Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel

what's actually happening. Look in the SIP session description (SDP) and see what IP addresses the client is telling the other side to communicate with. Divide and conquer. On 3/21/2017 5:42 AM, Martin Fuchs wrote: > what really irritates me is the fact (tried it just now) that using

Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel

what really irritates me is the fact (tried it just now) that using it over OpenVPN instead of IKEv2 it works... any idea ? i'm gonna look over it again... Von: List im Auftrag von Martin Fuchs Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. März 2017 10:45:34 An: pfSense Su

Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel

no change with sipproxd installed... very strange... Von: List im Auftrag von Martin Fuchs Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. März 2017 10:44:36 An: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List Betreff: Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel since it's only one cli

Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel

remotes -> pfSense VPN -> Switchvox I can't tell from the OP's original description how the connections are configured. On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > maybe you need something like this > https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Siproxd_package >

Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel

nel maybe you need something like this https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Siproxd_package Eero 20.3.2017 11.56 ap. "Martin Fuchs" kirjoitti: > Hi ! > > I have a Fritz!Box (router) connected to the internet (no other > possibility). > > In i have NATted ESP, GRE

Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel

the STUN support on your phone? Cheers, Rosen Martin Fuchs wrote on 3/20/2017 3:36 AM: > Hi ! > > I have a Fritz!Box (router) connected to the internet (no other possibility). > > In i have NATted ESP, GRE, 4500, 500, 1701, ... to a pfSense VM. > > This pfSense VM just oper

[pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel

Hi ! I have a Fritz!Box (router) connected to the internet (no other possibility). In i have NATted ESP, GRE, 4500, 500, 1701, ... to a pfSense VM. This pfSense VM just operates as a VPN-Gateway. I have set up the routes in the Fritz!Box for the dial-in networks to the pfSense. I can connect

Re: [pfSense] firewall rules with fqdn-alias

seeing errors in there > before... > > -- > > Steve Yates > ITS, Inc. > -Original Message- > From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Martin Fuchs > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 4:22 AM > To: 'pfSense Support and Discussion Mai

Re: [pfSense] firewall rules with fqdn-alias

seeing errors in there > before... > > -- > > Steve Yates > ITS, Inc. > -Original Message- > From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Martin Fuchs > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 4:22 AM > To: 'pfSense Support and Discussion Mai

Re: [pfSense] firewall rules with fqdn-alias

seeing errors in there > before... > > -- > > Steve Yates > ITS, Inc. > -Original Message- > From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Martin Fuchs > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 4:22 AM > To: 'pfSense Support and Discussion Mai

Re: [pfSense] firewall rules with fqdn-alias

an Am 18.05.2016 00:12 schrieb "Martin Fuchs" : > Hi, Steve ! > No dots in the alias, yurt in the fqdn-address, the lookup works fine, > so the resolved fqdn are visible in the tables, but it seems as if the > rule is not applied. > But there is no error... > Any diagnostic hint

Re: [pfSense] firewall rules with fqdn-alias

;t valid alias names... 'The name > of the alias may only > consist of the characters "a-z, A-Z, 0-9 and _".' > > -- > > Steve Yates > ITS, Inc. > > -Original Message- > From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Mar

[pfSense] firewall rules with fqdn-alias

Hi ! We're using pfSense 2.3_1 here in a CARP-cluster. We are using rules with fqdn-aliases and those rules do not work. When i look under diagnostics -> tables i see the tables filled with the correct IPs. When I change the rule not to use the alias, but the IP instead, the rules works imme

Re: [pfSense] Quagga OSPF & VLAN

OMG ! - SHAME ON ME ;-) Seems it was far too early without any coffee ;-) Just forgot to add the interface... Fetching a coffee now and configure it ;-) Regards, martin --- Hi ! I'm wondering if i'm missing something. I tried to configure Quagga OSPF today. I have set up a Vlan where OSP

[pfSense] Quagga OSPF & VLAN

Hi ! I'm wondering if i'm missing something. I tried to configure Quagga OSPF today. I have set up a Vlan where OSPF is running in the backbone area, but i cannot configure quagga to use this vlan, it seems to only support physical interfaces. Does anyone know how to handle this - is there a

Re: [pfSense] best way to change WAN interface after migration

ay to change WAN interface after migration On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Martin Fuchs wrote: > I also thought about this, but can you tell me if the tules are > attached tot he interface name or tot he interface port ? > Everything is attached to the interface identifier, , , . Nothi

Re: [pfSense] best way to change WAN interface after migration

f: Re: [pfSense] best way to change WAN interface after migration On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Martin Fuchs wrote: > I also thought about this, but can you tell me if the tules are > attached tot he interface name or tot he interface port ? > Everything is attached to the interf

Re: [pfSense] best way to change WAN interface after migration

Von: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] Im Auftrag von Chris Buechler Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. April 2015 03:38 An: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List Betreff: Re: [pfSense] best way to change WAN interface after migration On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Martin Fuchs wrote: >

Re: [pfSense] best way to change WAN interface after migration

and discussion Betreff: Re: [pfSense] best way to change WAN interface after migration In the past I have edited a config backup and restored it. Maybe there are better ways, but find and replace in a editor does the trick :-) Brgds, Espen 11. apr. 2015 20:46 skrev "Martin Fuchs&quo

[pfSense] best way to change WAN interface after migration

Hi ! Does anyone have any experience with changing WAN-interfaces ? We migrated out CARP-cluster from one provider to another. On em1 we have provider-old and On em7 we have provider-new. The old provider will switch off his connection soon. We changed the gateways and everything,

