> Le 12 mai 2016 à 11:11, Olivier Mascia a écrit :
>
> Assuming two sites having to use NPt to map IPv6 IP Alias from WAN to
> fd00::/64 like on the LAN.
>
> For instance:
>
> Site A: a:b:c:1000::1/56 is the WAN IPv6. And a:b:c:1001::1/64 (IP Alias on
> WAN) match with fd01::1/64 on LAN thro
I think you would have a solution with placing an overall limiter on
the the wan side with the dest as the public ip. I do not do 1:1 nat
but this would be my first guess.
Since you use NAT and private ips that could be handled by LAN rules I
would think.
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Steve Y
No we're actually using NAT and private IPs inside the building. We use 1:1
NAT if a tenant needs a public IP.
--
Steve Yates
ITS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of WebDawg
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 2:38 PM
To: pfSense Support an
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Steve Yates wrote:
> To explain my need it's for limiting traffic for several tenants of
> an office building, so each gets up to "n" amount of bandwidth. Each has a
> static IP and their own router.
>
> Maybe I was just overthinking it. Having
To explain my need it's for limiting traffic for several tenants of an
office building, so each gets up to "n" amount of bandwidth. Each has a static
IP and their own router.
Maybe I was just overthinking it. Having a limiter on the WAN side
would therefore limit the connectio
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Steve Yates wrote:
> I have the limiters configured as you show. But are you saying you would
> normally set your limiter on rules on both the LAN and WAN? Basically, I
> should set it on LAN for now and when the bug is fixed set it on WAN also?
>
> --
>
> Stev
I have the limiters configured as you show. But are you saying you would
normally set your limiter on rules on both the LAN and WAN? Basically, I
should set it on LAN for now and when the bug is fixed set it on WAN also?
--
Steve Yates
ITS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: List [mailto:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Steve Yates wrote:
> A question on where to set up a limiter...if it is set on a LAN rule
> and has in/out limiters set, will the limiter only apply to outbound traffic
> matching the rule (from __ to any)? Or would that match, say, the response
> to a
A question on where to set up a limiter...if it is set on a LAN rule
and has in/out limiters set, will the limiter only apply to outbound traffic
matching the rule (from __ to any)? Or would that match, say, the response to
an outbound HTTP request? Up until now I've only had occasion
Thank you Ed & Dave for your comments maybe I will look into other FOSS
application that can do this feature because I already have the OpenKVM and
I want to give access to my friends and provision VM to them and the plan
is each servers will use the default ports although they have different DNS
e
Hello,
Assuming two sites having to use NPt to map IPv6 IP Alias from WAN to fd00::/64
like on the LAN.
For instance:
Site A: a:b:c:1000::1/56 is the WAN IPv6. And a:b:c:1001::1/64 (IP Alias on
WAN) match with fd01::1/64 on LAN through NPt.
Site B: w:x:y:1000::1/56 is the WAN IPv6. And w:x:y
11 matches
Mail list logo
