> > > > Have a nice day/night/evening/morning!
> > > Considering the 'random/seed help' thread: Is this a path? ;-)
> > > If so the order confuses me a little...
> >
> > It's function refinements... ^_^
>
> And morning! is a new datatype?
Just different dialects for the 'net and rebol
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Have a nice day/night/evening/morning!
> > Considering the 'random/seed help' thread: Is this a path? ;-)
> > If so the order confuses me a little...
>
> It's function refinements... ^_^
And morning! is a new datatype?
Hello,
On 27-Sep-99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I made the recommended change and got the following:
>
> Script: "REBOL HTTP Proxy" (4-Aug-1999)
---snip---
> -Original Message-
> From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > Have a nice day/night/evening/morning!
> Considering the 'random/seed help' thread: Is this a path? ;-)
> If so the order confuses me a little...
It's function refinements... ^_^
Andrew Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
Online @ 33,600 Baud!
-><-
Ed wrote:
> Anybody got any other suggestions ?
Look really closely at the headers of a email that works. To see what
the headers look like.
Andrew Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
Online @ 33,600 Baud!
-><-
[REBOL] Send mail with groupwise Re:(2)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 14:56:36 +
> >From what I have read of the groupwise API docs it appears to need a header
> >in the format:
Is that header in the RFC header of the message (that is directly after standard
headers an
On 29-Sep-1999/14:00:28-5:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Geza Lakner wrote:
>>BTW how can I "unalias" a word (without restarting REBOL :-) )
>
>As far as I can tell, you can't.
That is correct. You can't. I believe 'alias was included only for the
sake of internationalization, therefore, once s
Geza Lakner wrote:
>I would like to "overload" the system SEND function
>with a default action of SEND/HEADER thus I tried to alias it like:
>
>alias 'send/header "send"
>
>Unfortunately, it didn't work.
Don't do that :)
Try something like this:
system-send: :send
send: func [
"Send a messa
Hi Robert!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi, well this works but you have to keep the stuff in sync. So
>the problem isn't to put a name into an object but to refer to
>the Rebol-used-name of the object.
Objects in REBOL don't have names - they are just values that
can be assigned to words or refere
So the problem is that you need to go through the proxy for web
activity but not for POP?
In that case you may need a more advanced setup than just using
set-net.
"... Yo, pekr, try reading the proxy how-to" :-)))
Or do I misunderstand the problem?
Sterling
> Hi,
>
> I will try to describe p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> Have a nice day/night/evening/morning!
Considering the 'random/seed help' thread: Is this a path? ;-)
If so the order confuses me a little...
Tom
Hi Gabriele,
you wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
>
>> (Right now, COMPOSE [()] == [unset], but this has
>> been changed so COMPOSE [()] = [])
>
>Jeff, this works already using COMPOSE [([])] !
>
The difference between your version, COMPOSE [([])], and Jeff's vers
On 29-Sep-99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 10:13 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [REBOL] Constructor semantics? Re:
>
>> wouldn't self work?
obj: make object!
>
>>
Personally, I've found restarting REBOL to be a very healthy thing to do...
when it's not doing what seems reasonable. I'm sure some of the newbie
things I ask of it drive IT's "mind" insane! :) Taking breaks is also good
medicine.. sigh, when one can tear themselves away from a notion and MAKE
>--- end of quote ---
>Andrew seems to have gotten this a bit backwards. To avoid
>confusion, you may wish to switch that around a bit:
>
>send/header [EMAIL PROTECTED] {Your Appointment message here} make
>system/standard/email [...
>]
Sorry I hadn`t given enough information before. I had tri
Hello !
I would like to "overload" the system SEND function
with a default action of SEND/HEADER thus I tried to alias it like:
alias 'send/header "send"
Unfortunately, it didn't work. BTW how can I "unalias" a word
(without restarting REBOL :-) )
Thank you for your input
Geza Lakner MD
[E
Hi,
I will try to describe problems we encountered in our company. It's not
directly related to REBOL, but well, at least partly it is.
So, our daughter company is our Inet provider. They are connecting us to
external world thru firewall. All I had to do a few days ago, was to set
my Netscape' S
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 10:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Constructor semantics? Re:
> wouldn't self work?
> >> obj: make object!
> val-1: "this is me."
> print-val:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
> (Right now, COMPOSE [()] == [unset], but this has
> been changed so COMPOSE [()] = [])
Jeff, this works already using COMPOSE [([])] !
Ciao,
/Gabriele./
o) .-^-. (--o
| Gabriele Sa
If you look at the refinements 'send requires, that should solve your
problem:
>> help send
Send a message to an address (or block of addresses)
Arguments:
address -- An address or block of addresses (email block)
message -- Text of message. First line is subject.
Refinements:
/only -
Hi,
Here is a question for ya. Is it possible to write a
rebol script that can be used with Novell Groupwise5 to not
only send mails (which is no problem to do) but to also
be used to make appointments ? It appears to use a custom
header file to identify what type of item is being sent
(email, app
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 10:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Constructor semantics? Re:
> There is already a 'this' but it's called 'self..
> ...
Hi, thanks for the info, the 'make self
Sometimes it's good to take a break, and restart REBOl. ^_^
Have a nice day/night/evening/morning!
Andrew Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
Online @ 33,600 Baud!
-><-
--
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Parse Question: W
... so you only need word: :word if you want to go back to the index
of the beginning of the sought after characters. Parse automagically
moves the index just beyond the set of characters in the parse
statement ...
Hrrrmm
Cheerfulness,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I didn't follow the conversation but:
> Why traverse the string again? You already traversed it by "--- ".. then you can
> leave out the mark: :mark clause.. also you should use [thru newline] to prevent
> another 'dumb' loop of the parser...
>
> rule: [
> "==="
I didn't follow the conversation but:
Why traverse the string again? You already traversed it by "--- ".. then you can
leave out the mark: :mark clause.. also you should use [thru newline] to prevent
another 'dumb' loop of the parser...
rule: [
"===" copy header thru newline
Hi Robert,
Haven't had time to think about your first item. As for:
>Further I would like to have a way to refer to the literal object
>name or to the 'this' object. Things like this/name, this/size,
>this/constructed? etc. would be really nice. What do you think?
>
wouldn't self work?
>> obj:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> EAT, I think this is what you need:
>
> headrule: [
> some [
> thru "=== " copy head to newline (
> append head " (FIRST LEVEL)" append full-contents head
> )
> |
>
>Hi, I just have come to a point where a Ctor semantic for objects
>would help a lot. I have several objects (with functions,
>variables etc.) in my script, which are created from a prototype:
>
>obj1: make! Prototype[ ]
>obj2: make! Prototype[ ]
>obj3: make! Prototype[ ]
>
>I want t
29 matches
Mail list logo
