc WAN addresses, unfortunalty i cannot find a guide /howto- for the same.
can someone please point me to a guide which i can replicate. thanks
rgds
Abid
Sent from my VEGA___
pfSense mailing list
ht
Would OpenVPN not be a better solution?
Any constraints limiting you to GRE?
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015, 6:09 AM Abid khan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to implement a GRE tunnel over 2 publc WAN addresses,
> unfortunalty i cannot find a guide /howto- for the same.
>
> can someone please point me to a
Performance and flexibility. OpenVPN is good at getting unicast IP traffic
from A to B, but it's difficult to, say, run OSPF over it. It also need
ridiculous amounts of CPU time to encrypt, especially painful in situations
that don't need encryption.
So, yeah, there are a LOT of use cases wher
Hello All:
I see the configuration script doesn't allow you to pick /32 address when
configuring an interface as my default gateway is not in the same subnet. I
have limited IPs and run pfsense from vmware. How can i override and assign
/32 ip address to wan interface.
I have done this in other l
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:42 AM, day knight wrote:
> I see the configuration script doesn't allow you to pick /32 address when
> configuring an interface as my default gateway is not in the same subnet. I
> have limited IPs and run pfsense from vmware. How can i override and assign
> /32 ip addr
GRE tunnels will not just between 2 pfsense units but also my juniper and cisco sites as well..which is the main reason why i dont want to start off with openvpn.
Sent from my VEGA Original Message Subject: Re: [pfSense] GRE between 2 pfsense boxesFrom: Adam Thompson Date: Mon, 2
Given two firewall servers, A (primary) and B (failover) both running ntpd
service available to clients on the LAN. pfSense 2.2.1/amd64 on pfSense
branded C2758.
The following procedure more or less causes ntpd on B to become unstable:
1) on A, set CARP maintenance mode to make B answer all CARP
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:42 AM, day knight wrote:
>
>> I see the configuration script doesn't allow you to pick /32 address when
>> configuring an interface as my default gateway is not in the same subnet. I
>> have limited IPs and run pfs
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Tiernan OToole
wrote:
> Morning all..
>
>
> Stupid(ish) question for you...
>
>
> I have a PFSense box in the house with 3 internet connections (2x240/24
> cable modems and a 70ish/20mb VDSL line). I am wondering if i setup 3 OVPN
> connections to a single (lar
A /32 net mask is not used for used for regular routing interfaces. It has
a specialized use, usually used for virtual interfaces. On a Cisco router,
it would be used for a loopback interface. It is sometimes used as the
subnet mask for an IP alias address on host systems (where all routing is
done
Update:
I have set up the appropriate rules for iskamp gre and esp, however got stuck on GRE interface.
I have defind remote and local gre addresses as my lan IPs but doesnt seem like i can pass any traffic thru the wans.
any pointers please?
thanks
Sent from my VEGA Original Message -
Sadly, I know several xDSL providers who offer a default gateway not in the
client's subnet. (LOL: my phone auto-corrected "subnet" to "fuckety". No
kidding.)
Linux and Windows and MacOS can deal with this level of brain-deadness, *BSD
cannot.
However, the good news is that if your network is
On Mar 30, 2015 11:53 AM, "WebDawg" wrote:
>>
>
> Your default gateway HAS to be on the same subnet.
>
My ISP assigns me a /32 WAN address and a gateway on another subnet via
pppoe. It hasn't been an issue. I've never tried self-assigning a /32 to an
interface in pfSense, however.
db
__
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> OpenVPN is good at getting unicast IP traffic from A to B, but it's difficult
> to, say, run OSPF over it.
There are reasons, but that's not one of them. Lots of people run OSPF
over OpenVPN.
___
I remember seeing something years ago about the ability to use pfSense
as an appliance to run a dedicated process. I think the post was
specifically about running a name server.
My search-fu is not great enough to locate the post/thread I think I
remember. Nor is it good enough to find any recen
16 matches
Mail list logo