[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> Well, it can, just that right now it isn't. ;-) Put in a request for it if
> you think it's important.
;-) Why should I? Isn't it a little bit inconsistent and so shouldn't it be put
into request queue automatically? You know, I'm just lazy :-)
-pekr-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am not sure you fully understand Russ. DOS was just one example, but he sees
> possibility of Rebol becoming also language sutied well for various microCPU,
> microcontroller usagaes, which are often programmed in Basic or Assembler. It
> would not require OS! It woul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ahora: now
> hms: parse to-string ahora/time ":"
> seconds-from: (ahora - make date! [1 1 1970]) * 86400 + ((to-integer hms/1)
> * 3600) + ((to-integer hms/2) * 60) + (to-integer hms/3)
date: now
seconds: ((date - 1-1-1970) * 86400) + (date/time/hour * 3600) +
(date/ti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Before this discussion gets out of control (but thanks for enlightening me,
> anyway ;-) ), I'd like to point out that the meaning of my original mail was
> that I really cannot see any equivalence between Einstein's relativity theory
> and REBOL, other than the word "r
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 1999 5:08 PM
Subject: [REBOL] http server... Re:
> Hi Kat,
>
> you wrote:
> >I wrote a server that accepts http requests,
>
> I expect the server is written in REBOL?
Umm, no,, sorry. Would
> date: now
> seconds: ((date - 1-1-1970) * 86400) + (date/time/hour * 3600) +
> (date/time/minute * 60) + date/time/second
>
Gabriele has the closest solution yet, but it's still 4 hours short. I'm
thinking, I'm thinking.
--Ralph
Ah... now we're making progress.
now - 31-12-1969 * 86400
works, except that gives the right day but not the current time. All I gotta
do now is figure how how to do the correct time. (using the above, we get
941241600 which translates, using from the Unix command date -r 941241600)
to Fri Oct
I'm off four hours using Gabriele's solution... could this be the difference
between my time zone and GMT? If so, just adding 4 hours gives me the
correct answer?
--Ralph
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 1999 6:33 AM
>
Sure sounds like it... since the algorithm has to presume SOME time zone, so
GMT would be used.
Use now/zone to create the offset you desire.
R.
At 09:12 AM 10/29/99 -0400, you wrote:
>I'm off four hours using Gabriele's solution... could this be the difference
>between my time zone and GMT?
Hello,
I've just about solved my HTML parsing question from yesterday. (The code
segment I provided yesterday provided a simplistic example.) For some reason
I don't quite understand, the information I needed on parsing is found in
the "Addendum" to the Users Guide.
I now want to specify multip
Dear Pekr
Can't say for sure about the linker. All I know of Causeway is their dos
extender and then only as is embedded in other programs, Euphoria being one.
ZB
___
Subject: [REBOL] DOS port. Re:
From:<[EMAIL PROTE
Can anyone come up with a more readable way of doing this?
As a function it will return an html string text with a color based on the
intensity value from 0 green to 100 red (ish)
; intensity is an integer between 0-100
color-text: func [ intensity text ] [
temp: join to-string pick to-he
>
> > date: now
> > seconds: ((date - 1-1-1970) * 86400) + (date/time/hour * 3600) +
> > (date/time/minute * 60) + date/time/second
> >
>
> Gabriele has the closest solution yet, but it's still 4 hours short. I'm
> thinking, I'm thinking.
>
> --Ralph
>
OKAY! I gots it! A quick addon to Gabriele'
> Hello,
>
> I've just about solved my HTML parsing question from yesterday. (The code
> segment I provided yesterday provided a simplistic example.) For some reason
> I don't quite understand, the information I needed on parsing is found in
> the "Addendum" to the Users Guide.
>
> I now want t
You can send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll get them to the right
person(s). :-)
On 28-Oct-1999/22:44:02-4:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I tried sending some recommendations for improvements to the online
>documentation. But the message was returned to me saying:
>
>The error message
Jan,
Thanks for your suggestion. You left off a closing parentheses but now it
works as shown below. To generalize for multiple expressions, I'll just
write the code in a block statement.
Thanks,
Cheryl
> > I now want to specify multiple expressions in a rule. As a an example
from
> > the Adde
Well, getting seconds is possible, but is there a portable
way to get a micro-seconds timer?
With the new console commands, you could finally make a
game of tetris this way ;)
...Michael...
(alas, no colours...)
How 'bout this:
color-text: func [intensity text][
rejoin [
{} text ]
]
On 29-Oct-1999/16:18:51+1:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>Can anyone come up with a more readable way of doing this?
>
>As a function it will return an html string text with a color based on the
>intensity val
Howdy johnkenyon:
Bo said:
> How 'bout this:
>
> color-text: func [intensity text][
>rejoin [
> {} text ]
>]
Here's another approach, a little less string-concatenatey:
;- You get back a block with two tag!s surrounding whatever 'text is
color-text: func [intensity text][
c
Ole,
Thought we might be pushing beyond the speed-of-hype here.