[pfSense] new user with console menu

Hi ! When i add a new user to pfSense, this user does not have a menu when logging into the shell. What rights does the user need to have the console menu displayed ? Regards, martin ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsen

[pfSense] CARP-user

Hi ! Does anyone have experience on CARP setup with a different user than "admin" ? Is there the possibility to create another user and use that for CARP ? I did not manage to get it working. Created user "CARPsync" with "admin" group-membership (and shell access) and set CARP up to us

Re: [pfSense] CVE-2004-0230

he workaround is to turn on pf. > > Therefore, the answer to your question is technically "yes" but in > practice "no". > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Martin Fuchs wrote: > > Hi ! >

[pfSense] CVE-2004-0230

Hi ! Does CVE-2004-0230 affect pfSense 2.1.5 ? regards, Martin ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Re: [pfSense] IPSec Phase2 deflate

deflate On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Martin Fuchs wrote: > Is there any possibility to disable the IPSec deflate option ? I wasn't aware that pfSense supported the deflate option for IPsec, what makes you think it does? -Dave ___ List mail

[pfSense] IPSec Phase2 deflate

Hi ! Is there any possibility to disable the IPSec deflate option ? (It seems as if there are some problems with AVM-products and i would like to check this out) Regards, martin ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense

Re: [pfSense] pkg_add

Hi ! Hmmm, sad... so i have to find another way ;-) But thanks a lot fort he very good explained and documented links, regards, martin >Technically yes but not directly from the base OS, you'll need a FreeBSD >8.3 machine to build packages for. Remember that pfSense 2.1 is based on >8.3 and that

[pfSense] pkg_add

Hi, Jim ! Is there a possibility to install a package from the ports tree for testing purposes ? Somethink like pkg_add or else ? Regards, martin ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Re: [pfSense] https transparent proxy project failed...

It is also not legal everywhere ;-) -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] Im Auftrag von Ryan Coleman Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Juni 2014 14:00 An: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List Betreff: Re: [pfSense] https transparent proxy project faile

Re: [pfSense] Intel Pro/1000 PT Quad Port PCI-e Gigabit Ethernet

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Dave Warren mailto:da...@hireahit.com> > wrote: Anyone have experience with a Intel Pro/1000 PT Quad Port PCI-e Gigabit Ethernet Server Adapter EXP19404PT on pfSense? >From wandering the forums it looks like it should be supported in pfSense 2, >but I can't find

Re: [pfSense] package installed but not appearing in services\diagnostics\etc drop-down menus

Did you try to reinstall the xml gui components ? Von: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] Im Auftrag von Naor Livne Gesendet: Montag, 28. April 2014 16:25 An: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List Betreff: [pfSense] package installed but not appearing in services\diagnostics\etc

Re: [pfSense] after upgrade to 2.1.1: never ending "Carp cluster member has resumed the state "BACKUP"" mails

:59 An: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List Betreff: Re: [pfSense] after upgrade to 2.1.1: never ending "Carp cluster member has resumed the state "BACKUP"" mails On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Martin Fuchs mailto:mar...@fuchs-kiel.de> > wrote: Same un

Re: [pfSense] after upgrade to 2.1.1: never ending "Carp cluster member has resumed the state "BACKUP"" mails

1.1: never ending "Carp cluster member has resumed the state "BACKUP"" mails On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Martin Fuchs wrote: > Hi ! > > It's very often that out CARP flaps. > > We have 5 Interfaces and it's about 10 times a day, but it's since the

Re: [pfSense] after upgrade to 2.1.1: never ending "Carp cluster member has resumed the state "BACKUP"" mails

[pfSense] after upgrade to 2.1.1: never ending "Carp cluster member has resumed the state "BACKUP"" mails On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Martin Fuchs mailto:mar...@fuchs-kiel.de> > wrote: Hi ! We're running a clustered pfSense (2 Machines x86) and it runs f

Re: [pfSense] after upgrade to 2.1.1: never ending "Carp cluster member has resumed the state "BACKUP"" mails

upport and Discussion Mailing List Betreff: Re: [pfSense] after upgrade to 2.1.1: never ending "Carp cluster member has resumed the state "BACKUP"" mails - "Martin Fuchs" wrote: > Same under pfSense 2.1.2 > > > > Any hints ? > > &

Re: [pfSense] after upgrade to 2.1.1: never ending "Carp cluster member has resumed the state "BACKUP"" mails

Same under pfSense 2.1.2 Any hints ? Could it be helpful to play with the base ans skew values ? Von: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] Im Auftrag von Martin Fuchs Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. April 2014 16:27 An: list@lists.pfsense.org Betreff: [pfSense] after upgrade to 2.1.1

[pfSense] after upgrade to 2.1.1: never ending "Carp cluster member has resumed the state "BACKUP"" mails

Hi ! We're running a clustered pfSense (2 Machines x86) and it runs fine. Yesterday i updated to the 2.1.1 release and since then i contstantly receive "Carp cluster member has resumed the state "BACKUP"" mails. This has never been an issue before. and the cluster does not change roles since

Re: [pfSense] pfSense routing and TCP sequence numbers

ml Google is your friend ;-) On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Martin Fuchs mailto:mar...@fuchs-kiel.de> > wrote: Hi ! We use pfSense 2.0.1 and have a local LAN, a WAN and remote Offices connected by managed VPN-connections (pfsense does not need to stablish VPN tot he re

[pfSense] pfSense routing and TCP sequence numbers

Hi ! We use pfSense 2.0.1 and have a local LAN, a WAN and remote Offices connected by managed VPN-connections (pfsense does not need to stablish VPN tot he remote offices). LAN -> pfSense -> remote office In the LAN we have a HiPath Communications system and in the remote offices one r