Hey, the lighter the hype mass, the less energy it takes to accelerate it, right? The
fastest hype is the lightest weight.
I agree with you. So, axed it will be. A brainstorm item, and we don't need it to
push our ideas.
Of c
At 10/28/99 10:44 PM -0400, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I tried sending some recommendations for improvements to the online
>documentation. But the message was returned to me saying:
>
>The error message was:
>no such address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Are you sure this is the correct address?
>
>Thanks,
Cheryl,
(Whoops, slipped no reply on previous message.)
Tyler will check into the [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem. Ty checked it prior to posting, so
I'm a bit puzzled about why it was not working.
Bo is correct that the BEST address for everything is [EMAIL PROTECTED], and that
includes docs.
Or how about :
"Carl does not play dice with the universe."
(hey, it worked for Clapton ...) 8)
Mike Mastroianni
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, October 28, 1999 5:03 PM
Subje
>>-original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Subject: [REBOL] Need a Script Re:(2)
>>
>>
>>Russ thanks for the help. I am trying to make a script to check a site
>>every xx:xx minutes and see if a specific word on a page exists. if
>>not send me email... and
At 10/29/99 04:18 PM +0100, you wrote:
>
>
>Can anyone come up with a more readable way of doing this?
>
>As a function it will return an html string text with a color based on the
>intensity value from 0 green to 100 red (ish)
>
>; intensity is an integer between 0-100
>color-text: func [ intensi
Howdy Martin:
> also with parenthesis
>> + 3 ( 4 + 5 ) > == 13
>> + 2 ( 3 + 4 ) > == 10
> This is no wierd Pentium bug, isn't it? ;-)
That's a pre 2.2 beta bug.
BTW: Not in the upcoming 2.2 release, but soon afterwards we're
eliminating the prefix behavior of + and -. There'll still
Hi,
There seems to be alot about parse I don't understand...
Almost all non-trivial uses of parse involve words like 'thru' and 'to' in
the parse rule.
Yet I have never seen docs on this. Even the new 2.2 dictionary docs only
have the word thru in the doc once, and that is in a parse example.
Gavin,
I understand what you are going through. I just want "thru" the same thing
with understanding parsing in REBOL. The explanation you want on parsing is
in the "Addendum" to the User's Guide at
http://www.rebol.com/user-guide/users.html. I would like to see in the
future REBOL do a more thor
Hi!
When developing on REBOL scripts a error happens from time to time. REBOL
then displays what happened and where it happened. The what is often quite
okay, but the where sucks.
Look at this example:
---
REBOL [] do %include.r include %html.r
return-stuff: func []
[
"Stuff"
]
return-e
I knew Jeff would jump all over my example ;-)
I didn't know build-tag was built-in to REBOL yet. I originally
started with a COMPOSE but didn't want to dig out the build-tag
code. Guess I should have tried:
help build-tag
before starting :-)
I also toyed with enbase, but it wasn't as stra
V2
T941237091
K0
N0
P138991
I3/1/8239
Fb
$rESMTP
$sbrando.rebol.net
$_rebol.net [199.4.95.216]
S<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RPFD:
H?P?Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
HReceived: from brando.rebol.net (rebol.net [199.4.95.216])
by jab.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA15433
for ; Fri, 29 O
> I knew Jeff would jump all over my example ;-)
Hey-- You told me I'm the script cop. Just doing my job. Ha ha
just kidding.
But no reason to grumble there, Bo. It wasn't my intention to "jump
all over" your example. Just trying to point out a different way to do
it and to rant about e
Jeff,
My response was only intended with the pinnacle of lightheartedness.
No grievous feelings, ol' chap!
On 29-Oct-1999/17:33:34-6:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I knew Jeff would jump all over my example ;-)
>
> Hey-- You told me I'm the script cop. Just doing my job. Ha ha
>just kidd
On 29-Oct-1999/14:17:15-7:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>What you want is:
>
>skip to-hex 255 6
>
>== #FF
The master hath spoken! (Why didn't I think of that???)
--
Bohdan "Bo" Lechnowsky
REBOL Adventure Guide
REBOL Technologies 7
On Fri, 29 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There seems to be alot about parse I don't understand...
>
Hi
I just wanted to say that reading about something called BNF
(Backus-Naur Form) helped me a lot when I tried to figure out how
parse works. If you know how BNF rules work, p
Well, ^(escape) and ^(page) are used within strings to put those
characters into the string. Page will make a new page, i.e. clear the
screen. You can also use ^L for page.
As far as scripts go, there are some high quality examples on the
REBOL.com website as well a selection of scripts from
That appears to be a Julian day referenced to the start of the year. My
understanding of a Julian day number is that it is the number of days since
the start of the current Julian period, which started noon Jan 1 4713 BC.
Noon of Dec 31 1998 was the beginning of JD 2,451,179. There is an
algori
37 matches
Mail list logo
